NP Rank:
Big Brother Bad Idea Still Breathing
In 2002, John Poindexter, a major outlaw in the Iran-Contra scandal, took the reins of the U.S. Defense Department’s Total Information Awareness project (TIA).x10 One of the features of TIA, was the “Terrorism Futures Market”, which would set up a web site to allow people to bet on future violent events, such as terror attacks, coups and assassinations.x11 Another feature of TIA—its core program—would collect all electronic records on any person into a massive database, and search the database to identify new terrorist suspects. Such records would include banking, shopping, email, phone calls, internet browsing, travel, educational history, medical history, veterinary history, fingerprints, retinal scans, video of one’s gait, and you-name-it. The TIA logo had the dollar bill’s pyramid with the eye on top scoping the whole world, and the inscription “scientia est potentia” (knowledge is power). The picture recalls the “enormous pyramidal structure of glittering white concrete” that is the Ministry of Truth building in the novel 1984, and we might imagine the logo with a different inscription—“Big Brother is watching.” In 2003 news about these TIA programs got out, and the public outcry shut down the project. At that time humorist Andy Borowitz joked that the Defense Department moved Poindexter to head a new agency, “The Department of Bad Ideas”, where he could really bear down on such bizarre programs.x12 In fact, the Bush regime did move the core TIA bad idea to another department—the National Security Agency (NSA)—where it now hides in that agency’s secret budget.x13x22So what is the status of the surviving TIA core program? The data collection part of it could be going very well. Shortly after taking office, the Bush regime started another NSA program—the illegal warrantless wiretapping at telecommunications companies.x14x23x24 In that program the agency taps into the data switches of AT&T and Verizon to watch and gather telephone and internet communications.x15x21 That information—who you call and email, the content of your calls and emails, what websites you visit, and so on—could be feeding the TIA database. But the terrorist identification part of TIA is likely going very poorly. Experts say the computer program would have to track 1000 false hits for one true hit—and would likely give many false positives.x16 Already, data from the NSA warrantless wiretapping has flooded the FBI with bum leads wasting agents’ time.x17 But, while it is hard to get a good terrorist suspect out of the database, it would be easy to identify a political opponent. The executive branch could use that capability to out-maneuver, embarrass, blackmail, harass or arrest such persons. The Bush executive has already used NSA data for spying on U.S. government officials, companies and news reporters.x18x19x20 So, having the will and the way, the Bush regime seems to be building the “is watching” part of the Big Brother society.
Full article with sources HERE.
News Tools
October 28, 2007 at 08:31 pm by hungeski, 572 views, 5 comments





Add a comment
Comments (5)
at 22:40 on October 28th, 2007
A. In January, 2009, President Bush will turn over the presidency to whomever wins the November, 2008 election - as has happened over and over in America. When that happens, all the kooks and their conspiracy theories will look even more foolish than they do now.
A. The NSA program to record and evaluate the electronic commnications of suspected foreign terrorists with their US based accomplices is perfectly legal.
C. Admiral Poindexter is a loyal and fine American who got caught up in a nasty bit of politics as the Democratic Congress tried to usurp the powers of the President and his staff to conduct foreign policy.
at 23:01 on March 5th, 2008
I think the NSA warrantless wiretapping program is clearly illegal, breaking the FISA law and Fourth Amendment. I think most informed people hold this view, including the federal judge who ruled it unconstitutional.
Source #10 -- Robert Parry:
at 18:05 on March 15th, 2008
You are not correct:
Supreme court won't review Bush domestic spying case
Tue Feb 19, 2008 10:10am EST
By James Vicini
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Supreme Court on Tuesday turned down a legal challenge to the warrantless domestic spying program President George W. Bush created after the September 11 attacks.
The American Civil Liberties Union had asked the justices to hear the case after a lower court ruled the ACLU, other groups and individuals that sued the government had no legal right to do so because they could not prove they had been affected by the program.
The civil liberties group also asked the nation's highest court to make clear that Bush does not have the power under the U.S. Constitution to engage in intelligence surveillance within the United States that Congress has expressly prohibited.
"The president is bound by the laws that Congress enacts. He may disagree with those laws, but he may not disobey them," Jameel Jaffer, director of the ACLU's National Security Project, said in the appeal.
Bush authorized the program to monitor international phone calls and e-mails of U.S. citizens without first obtaining a court warrant. The program's disclosure in December 2005 caused a political uproar among Democrats, some Republicans and civil liberties activists.
The administration abandoned the program about a year ago, putting it under the surveillance court that Congress created more than 30 years ago.
The high court's action means that Bush will be able to disregard whatever legislative eavesdropping restrictions Congress adopts as there will be no meaningful judicial review, the ACLU attorneys said.
The journalists, scholars, attorneys and national advocacy groups that filed the lawsuit said the illegal surveillance had disrupted their ability to communicate with sources and clients.
The appeals court based in Cincinnati dismissed the case because the plaintiffs could not state with certainty they had been wiretapped by the government's National Security Agency.
Administration lawyers opposed the appeal and said further review by the Supreme Court was unwarranted.
The Supreme Court sided with the administration and rejected the appeal without any comment.
Also, as you said, Admiral Poindexter was not convicted of anything, so stop smearing him.
at 23:08 on March 17th, 2008
The only judge to rule on the merits did rule Bush's warantless wiretapping unconstitutional. The appeals court later dismissed the case on a technicality, and the Supreme Court later still refused the case, letting the appeals court dismissal stand. (See Supreme Court Skips 4th, Keeps Catch-22)
As seen in the excerpt from Robert Parry above, Poindexter was convicted of five felonies, and later let off on a technicality.
at 10:33 on March 18th, 2008
What you call a technicality is the way our system works. President Bush has obeyed every court order, and the nSA program was vetted with Congressional committees that deal with national security. Get over it.