NP Rank:
Controversy Intensifies Over Voting With Veils
More and more confusing. First of all, who is this Marc Mayrand? Yes, he's Canada's Chief Electoral Officer - but who elected him and why does he think he can change a law of Parliament? And why is there even any discussion in Parliament about it?
In a press conference yesterday, Mayrand said again that women wearing face-covering veils will be allowed to vote and, if members of Parliament don't like it, they can change the law. ( Excuse me, but I thought they already did.)
Furthermore, said Mayrand, although officials will be told to be "diligent" in asking women wearing burkas or niqabs to reveal their faces to election officials, they will be able to vote, even if they refuse.
I'm glad I didn't have to sit through the Parliamentary debate on the issue. I probably would have run out of the building screaming. After Maynard's news conference, an LCN all-news network commentator, Richard Martineau, suggested that people wear masks in a September 17 by-election. Mayrand, however, said officials would turn away those who show up to vote wearing masks or bags on their heads. Veils, however, are okay.


Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (1)
at 11:13 on September 11th, 2007
ppeggy, thanks for posting this. Your commentary is great...I echo a lot of your sentiments.
Most interesting about this is that it was somewhat of a non-issue until Mayrand starting beaking--most Muslim groups have stated that veiled women will reveal their faces on request. Instead of being defiant, Mayrand should have asked the gov't to supply safe areas in their polling stations where women could reveal their faces to other women in private. Law is law, and this law exists not to challenge or demean the Muslim community, but to enforce a common practice associated with voting.
I'm no fan of Harper, but this is a misplaced bit of ire on Mayrand's part. Being identifiable has long been part of Parliamentary voting law.