NY Times, Moveon do Dems Dirty Work

by gmony714 | September 13, 2007 at 11:57 am

524 views | 0 Recommendations | 3 comments

By writing off more than half of its normal price, it
encouraged the publication of a nasty hit piece on the honor of a
serving commander in a theater of war. The Paper of Record helped call
Petraeus a traitor, surely one of the worst moments in modern American
media.

The Sulzberger familiy should apologize to General Petraeus and
issue a retraction. Furthermore, it should act to remove Arthur “Pinch”
Sulzberger as publisher of the Times and finally put an adult in charge
of what used to be the nation’s premiere newspaper. Offering
discounts to a rabidly partisan outfit like MoveOn for the purpose of
character assassination has stripped the last fantasies of objectivity
from the paper and exposed it as the fringe-Left shill that it is.

So the NY TIMES paid for half the cost of the ad slandering the top Miltary official in Iraq. This is huge. Now Rudi is asking for the same discount. I guess the Dems are so afraid to speak their minds they must have arms of their party do the dirty work for them. The terrorists will walk all over these guys.

NEW YORK (Reuters) - An ad criticizing the top U.S. general in Iraq raised charges on Thursday that The New York Times slashed its advertising rates for political reasons -- an accusation denied by the paper.

The ad by liberal anti-war group moveon.org ran on Monday, the day of Gen. David Petraeus' testimony to Congress about the war and how long U.S. forces will stay in Iraq.

Moveon.org confirmed it paid $65,000 for the full page ad headlined "General Petraeus or General Betray Us."

The New York Post ran a story on Thursday asking why the basic rate of $181,692 for such an ad was discounted.

"Times Gives Lefties a Hefty Discount for 'Betray Us' Ad," was the headline in the Post, owned by Rupert Murdoch's News Corp.

Times spokeswoman Catherine Mathis denied the rate charged indicated a political bias and said it was the paper's policy not to disclose the rate paid by any advertiser.

"We do not distinguish the advertising rates based on the political content of the ad," Mathis told Reuters.

"The advertising folks did not see the content of the ad before the rate was quoted," she said, adding that there were over 30 different categories of ads with varying rates.

Mathis confirmed the open rate for an ad of that size and type was around $181,000. Among reasons for lower rates are advertisers buying in bulk or taking a standby rate, she said.

"There are many instances when we have published opinion advertisements that run counter to the stance we take on our own editorial pages," she said.

The ad in the main news section of the Times accused Petraeus of "cooking the books for the White House."

It angered Republicans, including Rep. Duncan Hunter of California, a presidential candidate who brought it to the Petraeus hearing on Monday and waved the ad in the air, telling lawmakers he was "irritated" by it and other criticism by Democrats.

Jeff Jarvis, a journalism professor who blogs on media at buzzmachine.com, said the key question for the Times was could any other political or advocacy group get the same rate under the same circumstances.

"The quandary the Times gets stuck in is they don't want to admit you can buy an ad for that rate, no matter who you are," Jarvis said, noting that with print advertising revenues in decline newspapers generally did offer big discounts.

On a more general note, Jarvis said U.S. papers should emulate their counterparts in Britain where, for example, The Guardian makes no effort to hide its liberal stance.

"In the U.S., I would argue newspapers should be more transparent and open about the views taken ... and the (New York) Times is liberal," he said.

Thi is from Rudy Guliani a few minutes ago:

"I call upon the New York Times to give us the same rate--the heavily discounted rate--they gave MoveOn.org for that abominable ad, that was in a very, very coincidental way published on the same day that General Petraeus testified, in which MoveOn.org, which is well known for its character assassination of Republicans, decided to participate in character assasination of an American general in a time of war. This is unprecedented. And we are going to ask the New York Times to allow us tomorrow to print an ad that will obviously take the opposite view. We believe, unlike Hillary Clinton, that General Petraeus is telling the truth."

http://www.weeklystandard.com/weblogs/TWSFP/2007/09/rudy_wants_the_same_rate.asp

NowPublic

World

NY Times, Moveon do Dems Dirty Work

Photos