NP Rank:
Is GOP Determined to Avoid Minority Voters?
Nothing has more significance for America's long-term political evolution than the demographic changes that are diversifying a mostly white nation.But you'd never know it from the Republican presidential race.
Not only is the GOP field all white and male -- in a year that Democratic contenders include an African-American senator, a Hispanic governor and a woman -- but its candidates seem determined to avoid many of the nation's more diverse groups.
So far, most Republicans have bypassed three chances to woo the fastest-growing, most tempting minority, Hispanics. They also turned down a chance to appear before a leading group of gays and lesbians and have avoided some unions, where Republicans poll a significant minority.
And next week, the top GOP hopefuls will pass up a debate designed to spotlight issues of special interest to African-Americans.
Their actions defy warnings that their party needs to expand its share of minority votes or doom itself to minority status. After 2000, President Bush's strategists said he'd lose in 2004 unless he increased his share of the Hispanic vote to 40 percent.
He did -- and he won.
Last year, after most leading Republicans denounced his immigration plan providing a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants already here, the party's share of the Hispanic vote dropped sharply.
Just last week, The Wall Street Journal, a pillar of conservatism, contrasted how the parties approached issues of concern to Hispanics in recent debates and warned of more trouble ahead.
News Tools
September 21, 2007 at 09:16 am by urbano411, 410 views, 6 comments




Add a comment
Comments (6)
at 09:24 on September 21st, 2007
The GOP manipulated voter registration and restrictions to eliminate voters of color in 2004, and again in the run-up to the mid-terms, they will doubtless do the same again.
In my opinion, those of color that vote Republican are just voting against themselves.
at 09:23 on September 21st, 2007
This is a very worthwhile piece Urbano, thank you.
It's good stuff.
at 09:43 on September 21st, 2007
urbano411, good find.
at 12:06 on September 21st, 2007
Umm, I believe that Alan Keyes is running again as a Republican, and he is black. Does it matter that Bush, despite all of his inadequacies, has had a much more diverse Cabinet than Bill Clinton had? Yes, the GOP field is too lily white and too old, but do we really want Hillary?
@Moonwolf - are you just saying this from the hip or are their verifiable facts to back up this statement?
at 13:01 on September 21st, 2007
Christopher you are correct that Bush has definitely shown more diversity in his cabinet, but many choose not to look at the issue from that perspective it doesn't serve the argument correctly. As for Hillary, I'd rather have Bill back or Nixon for that matter (we could use some good foreign relations). However, it does not help the GOP any to systematically avoid the real tough voters, the minorities, especially Latinos. Unless maybe, they want Hillary to have the next four years!
at 13:27 on September 22nd, 2007
Alan Keyes is not a good example of diversity within the republican
party. While he may garner some limited support by flagging abortion
and gay marriage, no one takes him seriously. In 1996 he was blocked
from attending a republican debate in Atlanta, GA and detained by the
police. I vividly remember him screaming about his rights as an
"American" as they dragged him away. Bush chose people of colour who
were loyal to his office to curb the damage he and his family did in
Florida during the 2000 election. Not one of these people did a thing
to speak on behalf of equality in this country, not one. The only time
I have ever seen Sec. of State Rice or Gen. Powell or Linda Chavez, or
any of his "rainbow coalition" even speak to people of colour they were
pushing the joys of joing the republican party.
The republican
party of the U.S. has moved oceans away from its origins. While its
founding fathers may have had the intellectual fiber to acknowledge
social inequality, their children understand only a regressive sense of
Europocentric bias. Africans in American see and feel the paternalism.
And Moonwolf is quite correct. The 2004 presidential election was tainted in Florida, Ohio and several Indian reservations in favour of the republican ticket. For folks who have had to watch some of us die so the rest of us could vote, this is seriously wrong business for any nation, let alone the United States.