is reporting from
Member
NP Rank:
NP Rank:
The Bush administration this morning is on the defensive after this shocking revelation from the former head of the American Federal Reserve Bank. In an interview about his new book, Mr. Alan Greenspan admitted that the Iraq invasion was basically a war for oil. While he offers an out to the administration, the bottom line was, "Saddam was bad for business, period."
- The Angryindian
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Greenspan: Ouster Of Hussein Crucial For Oil Security - washingtonpost.com: "Alan Greenspan, the former Federal Reserve chairman, said in an interview that the removal of Saddam Hussein had been 'essential' to secure world oil supplies, a point he emphasized to the White House in private conversations before the 2003 invasion of Iraq. Greenspan, who was the country's top voice on monetary policy at the time Bush decided to go to war in Iraq, has refrained from extensive public comment on it until now, but he made the striking comment in a new memoir out today that 'the Iraq War is largely about oil.' In the interview, he clarified that sentence in his 531-page book, saying that while securing global oil supplies was 'not the administration's motive,' he had presented the White House with the case for why removing Hussein was important for the global economy."
September 17, 2007 at 12:11 pm by angryindian, 472 views, 6 comments
Add a comment
Comments (6)
- reply
SthPacificat 12:26 on September 17th, 2007
GREENSPAN HITS OUT AT BUSH ADMINISTRATION
The former head of the United States Federal Reserve, Alan Greenspan, had a reputation for being just that - reserved - in his public comments. But he's broken the mould in his memoirs, taking surprising swipes at the Bush Administration over its economic management, and Iraq. The book's claim most likely to annoy the White House is that the Iraq war is "largely about oil."
In public, they seemed to get along beautifully, right down to the day Alan Greenspan was replaced as chairman of the Fed.
GEORGE BUSH, US PRESIDENT: He has dominated his age like no central banker in history. He has contributed to a better life for all Americans and I thank him for his service.
But it turns out that for years, Greenspan had been gritting his teeth, silently disgusted with Bush's big budget deficits. In his book, he writes: "My biggest frustration remained the president's unwillingness "to wield his veto against out-of-control spending."
A White House spokesman shot back: "We're not going to apologise for increased spending "to protect our national security."
His book may change the way many Americans view Greenspan, who's usually careful and convoluted when he speaks.
ALAN GREENSPAN, FORMER US RESERVE BANK CHAIRMAN: How do we know when irrational exuberance has unduly escalated asset values, which then become subject to unexpected and prolonged contractions?
But in his book, he says in clear language he is disillusioned with fellow Republicans and that they deserved to lose the last election. Greenspan himself has been under attack lately. Critics charge his policy of low interest rates resulted in too many home mortgages going to people who have now lost their homes. Tonight on 60 Minutes he says his critics are wrong.
ALAN GREENSPAN: It was our job to unfreeze the American banking system if we wanted the economy to function.
Greenspan especially upset the White House by writing in his book that the Iraq war is largely about oil. Today on ABC's This Week, Defence Secretary Gates said Greenspan is wrong.
ROBERT GATES, US DEFENSE SECRETARY: I know the same allegation was made about the Gulf War in 1991 and I just don't believe it's true.
When I asked a White House spokesman about Greenspan's charge, he dismissed it with what seemed like bitterness, saying, "I will restrain myself. The reasons we went to Iraq are well understood and had to do with weapons of mass destruction." As for Greenspan's opinion, the spokesman said, "That sounds like Georgetown cocktail party analysis."
Transcript Archive.
at 12:32 on September 17th, 2007
Sounds levelheaded to me. Only the confused would confuse "securing World oil
markets" with an oil grab. And he's dead on about Bush's fiscal
discipline. Anyway Greenspan didn't write the book a Ghostwriter did. By his last interview it looks like he doesn't even know what's in the book.
at 12:36 on September 17th, 2007
A good measuring stick to judge the accuracy of Greenspan's statements is the number and tone of personal attacks on the man. So obvious it smarts!
It's good stuff.
at 12:48 on September 17th, 2007
There is a diffrence between a personal attack and fact.
Robert B. Barnett, the lawyer who represented Mr. Greenspan in the
book negotiations, also declined to comment on the amount of the
advance. He said Mr. Greenspan was talking with several potential
ghostwriters but had not settled on one yet.
The leading
candidate for that position, David Wessel, the deputy Washington bureau
chief for The Wall Street Journal, said last month that he had talked
with Mr. Greenspan about helping him with the book. "While this has
been under discussion," Mr. Wessel said, "I've recused myself from
editing stories about Greenspan in The Journal.
at 18:10 on September 17th, 2007
Whether he authored the book or not, Mr. Greenspan endorsed it and he does not deny that he made the statement.
at 20:13 on September 17th, 2007
Agreed but he has backed off on that and the fact is the war in Iraq was planned by so called "neocons" who for many reasons including oil went into Iraq.
I think the whole lot were idiots. but thats just my opinion.