Truemors
is reporting from
Member
NP Rank:
NP Rank:
Give the Candidates the MLK Test
Share: 
by worldviews | January 21, 2008 at 09:03 am
699 views | 0 Recommendations | 3 comments
Give the Candidates the MLK TestBARobamaClintonA Black Agenda Radio commentary by Glen Ford
"What would Dr. King do?"
The corporate media-mangled Barack Obama/Hillary Clinton "debate" over the relative contributions of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and President Lyndon Johnson coincides with the birthday of the actual Martin Luther King. Since the corporate media is totally incapable of covering or even tolerating the raising of any issues of substance, and because both Obama and Clinton avoid real issues, real facts, and real history like the plague, we urge that thinking voters put the candidates to the Martin Luther King Test. What would Dr. King do, if he were alive?
Dr. King said the "triple evils" of his day were militarism, racism, and economic exploitation. In his brilliant April 4, 1967 speech at New York's Riverside Church, Dr. King showed the interaction of all three "evils" in the world; that these evils worked together against the interests of humanity. King declared that the Vietnam War, and other U.S. wars in the Third World, were evil manifestations of American militarism and an attempt to prevent other peoples from making "their arrival as full men" in the world - a reference to the underlying racism and economic exploitative nature of U.S. foreign policy.
In addition, Dr. King said he was "compelled to see the war as an enemy of the poor" in the U.S. King noted the "shining moment" when, after years of struggle, President Johnson became a collaborator with the Civil Rights Movement, pushing through Congress both civil rights and anti-poverty legislation. But then "came the buildup in Vietnam," and King knew, in his words, "that America would never invest the necessary funds or energies in rehabilitation of its poor so long as adventures like Vietnam continued to draw men and skills and money like some demonic destructive suction tube."
"Obama and Clinton have already failed the test."
What would Dr. King say, today, about the two quarreling corporate candidates, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton? There can be no doubt but that he would judge them as he did his former presidential ally, Lyndon Johnson. The Iraq war has taken at least a million Iraqi lives, as the Vietnam War had killed one million Vietnamese, by Dr. King's reckoning in 1967. It is an attempt to prevent Iraqis from exercising control of their own land and resources, just as King believed the Americans were attempting to do in Vietnam. And the Iraq War, just like the Vietnam War, insures that the U.S. will "never invest the necessary funds or energies" to rebuild America's cities, restore the social safety net, or provide universal health care.
BARkucinichDemocracy Senators Obama and Clinton fail the Martin Luther King Test, miserably. Obama wants to add 100,000 troops to the U.S. Armed Forces, at a cost of over $100 billion - even as he proposes partial withdrawals from Iraq. Clinton seeks 80,000 new soldiers and Marines. As sure as the sun rises, a bigger U.S. military means more wars, and no money for domestic "change."
The only candidate who would pass the Martin Luther King Test is Ohio Congressman Dennis Kucinich, whose platform for peace, truly universal health care, a living wage, and an end to corporate domination of American life harkens back to that "shining moment" in the Sixties that King mentioned, when there were "hopes" and "new beginnings." But the corporate media has caused the Kucinich campaign to disappear from coverage and televised debate.
Lyndon Johnson finally failed the Martin Luther King Test, in Vietnam. Obama and Clinton have already failed the test, through their own policy proposals. Neither has earned the right to speak of Dr. King's legacy.
For Black Agenda Radio, I'm Glen Ford.
BAR executive editor Glen Ford can be contacted at
What is NowPublic?
NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.
Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (3)
at 11:06 on January 21st, 2008
I agree with Mr. Ford that Lyndon Johnson should not be credited with the Civil Rights Bill of 1964. As a retired U.S. History instructor, the principles of the U.S. Constitution that legislators write the bills and presidents sign (or deny to sign) them was one of the questions most often missed on tests. Presidents can -- and do -- support them while in Congress. This bill was generated in the Presidency of John F. Kennedy, and he and his administration supported the concept quite early, although not early enough to prevent some deaths of civil rights activists in the South. It is the disfranchised people of the South, the African Americans, who should be credited with the enactment of the Civil Rights Bill of 1964.
However, Ohio Representative Dennis Kucinich particularly should not be associated with the ideas and principles of MLK. Recently a bill was passed in the House which supports people who are regularly imprisoned by the government of Communist Vietnam because they seek a referendum on their Constitution which prohibits dissent in any form, especially written. Only five representatives voted against HR 3096, and Kucinich was one of the five.
John E. Carey has documented the imprisonment of political opposition to the Vietnam government coinciding with visits of the U.S. administration (President Bush) to support trade. Some of this trade is with goods made with prison labor in Vietnam, who have that practice since the time of Ho Chi Minh.
Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., is certainly a worldwide inspiration of dedicating his life to nonviolent change of unjust laws and practices. The brave leaders of political opposition to the Communist regime in their country, several of whom are young women, are experiencing imprisonment this very day for advocating peaceful change and referendum on the 1992 Constitution, Article 88, which makes such advocacy a crime.
Jean Libby, editor
VietAm Review (http://vietamreview.blogharbor.com)
at 12:17 on January 21st, 2008
There is something very troubling about a
country that demolished a much weaker country and killed millions of
its people, passing a bill lecturing the latter about human rights.
Perhaps Congress should first pass a bill apologizing to the people of
Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia for the virtual genocide the US perpetrated
in that region, and paying reparations to those countries.
Besides, of the 11 million HR 3096 would authorize for 2008, $9
million is earmarked "for Radio Free Asia transmissions to Vietnam."
[http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/86xx/doc8611/hr3096.pdf]. This hardly seems
designed to support "people who are regularly imprisoned..." Rather, it
seems to be geared towards disseminating US propaganda and fomenting
opposition to the Vietnamese government.
This money would be better used toward rescuing the US constitution from the shredder.
at 12:13 on January 21st, 2008
There is something very troubling about a country that demolished a much weaker country and killed millions of its people, passing a bill lecturing the latter about human rights. Perhaps Congress should first pass a bill apologizing to the people of Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia for the virtual genocide the US perpetrated in that region, and paying reparations to those countries.
Besides, of the 11 million HR 3096 would authorize for 2008, $9 million is earmarked "for Radio Free Asia transmissions to Vietnam." [http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/86xx/doc8611/hr3096.pdf]. This hardly seems designed to support "people who are regularly imprisoned..." Rather, it seems to be geared towards disseminating US propaganda and fomenting opposition to the Vietnamese government.
This money would be better used toward rescuing the US constitution from the shredder.