NP Rank:
Iran + Syria = WMD Malfunction
'Dozens died in Syrian-Iranian chemical weapons experiment'JPost.com Staff , THE JERUSALEM POST Sep. 18, 2007
Proof of cooperation between Iran and Syria in the proliferation and development of weapons of mass destruction was brought to light Monday in a Jane's Defence Weekly report that dozens of Iranian engineers and 15 Syrian officers were killed in a July 23 accident in Syria.
According to the report, cited by Channel 10, the joint Syrian-Iranian team was attempting to mount a chemical warhead on a Scud missile when the explosion occurred, spreading lethal chemical agents, including sarin nerve gas.
Reports of the accident were circulated at the time; however, no details were released by the Syrian government, and there were no hints of an Iranian connection.
The report comes on the heels of criticism leveled by the Syrians at the United States, accusing it of spreading "false" claims of Syrian nuclear activity and cooperation with North Korea to excuse an alleged Israeli air incursion over the country this month.
According to globalsecurity.org, Syria is not a signatory of either the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC), - an international agreement banning the production, stockpiling or use of chemical weapons - or the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty (CTBT).
Syria began developing chemical weapons in 1973, just before the Yom Kipper War. Globalsecurity.org cites the country as having one of the most advanced chemical weapons programs in the Middle East.








Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (4)
at 20:51 on September 18th, 2007
BigT, This story is just crazy, these are both peaceful countries who have no ill intentions toward anyone, I just can not believe that they would want sarin gas :) Good stufff
at 04:04 on September 19th, 2007
BigT, I like this story. It's good stuff.
at 06:51 on September 19th, 2007
Wow, terrible news. Strangely enough this hasn't gotten much pickup in the US media...
at 09:01 on September 19th, 2007
Well, the JPost is just citing a report in Jane's Defense Weekly (see here for another citation of the same article, by Reuters), which is a pretty reputable publication.