Blackwater Responds

by BigT | September 17, 2007 at 07:36 pm
487 views | 2 Recommendations | 3 comments

Photos

Blackwater Responds

Blackwater Responds

see larger image

uploaded by BigT

I would hope that everyone could read this story giving these guys the benefit of the doubt. But some people can only think good things about people like Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden. I guess when your position is that everything America does is bad you'll automatically think that we're all murderous thugs. But those who had rape rooms and filled mass graves were really just being bullied by America.


RALEIGH, N.C. -- When a former Navy SEAL launched Blackwater USA in North Carolina's swamplands a decade ago, he envisioned a world-class training facility for those in the business of providing security.

But since the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, the notoriously secretive company has found its niche in selling security directly. Blackwater has earned hundreds of millions of dollars fielding what critics contend is essentially a private army in Iraq and other hotspots, where it has often employed aggressive tactics that some call reckless and possibly criminal.

Those critics now include the Iraqi Interior Ministry, which said Monday it had revoked Blackwater's license to operate following a chaotic weekend shootout that Iraqi authorities say left eight civilians dead and 13 injured.

"The 'civilians' reportedly fired upon by Blackwater professionals were in fact armed enemies and Blackwater personnel returned defensive fire," company spokeswoman Anne Tyrrell said late Monday. "Blackwater regrets any loss of life, but this convoy was violently attacked by armed insurgents, not civilians, and our people did their job to defend human life."

Robert Young Pelton, an independent military analyst who spent a month with a Blackwater team in Baghdad while researching his book, "Licensed to Kill," said Blackwater contractors No. 1 priority is keeping their high-value clients alive.

"The Blackwater guys are not fools," Pelton said. "If they were gunning down people it was because they felt it was the beginning of an ambush."

It wasn't immediately clear if the Iraqi action against Blackwater was temporary or permanent. But if Blackwater is forced to leave Iraq, where it has at least $800 million in government contracts, the privately held company based at a 7,000-acre compound in tiny Moyock stands to lose a huge piece of its burgeoning business.

Among Blackwater's clients in Iraq is the U.S. State Department, which hired the company to protect its staff as they travel through one of the world's most dangerous places.

"It's going to turn the world upside down," said retired Marine Lt. Col. Bill Cowan, an independent military analyst and the co-chairman of WVC3 Group, a security consulting firm. "You can bet the U.S. embassy is doing backflips right now pressuring the Iraqis not to revoke their license."

Blackwater burst into the public light in 2004 when a mob of insurgents ambushed a company security detail in Fallujah. Four Blackwater guards were killed and their bodies burned, the remains of two strung from a bridge.

The U.S. military's unsuccessful assault on the city in retaliation for the guards' deaths left an estimated 27 Marines and an unknown number of civilians dead.

Blackwater officials acknowledged earlier this year that one of their off-duty workers shot and killed a security guard for an Iraqi vice president last Christmas Eve. Company officials have said they fired the employee after flying him out of the country and are cooperating with federal investigators.

"There have been so many innocent people they've killed over there, and they just keep doing it," said Katy Helvenston, the mother of Steve Helvenston, one of the Blackwater men killed in the ambush in Fallujah. "They have just a callous disregard for life."

Blackwater has recently emphasized its humanitarian efforts and vision for "a safer world" on its Web site and in company literature.

Still, the firm sticks to a policy of secrecy that extends from chief executive Erik Prince, a former SEAL who founded Blackwater in 1997.

Vice chairman Cofer Black, a former director of the CIA's counterterrorism center, declined to comment when reached at his Virginia home.

Blackwater is still in the business of security training. Civilians, law enforcement and military personnel can attend dozens of seminars at Blackwater headquarters, which includes a three-mile tactical driving course, a lake for maritime maneuvers and a private airfield. The company has also opened an 80-acre satellite campus in Mount Carroll, Ill., and is looking to open another training center east of San Diego.

As it has expanded its security operations, Blackwater has offered big salaries to lure experienced former soldiers, especially those with special forces and other advanced training. The company fields a force of about 1,000 across Iraq and has a database of more than 6,000 contractors it can tap to fulfill the requirements of its more than 50 security contracts worldwide.

"Under what law are these individuals operating, and do the Iraqis have the authority to prosecute people for the crimes they're accused of committing?" said Rep. Jan Schakowsky, an Illinois Democrat and longtime Blackwater critic who is pushing Congress to regulate private security contractors. "It's a very murky area."

recommend This comment thread is now closed
gmony714
gmony714
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 03:48 on September 18th, 2007

BigT, I like this story. It's good stuff.

0
TobiasPaine

I liked the story but what's with the forward?


"But some people can only think good things about people like Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden. "


History shows that both Saddam Hussein and Osama Bin Laden were "allied" with United States, during various conflicts during the 1980's(and surrounding time periods).  I don't think anyone would condone the mass murders that either one of them has commited, but the fact that US foreign policy has a history, and that this history shows alliances with both of these men, should raise HOW, WHEN, and WHY questions.


If these questions confuse you into thinking that their actions are being defended, please accept my explaination.  We are not saying that Hussein and OBL are good people, we are saying that we need to review history and ask questions about WHY things happen, otherwise they WILL happen again and again.


Why did the US ally with Saddam Hussein?  Was he commiting any of these mass murders during these times of "alliance"?  If so, why did we not stop him THEN?


Hope this helps to clear things up,  and gives you some things to think about. 
Tobias Paine 


Remember, if you arent willing to do the research, you will never know what it is that you are fighting for, or against.

0
BigT

First, thank you for your reasoned response. Second, you may not be one of the people I was talking about who would make themselves into a human shield one day and ask for life in prison for American contractors the next.

But I have to disagree with you about us being "allies" with Iraq. It is true that during the Iran-Iraq War we funded both Iraq and Iran (i.e. Iran-Contra). I don't think any serious person would say that we really wanted either side to win, it's just we wanted them to kick the crud out of each other.

You can couple this with the fact that during the last couple of months we have agreed to sell billions of dollars worth of weapons to countries in the Middle East like Saudi Arabia. Most of the 9-11 murderers were Saudis. By your logic, that:

Why did the US ally with Saddam Hussein?  Was he commiting any of these
mass murders during these times of "alliance"?  If so, why did we not
stop him THEN?

it would stand to reason that we are responsible for the terrorists that killed 3,000 Americans that day, not to mention all the other terrorist activities that happened before and after that day.

America is in a tricky position as the world's only superpower and has to have relations with some pretty unsavory characters, that doesn't mean we support most or any of their actions.

This is basically the reason why I put the preamble to this article is because there is a large swath of people who will automatically jump to the conclusion that because a group is American it must mean that it is some sort of evil organization. 

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

gmony714
First Flagged at 3:48 AM, Sep 18, 2007 by gmony714
These members have powered this story:

Most Recommended Stories in World

 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from