Truemors
is reporting from
Member
NP Rank:
NP Rank:
Political Correctness is the "Sharia" of the Laicism State!
Share: 
by la3 | April 23, 2007 at 04:11 pm
655 views | 10 Recommendations | 5 comments
Does anybody has realize the likeliness of the Political Correctness and Sharia?
Sharia is the "law" applied automatically wherever there´s a Radical Islamic State. There are even western like Arabian countries that obey strictly the Sharia.
In these countries:
- Alcohol beverages are proihibited
- Music is not allowed
- Women must cover their faces and bodies
The political correctness, for its turn are making huge progress in the same direction
- Smoke is prohibited in public places in almost all countries of Europe, US and Latin America
- Fat: people fat or restaurants that sell fat meals (specially if they have a clown as a pet) are being targeted by low-fat radicals
- Crucifixes and other symbols of christianity like Easter, Christmas are being , or banned or turned into something other than its original meaning
Both Sharia and Polictical Correctness are pursuing the same goals: to impede people to do the "wrong" things or "christian" things, at least. Their perpetrators do not believe in freedom. Freedom to do wrong, to fail is freedom that must be allowed too. It´s with our errors that we can pursue the good.
But they demand that everybody must do the right, or what they think it´s right in a automated way.
Both are wrong and both seems to me symptons of a religious radicalism. There were in the ancient times many religions that were totalitarian in their views and actions. They were called "pagan" religions because the people must act exactly as they demand.
I can´t see nothing different right now. Just one small difference. The Political Correctness, wiht its goal to turns any government into a kind of a "new" laicism state - seems to be the "icebreaker" (preparation) for a subsequent painless "Sharia" deployment.
(Added to swimming against the red tide
What is NowPublic?
NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.
Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (5)
at 16:14 on April 23rd, 2007
Interesting view. I like your idea of shaking up established viewpoints by daring to take on the subjects straight on. Here is a comparison I would like to add.
Sharia:
Evangelical Christianity:
It's the Texas - Taliban connection thing ---- Fundamentalism.
at 16:22 on April 23rd, 2007
The difference, my dear Area Man, is that Sharia is a law that even who is not Muslim have to obey. That is exactly what they are doing here in Europe. To transform a religious rule (the kind you thing you mentioned) into State`s Rule. That is the connection with Laicism State and Political Correctness.
Evangelicans are just evangelicans.. If you do not want to share their ideias and creed,m just leave them.
Luís Afonso
at 01:59 on April 24th, 2007
la3, you've convinced me you've done the work. Thanks for bringing two phenomena to our attention from an unusual perspective which, compared this way, indicate that even those who believe they are worlds apart, actually aren't just as much. Good stuff.
at 06:59 on April 24th, 2007
la3... Evangelical ideas lead to leaders who propose a marriage amendment to the Constitution of the US. They lead to those that support a ban on stem cell research. When these things become law, we all must abide. So there is not quite the gulf you define, unfortunately
at 07:27 on April 24th, 2007
What I know is that the stem cell research that is to be ban is on embryonic cells. I think it to be right because the best results on stem cells are coming from adult stem cells. So, there´s no need to reserch by killing people. I must admit that all the fuss about it seems to me that the adherents of the idea of fetuses stem cell research only want to do it because it demands that fetuses must be killed, not that it will be a real good for the humanity.
Why don´t use adult stem cells? The stunning results spread by the media came from adult cells. Just because there´s a single case of embryonic stem cell research being used in humans. Not now and not within the next 20 years ahead.
Luís Afonso