Laser Dazzler, son of Tazer: A Blinding Success.

by peter.reardon | January 16, 2008 at 01:09 pm
21535 views | 5 Recommendations | 4 comments

Photos

Laser Dazzler, son of Tazer: A Blinding Success.

Laser Dazzler, son of Tazer: A Blinding Success.

see larger image

uploaded by Swan

In an article published in the Ottawa Citizen December 23 2007, David Pugliese reported that
'Canada think-tank fears misuse of laser 'dazzlers'. The Ottawa think-tank, The Rideau Institute argues that the Defence Department has
set aside about $10 million for the purchase of lasers for use in Afghanistan
without meeting government obligations under the Geneva Convention

the laser dazzlers fall into the same category as Tasers, as they
are untested and could harm innocent people. Source: Anthony Salloum, Programme Director of the Rideau Institute
quoted in the Ottawa Citizen December 23, 20007

But what are "laser dazzlers"?

In a briefing paper published by the Rideau
Institute the authors suggested that:

Canada is planning to purchase “laser dazzlers” for deployment in Afghanistan. Military.com defines
these dazzlers as devices capable of creating, “bright pulses of coherent light,
meant to render someone sightless, temporarily". Source: Laser Weapons and Canada's International Legal Obligations
November 19, 2007 

Canada will not be the first to purchase these
inhumane weapons, it is reported that American forces are already using
them:

Last year, the Pentagon acknowledged its troops in
Iraq were using dazzler devices on their rifles. A Pentagon official said the
systems were designed to cut down on the number of shooting of Iraqis at
checkpoints
. Source Ottawa Citizen December
23, 2007

 Unfortunately the available information on whether
or not the Harper government has already purchased laser dazzlers is unclear. On
one-hand we are told:

 The Harper government has bought new weapons known
as laser dazzlers to deploy in Afghanistan. These are weapons that may
inadvertently blind innocent civilians – permanently! Source: ceasefire.ca

On the other-hand, a spokesman for The Department
of National Defence said:

The Department ...  always considers ways to
protect our Forces and reduce the potential of causing unintended harm to
civilians," spokesman Maj. Norbert Cyr stated last week.
He noted while the
military is aware of such technology it does not currently use the systems. Source:
David Pugliese , CanWest News Service,
Published: Monday, November 19, 2007

One has to wonder how many more servicemen and
women will return home from Afghanistan and Iraq to Canada with neurological
diseases through handling these weapons.
One might also consider how much
greater will be the name of Canada as a callous invading puppet of the Bush
government wrecking its once proudly independent image as an international
peacemaker through its strategy of causing irreparable damage to the sight of
civilians with untested weapons.

recommend This comment thread is now closed
Swan
Swan
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 13:53 on January 16th, 2008

Hello Peter,

I've just uploaded three photos for you and boy do those laser weapons look mean!  Calling them 'dazzlers' is simply an attempt by the Army to trivialize it as a weapon.

I understand that new technologies are being developed all the time for the Army to keep our soldiers safe, however I'm not sure that it's of such great merit when it can permanently blind people. 

Then again, if I had a son or brother over in Iraq or Afghanistan, I'd want them to use whatever it takes to stay safe.  GOOD STUFF!

    ~ Swan

 

0
911review

my room-mate is an expert marksman.

He was asked to go to work for Blackwater and be paid $100,000 for 3 months work, they said he would be sitting on top of a biulding picking off Iraqi's.

Supposedly they said it didnt matter who it was.

Under this President the military has been privatized to an extent that we dont know (and neither does congress)

Anyone think its a bit of a coincidence that Rumsfeld could not find 2.3 TRILLION dollars on September 10 2001 ?

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5624554252926849071

 

If you have a hard time beleiving it, watch this video 

 Aegis Video - shooting Iraqi's for fun

These people care nothing for life.

These people have never been held account for this either, read the article as well, its extremely disturbing 

 

Brad 

batcave911.blogspot.com 

http://www.tpmcafe.com/blog/911review 

Video Collections


0
peter.reardon

Hi Swan:

Thanks for the comment. About the technology of laser weapons, they've been around for a few years initially I believe in the guise of flashlights and used on prison populations in the US and elswhere.

I'm not so sure about being more "safe" about being given a taser gun to use.

I wonder about the health downside for anybody using tasers for any length of time: as I pointed out the experts who are critical of their use claim that they have'nt yet been adequately tested.

That or the negative results of tests are not made public, somewhat like drug test results published by multi-national companies about a new product that subsequently has to be pulled from the marketplace.

Agian, thanks for fearsome looking pics.

Peace,

Peter 

0
Dissenter

While in general, I don't like conflict- I highly disagree with your premise on this. While temporary-blindness lasers have limited testing and MAY be unsafe, guns ARE unsafe. If you are replacing something that is known to kill people with something that might hurt people? Well, I can't say it's a great stride but it is a form of incremental improvement.

This line of thought is why we have such a dearth of non-lethal suppression methods. Tons of people say "Sheesh, a sounds like it could hurt someone, we got to stop that!" But I mean, what are we working with instead? Devices that hurl projectiles at high rates of speed, doing devastating damage due to impact and concussive shock. They are certain to cause damage if you use them. If armies can replace guns with less lethal weapons, I have a hard time opposing that.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from