Chavez Reveals Real Hostage Release Scheme

Photos

Federal Prosecutors: Chavez Bought Argentina Elections

see larger image

uploaded by mpress

• 

  uploaded by mpress | add comment

• 

  uploaded by mpress | add comment

• 

  uploaded by mpress | add comment

• 

  uploaded by mpress | add comment

It didn't take Chavez long to reveal the objective of his and FARC's stunt by releasing 2 of 700 hostages. He want's to legitamize FARC. Chavez knows that the only way for his and Castros plan to spread Castroism thru Latin America is by elections. And Farc is part of his plan. They are communist Lefists just like Chavez. So maybe they can release a hostage a week till the media starts writing stories about how humanitarian FARC is. It is so easy for leftists to fool the media these days. Just yesterday Chavez was portrayed as the victorious statesman negotiating with his murdering hostage taking comrades. Now he wants people to accept FARC as just another political movement. Let's just forget all the murders and drugs these Communist jungle dwellers are just fighting for the little guy. Like their benefactor Chavez. If it wasn't so transparent it would be deep.

The “Hero”

As I’m sure you’ve heard, ad
nauseum, the Marxist Colombian FARC rebels released two hostages that
they had been holding for ransom in the jungles of Colombia as a result
of a “deal” “negotiated” by Hugo Chavez yesterday. They are Clara Rojas
and Consuelo Gonzalez.

The press is falling all over itself in giving Chavez his props, as they say, for his “triumph”.

From Reuter’s:

CARACAS (Reuters) - Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, hit
by recent setbacks to his socialist revolution, scored a major
political victory on Thursday by winning the freedom of two hostages
held by Colombia's Marxist rebels.

The hostages' freedom also brought international praise for Chavez,
a fierce critic of the United States, and he even received grudging
acknowledgment from Washington.

Analysts said Chavez's international reputation was boosted by the
deal, just a month after he suffered a stunning defeat at home in a
referendum vote on extending his powers

"With this tangible and welcome result, Chavez can now claim that he
is a regional leader committed to peace," said Michael Shifter, a Latin
American expert at the Inter-American Dialogue think tank..

Think about this one. The FARC is a bunch of narco-trafficking
terrorist thugs in the Castro tradition who are given aid, comfort and
guidance by both Chavez and the Havana regime. Basically, the FARC is a
client organization of Havana. It has always been.

So, either two things happened here:

1) Chavez ordered him to release a couple of hostages because the
“struggle” needed a victory and if they didn’t , well I’ll cut off your
funding and your drug deals.

Or…

2) Chavez gave them a suitcase full of money to buy the release of the two women.

For this, in the eyes of the press, he’s praised as a triumphant
hero, as a humanitarian and having “won” a political victory over
Colombia’s president Alvaro Uribe.

Now, it’s not that the press doesn’t know how to be skeptical about
the motives and the actions of governments facing hostage crises. They
just choose to look the other way when it pertains to America’s
enemies, "fierce critics" and the left.

Imagine if you will, that there was a democratic right-leaning
insurgency in Mexico trying to overthrow the corrupt oligarchy that has
run that country (into the ground) for centuries. Now, its neighbor,
the U.S. openly backs these rebels and it is suspected that it covertly
finances and gives them aid and intelligence, etc.. Now, imagine that
these insurgent freedom fighters take a couple of politicians hostage
and the American president “negotiates” the release of these hostages
by the rebels that everyone knows are his allies at a time when he’s
had one political defeat after another.

How would the press handle that story? Would they praise the
American president or would they “investigate” and try to get to the
truth behind the propaganda? The “real story”.

For example, remember the Jessica Lynch story where the US military
rescued a captured female American GI form her Iraqui captors and by
the time the press (and Ms. Lynch) was done with the story, the US Military were the bad guys-as usual:

… a Pentagon willing to stretch the truth to boost morale.
One bbc report dismissed the rescue operation as "one of the most
stunning pieces of news management ever conceived." And so the
uncertainty fluttered around her: Was she a hero, or a pawn?

Interesting how no reporter is asking if its even within the realm
of possibility that Chavez or Raul are stretching the truth or using
these two released hostages as pawns or if the hostage release deal is
a “stunning piece of news management.” No, of course not. They’re
obviously being managed all too willfully and effectively by the
Castro- Chavez propaganda machine. Source babalu