NP Rank:
Banana Terrorism: Chiquita fined $25m for paying terrorists
When a banana company is fined $25m for supporting terrorism you do a double take.
A US judge has confirmed a $25m (£12.5m) fine on banana company Chiquita for having given protection money to Colombian paramilitary groups.
But they weren't really supporting them, rather paying them off so they didn't kill their workers. Perhaps the most shocking this is the power that the terrorist groups have. Instead of turning to the government for help it was more effective for the Chiquita to pay over $1.5m to the internationally recognized terrorist groups.
Prosecutors had said Chiquita Brands International paid the money between 1997 and 2004 to the AUC in return for "protection".
The AUC, which is listed by the US and EU as a terrorist organisation, has carried out massacres and assassinations, although it is now engaged in a peace process in Colombia. Prosecutors said Chiquita also made payments to Colombia's main left-wing rebel group, the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (Farc).
NowPublic on Facebook
Crowd Power
-
fabbio
Islington, -
whitneybee
Mountain View, California, United States -
glass window
Arlington, Virginia, United States -
ultra-K
Annandale, Virginia, United States -
amanky
Hood River, Oregon, United States -
puuikibeach
Waialua, Hawaii, United States -
msgvb
Virginia Beach, Virginia, United States -
ryan
Vancouver, Canada -
IckyPic
Pueblo, Colorado, United States -
prettywar-stl
Saint Louis, Missouri, United States -
MNgilen
Des Moines, Iowa, United States -
cartwheelsatmidnight
Lafayette, Indiana, United States -
sanne1.rm
Arlington, Texas, United States -
bebop717
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Recommendations (6)

Anonymous user















Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (5)
at 13:45 on September 17th, 2007
Ryan Nadel, you've convinced me you've done the work - it's authentic. I also think that you've been fair and thorough. I didn't get the sense that you were hiding your biases, or passing off other's work as your own. I also think you deserve praise for being an eyewitness, and for your investigative efforts. Good stuff.
at 20:37 on September 17th, 2007
Hi Ryan,
Interesting story.
"But they weren't really supporting them, rather paying them off so
they didn't kill their workers."
I think this is Chiquita's spin on the story. They are attempting to minimize
the damage. The $25 million fine is no more than a corporate speeding ticket
for the multi-billion dollar banana company.
The firm said its only motive was the safety of its Colombian workers. (BBC)
I think the lawyers and PR executives will be celebrating their victory.
Chiquita Brands International, the banana giant based in Cincinnati,
Ohio, is being sued for its alleged role in the murders of nearly two
dozen Colombian workers killed by paramilitary groups between 1997 and
2004...
Fifty-eight Colombian labour activists were killed in 2006 alone,
according to the New York-based Human Rights Watch, while the Escuela
Nacional Sindical, a Colombian labour rights group, puts the number of
killings for that year at 72...
According to the John F. Henning Centre for International Labour
Relations at the University of California, Berkeley: "Links between the
right-wing paramilitary groups that carry out the majority of these
killings and both U.S.-based corporations operating in Colombia and
U.S. military assistance to the country have become increasingly
evident."
"Of greatest concern are the alarming links between the official
Colombian military and the ultra-right-wing organisations of the United
Self-Defence Forces of Colombia, who are responsible for 90 percent of
trade union assassinations in Colombia," researchers at the Centre
found.
http://ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=38473
at 09:21 on September 18th, 2007
Great comments! There is a lot of back-history with Chiquita and other large banana companies trying to push out trade with developing countries that need to export bananas in order to maintain their current GDP levels. The banana trade in many ways resembles diamond cartels from the bullying aspect...now terrorism? Can anyone say "greedy"? Sheesh!
at 09:31 on September 18th, 2007
Hi Babblingdweeb,
"Can anyone say "greedy"? Sheesh!"
I think the question is, can anyone say murder for greed?
Unfortunately, the answer is no.
at 13:29 on September 18th, 2007
What is more incredible Michael Chertoff, the current head of the Department of Homeland Security, knew about this and did nothing about it when he was in the Justice Department. What is even more incredible despite the fact that Chertoff was the biggest reason that the federal government's response was so poor in New Orleans, he was seriously considered for the position of the Attorney General.
Google "John Walker Lindh" + "Michael Chertoff" .