Jamie Kirchick: "I don’t think Ron Paul is a homophobe; I'm just cynical"

by slenderdog | January 8, 2008 at 01:43 pm
1750 views | 7 Recommendations | 8 comments

Photos

S6300637

S6300637

see larger image

uploaded by olfdpictures

Videos

Loading videos...
Jamie Kirchick, assistant editor of The New Republic, appeared tonight on Tucker Carlson's show to announce--with a smirk on his face the size of Manhattan--that his hit piece accusing Ron Paul of racism, homophobia and anti-semitism would be appearing online the next day--which, by astonishing coincidence happens to be the very day of the New Hampshire primary.

You can read Berchick's article here.  It's a smear job, and not a very good one.  None of the quotes are referenced so they can't be substantiated.  Like so many of Paul's opponents, Berchick has chosen the ad hominem approach, perhaps because there is so little that can be said to defend a bankrupt system against plain common sense.
I first met Jamie at a holiday party held by the venerable libertarian magazine Reason just a few weeks ago. When Jamie saw my "Ron Paul 2008" button, he snickered and said, "Oh, Ron Paul... I've been reading up on him. Have you read the stuff that guy's written? Nasty stuff! Racist, anti-semitic, homophobic!"

 
I emailed Jamie the next day to engage him further and to ask just what he found so offensive. His response:

 
Hi Berin,

 
Thanks for writing; and I’m glad you enjoyed by [sic] piece in the Boston Globe. I’ll try and make the [DC Log Cabin Republicans] party tonight, though [LCR President] Patrick Sammon isn’t particularly happy with me after I wrote this piece [attacking LCR for not endorsing Giuliani, whom Kirchick calls "the most pro-gay Republican White House contender in history"]

http://www.advocate.com/exclusive_detail...

 
Anyways, I don’t think Ron Paul is a homophobe; I’m just cynical and enjoy getting supporters of political candidates riled up. If you were a Giuliani guy I’d have called him a fascist. But I must say, the Ron Paul supporters are the most enthusiastic of the bunch! [Emphasis added.]

 
Best,

Jamie

 
When I responded to ask him when his article might come out so I could read more, he answered: "Patience, my friend :-)"

 
Patience, indeed.

 
Let me not mince words. Jamie is a muckraker, a charlatan, and a hypocrite. For being so careless about concealing all these, he is a fool to boot. His bottom-feeding journalism dishonors The New Republic's history as a bastion of high-minded political discourse. His story was deliberately timed to inflict maximum political damage on a man of such uncommonly principled integrity that he is attacked for statements written decades ago by others in his name.

 
The richest irony is that the Ron Paul grassroots campaign in Washington, DC--Jamie's hometown--has found its earliest and strongest supporters in DC's gay community. It would not surprise me if our slate of delegate and alternate delegate candidates for Ron Paul is the gayest slate in DC (measured by number of gay individuals--not gayness of individuals), very probably the gayest slate in DC ever, and probably one of the gayest slates for a major party Presidential candidate of any state ever.



Advertisement
recommend Sign In or Join to post comments
Kaitlin
Kaitlin
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 16:43 on January 8th, 2008

slenderdog, thank you for posting this--wild that we've gotten to a point where "journalists" don't even try to hide this kind of behaviour. Good stuff.

outragousart
outragousart
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 18:04 on January 8th, 2008

slenderdog, I like this story. It's good stuff.


I have always respected the "New Republic" as a fair publication. Is anyone else out there going to write to the "New Republic" to complain? I am. It's nice to let off some steam here, but I don't think the "NR" should be let off the hook without an explaination.


I am still looking at the candidates, but I think Ron Paul supporters need to look at his record, not just listen to what he says. I looked at his Congressional record, you can read what I found out in the opinion section, titled "1% Effective".

0
matt1369

Isn't the New Republic a CPD (Comittee on Present Danger) publication or was, with ties to the Council on Foreign Relations? If so, these interest groups would be hurt by Ron Paul with their only move being to smear him in such a way.

0
xyzzycoder

Rally for Ron Paul taking place in front of Anchorage, Alaska's Fox news affiliate to protest Ron Paul's exclusion from the Fox sponsored debate on Jan/6/08.

xyzzycoder has contributed a photo to this story.

0
whereslumpy

Lucy at the Ron Paul rally at the Constitution Center in Philadelphia

whereslumpy has contributed a photo to this story.

0
Philip Keogh

Ron Paul supporters out in number at the ABC New Hampshire debate.

Philip Keogh has contributed a photo to this story.

0
The Boognish

This Photo was taken at a Ron Paul Meetup event in Beavercreek OH on Jan 7th the banner has not been hung up yet but should be some time soon

The Boognish has contributed a photo to this story.

0
olfdpictures

George Stephanopoulos came into Murphy's Taproom a favorite hang out of the Ron Paul supporters, OLFD members, and FSP members in Manchester, NH the night before the primary to have a beer. He should have expected the slew of people who surrounded him immediately with questions like "If Ron wins are you really going to give him your paycheck" to which he replied "of course." Do we believe it? Of course not, but it was fun to poke at him a bit.

olfdpictures has contributed a photo to this story.

 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from