Reports Of Nooses Appearing Across U.S., As Police Investigate Episode At Columbia University, A Rash Of Other Incidents Reporte

by angryindian | October 11, 2007 at 02:22 pm | 1495 views | 23 comments

I have yet to hear the neo-conservative far-right in the United States that swears on the Christian deity of wrath that anti-African racism is long dead say a word about this.  Not only are African students subject to such attacks, but even teh institutions instructors if they are the wrong colour.  - The Angryindian

-------------------------------------------------------------------

Police were exploring whether a noose left on a black professor at Columbia University professor's office door could have been the work of a disappointed student or a hostile colleague, a police official said.

Authorities were testing the 4-foot-long twine noose for DNA evidence, but had no suspects in the highly charged episode at the Ivy League campus.

"I'm upset that our community has been exposed to such an unbelievably vile incident," the professor, Madonna Constantine, told hundreds of faculty and students who held a raucous rally Wednesday. She described the incident as a "blatant act of racism" and said it "reeks of cowardice and fear."

Nooses - reviled as symbols of lynchings in the Old South - have been showing up in other incidents around the country lately. Last year in Jena, La., three white students hung nooses from a big oak tree outside the high school, inflaming racial tensions. Other nooses have cropped up at the U.S. Coast Guard Academy and the Hempstead Police Department locker room.

Morris Dees, founder and chief legal counsel for the Southern Poverty Law Center, has been tracking incidents like this for 35 years.

"It's popping up all over the place," Dees told CBS Early Show Co-Anchor Harry Smith. "I think maybe Jena, Louisiana, possibly has caused some copycat situations."

Thousands of demonstrators, including the Revs. Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton, converged on Jena on Sept. 20 to decry what they called a racist double standard in the justice system. They protested the way six blacks were arrested on attempted murder charges in the beating of a white student, while three whites were suspended but not prosecuted for hanging nooses in a tree in August 2006.

The noose evokes the lynchings of the Jim Crow South and "is a symbol that can be deployed with no ambiguity. People understand exactly what it means," said William Jelani Cobb, a professor of black American history at Spelman College in Atlanta.

Add a comment Comments (23)

jordan
good stuff:

Thanks for posting this, though I honestly wish you didn't have to. It's like some sort of brain-plague sweeping the nation (or, more accurately, a dormant virus coming back to life).

Karen Hatter
good stuff:

As always, Angryindian, thanks. Good analogies, plague and virus, Jordan. In the case of a virus, how virulent the strain is what should be of most concern.

Kaitlin
good stuff:

It's interesting--similar to school shootings, one act of faceless racism seems to inspire many, many more. A writer named Loren Coleman wrote an entire book about this called The Copycat Effect, but I prefer his other term for it: cluster. Clusters are found all over in society, and the term has to it a messy, organic, disease-like feel; it's similar to "viral." This is a suitable way to describe how people react in these scenarios: suddenly every closet racist or kid with a grudge feels like permission has been granted for them to go out and commit an act. The act has already been initiated, so why not continue? It's like a mob mentality pandemic.

So if this is the case, what is needed might be something like a vaccine...but what would that be?

Tom van B
good stuff:

angryindian, This is deeply disturbing.

BigT

One problem: why blame neoconservatives when liberals were throwing Oreos on the stage in 2002 to suggest Michael Steele was acting like an Uncle Tom?

angryindian

Tossing cookies and displaying nooses are not the same thing.  And you know that.

phrolen

 The racial baiting continues om all sides in the never ending quest for more free stuff. Any sane person in America knows that this country has moved on, face it, America has embraced integration and cultural diversity, while the hate mongers contunue to sell this sad old party line in the name of making community leaders MILLIONS. Sure the knee jerk reaction is to blame it on the conservatives, when all the while liberal intellectuals continue to propogate ideals that relegate cultural masses deeper into obscurity. "The soft bigotry of low expectations." I (as a white male conservative American) am so sick of being blamed every time some wacko commits an inexcusable, offensible act. You know what that is Angry Indian THAT IS STERO TYPING, THAT IS RACIST. "Oh another noose, mustve been one of those right wingers." The democratic party in this country has an admitted member of the Ku Klux Klan in its senior leadership, have you ever read accounts of how Hillary Clinton treats minoritys (Dereliction of duty by Col, Buzz Patterson) LBJ the father of liberal progressivism once was quoted as saying that his civil rights initiatives would have the ni****s voting democratic 40 years. The man who is defending the Jena 6 Malik Shabazz is a self admitted anti-semit who has been quoted as "Hating white people" and shouting "Black Power." The social organization that you yourself belong to "The Nation of Gods and Earths" IS A RACIST ORGANIZATION. Tenant # 7 in the nine basic principles of the 5% doctrine "The Black Man is God and his proper name is Allah." The mainstream in this country has moved on, it is time for the radicals to move on as well. Stop the hate mongering!

PEP

Good comments, phrolen.

The organization "Nation of Gods and Earths" is the flip side of the KKK. AngryIndian, I think that fighting what you believe to be racism with racism is like trying to stop rock-throwing by getting your own rocks.

Will racism ever cease on this planet? A few decades back, I might have said and believed "yes." I was very young, very committed, and very naive. Now I understand that we can never legislate all people everywhere. Will racism ever cease? No. That's a hard cold fact.

So, what to do? In the U.S., we have a history of moving beyond older ways that were wrong, and of working to fix them. I see the U.S. as organic, growing--and like a child, the things that were "the way we do things" in the 1700's and on up through the ages grow and change with maturity and changing times.

Is everything perfect? No. Will it ever be? No. But we do live in a nation that fixes things--and now it seems as though people and systems that have worked to make things better are routinely bullied by those who don't want to give up the cult of professional victimology. (This is a sociological statement, not a personal one.)

I remember segregation. I remember when women couldn't get jobs "meant for men." Now I see a world where blacks, women, and other minorities are routinely at the head of government jobs and doing everything you can imagine, from being astronauts to judges to researchers to doctors to--you name it. I remember days before certain legislations, and OEO and all the legislative and legal safeguards in effect today.

But now we're at risk again, because physics work, even if it's sociological physics. For every action, there's an equal and opposite reaction. When certain groups insist on living as though they are afflicted right now by being actual slaves, or by segregation, and routinely launch large-scale attacks to gain attention and attack those not in their preferred group, they create distrust and hate.

Right now, the groups like "Nations of Gods and Earth" are spinning up racial divides and hate. Why?

Let's grab up the KKK types, the "Nations of God and Earth" and similiar types, the neo-Nazi's, the radical Islamists, and send 'em all to camp together where they can't get away from each other and have to survive together in the wilderness. My bet would be this: they'd find out that they are very much alike. In fact, the nouns in their rhetoric and hate just change according to which divisive, hate group someone advocates.  You can take the rhetoric of any of the group and just change out nouns:  black, white, Jews, Christians, Muslims. 

It's all the same message: hate, division and destruction.  

 

angryindian

Why not add the American Indian Movement to this list?  They are called Indian Nazis, aren't they for standing up for Native rights.  Ask the FBI.  Ask Peltier.  In fact, where are Zionists on this list?  Honestly PEP, what is your level of knowledge of the Five Percent Nation?  Other than me, what other people with direct experience with the philosophy have you spoken with about the 5pct'ers or what they are about?  What is your source of information?  It seems that you have simply and nonchalantly made connections where they do not and never have existed.  Equating the 5pct'er's with the most violent organised racists in history is not just wildly inaccurate but ignorant of the history, causes and aims of the philosophy.  And for the record, the 5pct Nation can not be understood by reading Wikipedia or listening to rap which the 5pct Nation predates.  It must be learned from within the cultural paradigms that gave it birth from the people that live it.

Where I grew up, the Gods were the men opposing the drug dealers, leading rallies for employment, helping ex-cons get adjusted to society.  Your cursory dismissal of the movement as a racial power group is entirely missing the point.  I am deeply disturbed by your rush to link this philosophy with the overt and admitted violence of White racist groups in the U.S.   Has the Five Percent Nation lynched Whites in this country?  Has this "organisation" that does not exist as an organised body bombed European churches in America?  Killed people trying to register voters in traditionally and violently marginalised areas?  Have adherents to the philosophy planned to eradicate the entire population of European America?  Read the FBI files on Father Allah and see if they were ever behind any form of violence towards White Americans.  If your commentary was true, like the Black Panther Party for Self Defense which was a defensive organisation rather than just  angry Black men walking around with guns, the 5pct Nation would have been destroyed by the feds decades ago.  The Klan still exists because the legal arm of the U.S. has allowed them to.   Also, If they were as dedicated to violence as you wrongfully assume, I doubt the philosophy and its leader would have been able to garner offical support from NYC's City Hall, a relationship that exists to this day.  

Aside from the erroneous police and mainstream media 5pct association tagging two isolated nutcases that sniped and killed several people a few years ago, outside of the NYC project developments, no one, especially most White people did not even know such a group even existed.  And in one post you linked an entire philosphy that has existed quite peacefully since the 1960's with the most extremist White power organisations in the Unted States.  Groups that have used systematic racial violence to pursue their goals and promises to return to violence to solve the current race issues in this country.  I would suggest  that when you are investigating an African liberation philosophy to study it within its own unique cultural and historical paradigm.  Not via the perspective of the oppressive system 5pct philosophy correctly views as antagonistic to the survival of African people in this country.  If someone made such connection between Native organisations and organised hate groups like the American KKK, you would take issue.

angryindian

First off, pretending that pro-Europocentric racism is a thing of the past is painfully disingenuous.  In fact, that suggestion is not even worth addressing when you and I both know that Whites in this country have always sought to maintain social control in their favour and have used violence to do so.  To say that this is not true and has no bearing in the modern day is willing ignorance, much like Japan's denial of the Rape of Naking.

Second, don't assume that I am a democrat or a liberal.  I know full well that the southern democratic party fought hard to maintain slavery, worked night and day to defend Jim Crow and it was a democratic president, LBJ that sold out the the Mississippi Freedom Democratic Party at the 1964 Democratic convention and called its leader grassroots African activist Fannie Lou Hamer "that illiterate woman".   You aren't telling me anything I don't already know.  Don't make the mistake of jumping to conclusions about my political leanings.  I do not lean left.  I said it before and I will say it again, My political position is Indigenist.  A philosophy that ignores western political definitions in favour of Aboriginal paradigms.

Third, you have been around NP long enough to have learned or at least read by now that I am not a "member" of the Five Percent Nation of Gods and Earths.  That is a stereotype Phrolen, not my analysis that points out that whether democrat or republican the motive behind the hanging of nooses is a return to unchallenged White Power, in other words, a quite "conservative" perspective that maintains that America was better off when Africans could be extra-judicially murdered.  If you are going to use a revolutionary African Diasporic philosophy as a metaphor to establish an argument that racism is an equal-opportunity affair, sir, you are insulting my intelligence.  And frankly, if you could go beyond the provocative language you would understand that the allegory maintains that all human beings are of African descent and that Europeans are the youngest members of that family.  The "grafting" story is just that, a story.  I have never known a practising 5pct individual who really believes White people are literally "Devils".  But we do recognise that when dealing with our people historically here and elsewhere, White folks have been unabashedly evil and expect us to kiss you arses for the attention.

My acknowledgment of the 5pct'ers is strictly political as that is the basis of the philosophy.  I merely recognise the legitimacy of a movement that provides an allegorical blueprint for African survival in the United States.   How you can view "The Black Man is God and his proper name is Allah" and the struggle for "Black Power" as racist is beyond me.  The last time I went to a Christian church the image of Jesus the Christ was distinctively European, a scientific impossiblity.  And the call for Black Power is not at all the same as the war-cry of "White Power" as typified by Europeans.  We were only seeking to empower our respective communites, White supremacists seek the eradication of all non-Europeans here and elsewhere.  Read their literature.  I do. 

As someone who has grown up with the teachings of Allah the Father, (Clarence 13X) and the unpleasant experience of facing White racism on a visceral level, the 5 percent perspective is a rational and revolutionary African philosophical  response to centuries of murderous colonialist abuse by Europeans who have actively and violently stripped us of knowledge of ourselves, our personal security and our identities in favour of White power and unearned White privilege.  A privilege you are now claiming by demanding that traditional and historical White American racial bias be ignored because you as a self-identified White male are tired of hearing about it.  If enough sincere White people worked to truly eradicate ethnic bias perhaps you would have less to hear from Africans fed up with excuses as to why we should ignore cases like this.  It is not for you or any other non-African to define how we are supposed to feel and respond to what has and continues to happen to us as a people.   We make that choice, not you.

Instead of taking the easy way out by playing the role of a victimised but well-meaning population of purely benevolent-minded and culturally exceptional Euro-Americans who have always fought for liberation and democracy while Indians were killed and our women sterilised and Africans were beaten and killed for trying to enjoy their civil rights to education, employment and the ballot box, admit to America's issues with its racialist history, work to change the sordid relationships between marginalised sectors and the mainstream and stop pretending that when Africans and other non-Whites stand up for themselves it means that we automatically hate you and all other White people.  It is ridicuous and divisive.

If White society is that sensitive, then the mainstream of the Europocentric world needs to get over its outdated delusions of self-importance instead of telling us to cope with your insecurities.  Work to stop the bias, not the people defending themselves against a long-standing tradition of discrimination you do not and will not experience.  Did it ever occur to you that many of us are tired of having to live our lives dictated by White refusal to admit to this country's racist history?  How much more are we supposed to put up with?  How much would you put up with?  You would be surprised how many Africans would be willing to struggle for real justice since you seem to not remember that there was an entire movement in this country to make America change.  To suggest that the White American public was and is as a people wholly supportive and embracing of this goal is revisionist and intentionally misleading.  It is also insulting to the many thousands of people who have given their all and lie in unmarked graves forgotten by a country still living on its unearned reputation for justice and brotherhood regardless of ethnicity.   But then again, we had to argue with White America to simply be recognised as human.  How quickly White American forgets...

 


juan114

This is a racist post shame!!

Christopher Byrne
good stuff:

First off I have to say that this behaviour is repugnant and the pattern is hopefully only that of "copycats" or a very small minority.

But I want us all to be honest here and acknowledge that racism in this country is not only in one direction. How often do Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton pull out the race card and fail to apologize when they are so far off the mark (think Tawana Brawley and the Duke Lacrosse Team)? 

I have been in the south for over 13 years and have experienced quite a deal of black on white racism here. I think back to 1994 when my West Indian born and raised wife was studying Social Work. She and another student went to a meeting of the Black Student Association, and they were asked to leave by the Vice-President of Diversity for the University. Why? Because they were White, and he felt that the students at the meeting would feel intimidated and afraid to speak. She was floored and had never experienced anything like that in her life.

On the other hand, I have also been floored by the racist rantings I have heard from white people down here, and I have experienced anti-semitism by people who think I am Jewish because of my appearance. I have been called "Jewboy" and "Heb" on the streets. For the record, I am Irish-American and have a sign at home that reads "Irish Need Not Apply" as a reminder to take nothing for granted.

Before I came South, I worked for a US Federal Agency as a team leader. I had a black woman that worked for me. A Jamaican-born woman in the office kept trying to get her to undercut me because I was white, and the only reason I got the job was because I was white. Thankfully my team member would not take her on and told her to pound sand because i was the fairest boss she had ever had. I will always rememeber her for her courage instanding up to the office bully.

This same bully was in a meeting with me when I was thoroughly chewing out a program manager for an illegal action he had taken under a contract I was managing and would have been held accountable on. She said, and I quote, "You should not be so hard on him because he has so much stress on him because he is black."! My response to her was simple and would be the same today as it was then: "I do not care of he is black, white, pink or green. He broke the law and put us all at risk, so get out of my office now!" 

Until we own that fact that there is racism everywhere, nobody will take the Jesse "New York City is Hymietown" Jackson or Al Sharpton seriously. Only then can a real dialog take place. Until then, the incidents of a marginal few in society will win the day, and no positive change will occur.

angryindian

Chris, everything you just said was fine, but how many times are we to be reminded that Rev. Jackson said something stupid while I'm told to forget and forgive Imus, Beck, Limbaugh, Horowitz and a whole host of others who do this in national media on a regular basis?  The Brawley incident was infortunate, but pulling that out everytime Africans in this country stand up to White racism is insulting.  And if you are going to despise Rev. Sharpton, I can suggest a list of Zionist rabbi's on Israel National Radio that are ten times worse when they discuss Arabs and activists that oppose Israeli policies.  The Duke case "may" have been a false flag, but they also have a well known reputation for mistreating young women at their parties according to the very same mainstream news agenices that brought  us Tawana Brawley.  I wasn't there during the alleged assault and as far as I know neither were you.  But the fact that the DA felt compelled to announce these men "completely innocent" smacks of institutional American anti-African bias.  How often does a District Attorney tell the public that the accused was without a doubt innocent, leaving themselves open to lawsuits? 

We just had a case of an African woman beaten, raped and tortured by six White racists in West Virginia.  Are you and others here on NP going to hold up "Brawley Lied" signs to say that such treament is equal across the board so we should just forget about it and move on? 

Christopher Byrne

Imus has paid his price, but was it a fair price, especially when I was out in LA a few months ago and saw a business card in my hotel lobby for a black-owned hair salon advertising services to "bring out your nappiness"? Is he a racist? I do not know. Is he a sexist? I do not know. Was he stupid? Yes.

The woman in West Virginia was black, not African. It would even be wrong to describe her as African-American, because I know of many white people born and raised in Africa that now live in the United States. Do you know that they were racists, and that was the motive of their crime? What first hand evidence do YOU have to support that statement? Sure, they are probably white trash, and they kidnapped and raped a WOMAN. That should be the first concern, not the color of her skin.

You also say it is unfair to label Jesse Jackson for a remark that he made and aplogized for. Yet you do not give Imus the same benefit of the doubt. No matter the color of their skin, Jackson, Sharpton and Imus ALL have credibility issues because of what they have said and done, and apologized for.

Let's look at the assemblages of Sharpton's behavior over the years, as assembled by black radio host Larry Elder, and tell me if he is a racist:

TAX EVASION: In a
1988 interview, Sharpton said he saw no reason why blacks should pay
taxes. “If we do not have a justice system that protects us, what are
we paying for?” Sharpton has faced multiple charges—and one
conviction—of tax evasion.

TAWANA BRAWLEY: 1987. Al Sharpton, during the infamous Tawana
Brawley case, falsely accused a former assistant district attorney of
raping and sodomizing Ms. Brawley. Young Tawana stated that white
racists abducted, raped, and sodomized her, scrawling the initials
“KKK” on her in human feces. A grand jury later found the entire
incident a complete hoax. Most likely, Ms. Brawley, afraid of
punishment for staying out too late, fabricated the entire story. This
did not stop Reverend Al Sharpton, who accused Pagones an assistant
district attorney, of the crime. “We stated openly that Steven Pagones
did it. If we’re lying, sue us, so we can go into court with you and
prove you did it. Sue us—sue us right now.

Pagones did. After receiving death threats, and threats against his
child, Pagones sued Sharpton and two others for defamation. A jury
unanimously concluded that Sharpton defamed Pagones, ordering Sharpton
to pay $65,000 to Pagones. The Reverend promptly announced his
intention not to pay. A couple years later, Sharpton’s buddies passed
the hat and paid off Sharpton’s debt, which totaled $87,000 with
interest and penalties. To this day, never having paid one penny of his
own to Pagones, Sharpton refuses to apologize, “I did what I
believed….They are asking me to grovel. They want black children to say
they forced a black man coming out of the hard-core ghetto to his
knees….Once you begin bending, it’s ‘did you bend today?’ or ‘I missed
the apology, say it again.’ Once you start compromising, you lose
respect for yourself.”

CENTRAL PARK JOGGER: In 1989 “the jogger,” a young white woman, was
monstrously raped and nearly beaten to death in Central Park. Sharpton
insisted—despite the defendants’ confessions—that her black attackers
were innocent, modern-day Scottsboro Boys trapped in “a fit of racial
hysteria.” Sharpton charged that the jogger’s boyfriend did it, and
organized protests outside the courthouse, chanting, “The boyfriend did
it!” and denouncing the victim as “Whore!” He brought Tawana Brawley to
the trial, to show her “white justice” and arranged for her to meet the
attackers. Sharpton appealed for a psychiatrist to examine the victim,
generously saying, “It doesn’t even have to be a black
psychiatrist….We’re not endorsing the damage to the girl—if there was
this damage.” (While it doesn’t excuse his calling the victim a “whore”
and denigrating any damage to her, or his accusations against the
boyfriend, the convictions of the accused were eventually vacated,
despite their taped confessions, after another man—whose DNA
matched—confessed to the rape in 2002.)

CROWN HEIGHTS/ “DIAMOND MERCHANTS”: In 1991, Gavin Cato, a
seven-year-old black child was killed in a traffic accident in Crown
Heights (in Brooklyn), when a car driven by a Hasidic Jew went out of
control. Sharpton turned it into a racial incident. Sharpton led 400
protesters through the Jewish section of Crown Heights, with one
protester holding a sign that read, “The White Man Is the Devil.” There
were four nights of rock- and bottle-throwing, and a young Talmudic
scholar was surrounded by a mob shouting, “Kill the Jew” and stabbed to
death. A hundred others were injured. Sharpton said, “The world will
tell us that [Gavin Cato] was killed by accident….What type of city do
we have that would allow politics to rise above the blood of innocent
babies?…Talk about how Oppenheimer in South Africa sends diamonds
straight to Tel Aviv and deals with the diamond merchants right here in
Crown Heights….All we want to say is what Jesus said: If you offend one
of these little ones, you got to pay for it. No compromise. Pay for
your deeds.” Later Sharpton said, “If the Jews want to get it on, tell
them to pin their yarmulkes back and come over to my house.”

ARAFAT: When Sharpton announced a 2001 trip to the Middle East,
Rabbi Shmuley Boteach helped plan his itinerary. Sharpton, according to
the Rabbi, promised not to meet with Yassir Arafat, yet only days
later, Jewish New Yorkers opened the morning paper to see a smiling
Arafat and Sharpton, meeting and shaking hands in Israel. Furious,
Rabbi Boteach said, “Prior to our recent trip to Israel, U.S. black
leader Reverend Al Sharpton and I discussed several times that there
were to be no meetings with Arab or Palestinian leaders, not because I
wished to set preconditions for our travel, but because the express
objective of our mission was to show solidarity with Israeli victims of
terror. The idea was to provide a magnanimous gesture of friendship and
solidarity with the Jewish nation that would hopefully have strong
reverberations for the relationship of the Jewish and black communities
back home.”

FREDDY’S FASHION MART/”WHITE INTERLOPER”: 1995. A Jewish store owner
in Harlem was accused of driving a black record store owner out of
business, when the United House of Prayer, one of the largest black
landlords on 125th Street, raised the rent on the Fashion Mart owned by
a Jew, Freddy Harari, who then raised the rent on his subtenant,
Sikhulu Shange, who ran a record store. At one of many rallies meant to
scare the Jewish owner away, Sharpton said, “…There is a systematic and
methodical strategy to eliminate our people from doing business off
125th Street. I want to make it clear…that we will not stand by and
allow them to move this brother so that some white interloper can
expand his business.” Following a demonstration three months later, one
of the protestors, a black man, stormed Freddy’s Fashion Mart with a
pistol, screaming, “It’s on now! All blacks out!” In addition to
shooting, he set fire to the building, eventually killing himself and
seven others. Initially, Sharpton denied having spoken at any rallies.
When tapes surfaced, he said, “What’s wrong with denouncing white
interlopers?” Eventually, he apologized—but only for saying “white,”
not “interloper.”

CRIMINAL JUSTICE: During the “Million Man March” in Washington,
civil rights “activist” Al Sharpton thundered, “O.J. is home, but Mumia
Abu Jamal ain’t home. And we won’t stop till all of our people that
need a chance in an awkward and unbalanced criminal justice system can
come home.”

OUT OF THE KING MOVEMENT: Although he was 14 when Martin Luther King
was assassinated, Sharpton claims he “came out of the King movement.”
Sharpton once explained, “I was on some show this week, and people
said, ‘Why don’t you just let it go? Why don’t y’all just get over it?’
Get over what? Get over Dr. King dying? Get over Medger Evers dying?
Get over Goodman, Chaney and Schwerner dying? Get over those four girls
in Birmingham dying? We are never gonna get over it, and we are never
gonna let you forget it!”

FBI TAPES/COCAINE: In 2002, HBO aired a 19-year-old FBI surveillance
of Sharpton with self-described mobster Michael Franzese and an
undercover FBI agent posing as a Latin American businessman. The three
were discussing promoting boxing matches and musical events. HBO’s
“Real Sports” got a hold of a hidden camera video that shows undercover
agent Victor Quintana posing as a drug dealer trying to convince
Sharpton to play a middleman in a big cocaine buy.

Sharpton asks the undercover agent, “What kind of time limit are we dealing with?”

“Coke?” the agent asks.

“Yeah.” Sharpton says.

The phony drug dealer says, “Could be about the same time we have 4 million coming to us.”

Sharpton: “End of April?”

“End of April. Six weeks from now. Is that a good time you think?” the agent asks.

“Probably,” Sharpton replies.

The deal never went down, and Sharpton has said he was just playing
along because he was scared of the would-be kingpin. “And I'm in his
office. I don't know whether this man is armed. I don't know what's
going on. So I kind of say, ‘Yeah, yeah, yeah,’ to get out of there,”
Sharpton claimed the tape was leaked by law enforcement officials to
disrupt his 2004 presidential run, and he sued HBO, its parent company
AOL Time Warner, and several individuals who worked on the story. No
charges were ever brought against Sharpton because of the tape, which
was allegedly made to get Sharpton to act as an informant for the feds
into an investigation into corruption by Don King and the boxing
industry. The HBO report featured former Mafia captain Michael Franzese
saying that the FBI was on the right track when it targeted Sharpton in
a sting back in 1983 to try and root out corruption in boxing.

Later on, the undercover agent offers Sharpton a finder's fee for
help with the drug deal and says to Sharpton, “I can get pure coke for
about $35,000 a kilo ... Every kilogram we bring in, $3,500 to you. How
does that sound?” Sharpton nods in response.

The deal never went down, and Sharpton has said he was just playing
along because he was scared of the would-be kingpin. “And I'm in his
office. I don't know whether this man is armed. I don't know what's
going on. So I kind of say, ‘Yeah, yeah, yeah,’ to get out of there,”
Sharpton claimed the tape was leaked by law enforcement officials to
disrupt his 2004 presidential run, and he sued HBO, its parent company
AOL Time Warner, and several individuals who worked on the story. No
charges were ever brought against Sharpton because of the tape, which
was allegedly made to get Sharpton to act as an informant for the feds
into an investigation into corruption by Don King and the boxing
industry. The HBO report featured former Mafia captain Michael Franzese
saying that the FBI was on the right track when it targeted Sharpton in
a sting back in 1983 to try and root out corruption in boxing.

Sharpton admitted in 1988 that he informed for the government in
order “to get rid of drugs and election fraud” in black neighborhoods.
He denied informing on civil rights leaders and organized crime figures.

FBI TAPES/DONATIONS: After Sharpton’s name surfaced on wiretaps in
an unrelated Philadelphia City Hall corruption case, the FBI launched a
probe into Sharpton’s fund-raising for his failed 2004 presidential
run. The FBI secretly videotaped Sharpton on May 9, 2003, pocketing
campaign donations from two “shady fund-raisers” in a NY City hotel
room, and then demanding $25,000 more. The two fund-raisers were La-Van
Hawkins and the late Ronald White. Hawkins is currently on trial in
Philadelphia on corruption charges. White was going to be indicted, but
died before charges were brought. A later wiretap recorded Hawkins
telling White that they had raised more than $140,000 for Sharpton the
previous quarter, but Hawkins was concerned that Sharpton had only
reported about $50,000 to the Federal Election Commission, as required
by law. Sharpton said the allegations were a “politically motivated
smokescreen” to hide the fact the Justice Department is out to get him.
He ripped the probe and the secret videotaping, saying, “Can you
imagine what would happen if it was a white presidential candidate?”


You may also want to read Elder's 2005 column, "The Race card -- 2005"

Race baiting serves anyone any good. Plain and simple.

angryindian

First Chris, as someone who is not of African descent, do not assume the right to tell us how we should identify ourselves. What gives you to the right to define what we call ourselves? Please refrain from that. It is highly offensive and has no direct connection to the issue at hand. I am actually quite bewildered as to why you felt you needed to lecture to me, a proud African, as to how African people in this country should term themselves. And when we use "nappy" we understand its meaning. "Stupid" is a general invective as well, but if your pal uses it with you within an agreed and understood context, it is quite permissible. If the card was for an African hair salon which specializes in African hair, who else would you expect the ad to be tailored to? Straight-haired Europeans who don't need the special chemicals that makes our curly hair unravel?

And in the case of the woman who was abused in West Virginia, she reported that they called her a nigger repeatedly while they were stabbing her with a knife. What else do you need to accept that anti-African racism was a factor in this crime. They reportedly told her that, "This is what we do to niggers here." Look it up yourself: http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2007/0911071logansix1.html

Second, I never said that Imus didn't apologise. I'm saying that Imus and the others of his ilk do this repeatedly without anyone of authority saying anything negative about it. Rev. Jackson as far as I am aware was caught saying one stupid thing during a private conversation with an African reporter who went to press with the quote. He was not on a public forum, this was his bias against New York Jewry. Imus and the other neo-conservative pundits have national reach and syndication, media access that is fairly dominated by corporate, anti-progressive interests. Not the radical African anti-racism activists that supposedly live under every rock in America.

Third, please don't assume that I "like" Rev. Sharpton. I am a Brooklyn, NY native born and bred and know more about the crooked side of Al Sharpton than may ever be revealed to the mainstream public. As a community minister of a small church in "tha Hood," the Rev. Sharpton was literally chased out of his own neighbourhood due to issues I will choose not to list here for lack of empirical evidence. He is no hero in many parts of Brooklyn, but is admired and respected for bringing attention to situations and issues the mainstream chose to ignore like police brutality and extra-judicial beatings and killings. And again, it is not for people outside of the community to define who we as a group speak for us. Even if he is shady.

Christopher Byrne

I am not trying to assume anything, I am just making my own observation. People can call themselves whatever they want, but the bottom line is we are all Americans and we need to look beyond labels that divide rather than unite.

We also need to avoid double standards on all sides. Why is it offensive for me to say something, but not someone else to do the same in the other direction?

A few years ago, the former Mayor of Atlanta, Maynard Jackson, died. He was the first Black/African/African American (pick whatever term you want that makes you comfortable). There was an immediate call to rename Hartsfield Airport Maynard Jackson Airport. People who were opposed this were automatically labeled racists. But was it racist of the Hartsfield family to want to keep the name of the person who actually got the airport built on the airport? Not in my book, but if I said that publicly, I would be called a racist. In the end, it was renamed Hartsfield-Jackson International Airport which is what should have been the answer from the start, honoring BOTH men who oversaw the construction and growth of the facility.

Take a read of this blog entry by a guy named the "grouchy old cripple". I am not saying I agree with his tone and wording, but his underlying point about racial politics in Atlanta is spot on. It is sad to say that we cannot call Cynthia McKinney a raving lunatic without being called racist.

Jesse Jackson may have said that in what he thought was a private conversation, but why does he have to run into every situation and call out the race card, especially when race has nothing to do with the given incident?

We will have to disagree at this time, because this is better a discussion over a draft or a coffee or whatever. 

angryindian

First Chris, as someone who is not of African descent, do not assume the right to tell us how we should identify ourselves. What gives you to the right to define what we call ourselves? Please refrain from that. It is highly offensive and has no direct connection to the issue at hand. I am actually quite bewildered as to why you felt you needed to lecture to me, a proud African, as to how African people in this country should term themselves. And when we use "nappy" we understand its meaning. "Stupid" is a general invective as well, but if your pal uses it with you within an agreed and understood context, it is quite permissible. If the card was for an African hair salon which specializes in African hair, who else would you expect the ad to be tailored to? Straight-haired Europeans who don't need the special chemicals that makes our curly hair unravel?

And in the case of the woman who was abused in West Virginia, she reported that they called her a nigger repeatedly while they were stabbing her with a knife. What else do you need to accept that anti-African racism was a factor in this crime. They reportedly told her that, "This is what we do to niggers here." Look it up yourself: http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2007/0911071logansix1.html

Second, I never said that Imus didn't apologise. I'm saying that Imus and the others of his ilk do this repeatedly without anyone of authority saying anything negative about it. Rev. Jackson as far as I am aware was caught saying one stupid thing during a private conversation with an African reporter who went to press with the quote. He was not on a public forum, this was his bias against New York Jewry. Imus and the other neo-conservative pundits have national reach and syndication, media access that is fairly dominated by corporate, anti-progressive interests. Not the radical African anti-racism activists that supposedly live under every rock in America.

Third, please don't assume that I "like" Rev. Sharpton. I am a Brooklyn, NY native born and bred and know more about the crooked side of Al Sharpton than may ever be revealed to the mainstream public. As a community minister of a small church in "tha Hood," the Rev. Sharpton was literally chased out of his own neighbourhood due to issues I will choose not to list here for lack of empirical evidence. He is no hero in many parts of Brooklyn, but is admired and respected for bringing attention to situations and issues the mainstream chose to ignore like police brutality and extra-judicial beatings and killings. And again, it is not for people outside of the community to define who we as a group speak for us. Even if he is shady.

angryindian

First Chris, as someone who is not of African descent, do not assume the right to tell us how we should identify ourselves. What gives you to the right to define what we call ourselves? Please refrain from that. It is highly offensive and has no direct connection to the issue at hand. I am actually quite bewildered as to why you felt you needed to lecture to me, a proud African, as to how African people in this country should term themselves. And when we use "nappy" we understand its meaning. "Stupid" is a general invective as well, but if your pal uses it with you within an agreed and understood context, it is quite permissible. If the card was for an African hair salon which specializes in African hair, who else would you expect the ad to be tailored to? Straight-haired Europeans who don't need the special chemicals that makes our curly hair unravel?

And in the case of the woman who was abused in West Virginia, she reported that they called her a nigger repeatedly while they were stabbing her with a knife. What else do you need to accept that anti-African racism was a factor in this crime. They reportedly told her that, "This is what we do to niggers here." Look it up yourself: http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2007/0911071logansix1.html

Second, I never said that Imus didn't apologise. I'm saying that Imus and the others of his ilk do this repeatedly without anyone of authority saying anything negative about it. Rev. Jackson as far as I am aware was caught saying one stupid thing during a private conversation with an African reporter who went to press with the quote. He was not on a public forum, this was his bias against New York Jewry. Imus and the other neo-conservative pundits have national reach and syndication, media access that is fairly dominated by corporate, anti-progressive interests. Not the radical African anti-racism activists that supposedly live under every rock in America.

Third, please don't assume that I "like" Rev. Sharpton. I am a Brooklyn, NY native born and bred and know more about the crooked side of Al Sharpton than may ever be revealed to the mainstream public. As a community minister of a small church in "tha Hood," the Rev. Sharpton was literally chased out of his own neighbourhood due to issues I will choose not to list here for lack of empirical evidence. He is no hero in many parts of Brooklyn, but is admired and respected for bringing attention to situations and issues the mainstream chose to ignore like police brutality and extra-judicial beatings and killings. And again, it is not for people outside of the community to define who we as a group speak for us. Even if he is shady.

juan114

I must say confronting this racist type posting has cost some their membership those know of who we speak. Those that have been brave enough to confront the racist poster have paid a price.5% is racist and some must confront it. For some reason his racism goes unchallenged something that would get anyone else banned. It is out of fear of being called racist. That is why the poster gets away with his racist statements and manifestos.In fact some have lost their wrangler status for less.I think my membership is now in trouble for speaking out but others have already suffered for my opinions to be heard.

phrolen

Did it ever occur to me that you were tired ofhaving your life dictated by Whites refusing to admit the racist past of this nation? ........Did I miss something Indian or did'nt the nation vote overwhelmingly to crush institutional racism. We even amended the constitution. Call all of that what you will, but since black folks only encompass about 13% of the nation now, we can extrapolate our thought and reach the reasonable conclusion that an overwhelming number of white americans must have indeed not only admitted to the existence of racism, but had the significant moral outcry in order to enact legislation to stop it. How hard is it to amend the constitution? I personally think it is racism that continually percipitates this blame "White denial" mindset, and is merely another tactic meant at intimidating and dominating. DID YOU REALLY JUST DEFEND THE BLACK PANTHERS? A group that has repeatedly helf racist and anti-semetic beliefs. Malik Shabazz is the leader of the new black panthers and I have heard him say blatantly racist statements LIVE with my own ears. Did you also just say that the chant "Black power" was not a racist statement. DOES ANYONE HERE BELIEVE THAT SHOUTING POWER TO YOUR OWN RACE IS NOT RACIST? It is the epitimay of racsim my friend. Oh and perscribing to a religion that declares your race as god; That has nothing to do with the artistic rendition that is commonly accepted to symbolize Jesus. There is no where in the bible that declares the White man is god. An actual tenant of this religous doctrine declares Black man as God. That is racist, if Black man is God then well its pretty implicit that all others are beneath God. Please dont try and feed me with the line that everyone is a God, if that was truly the case then why did the religous founders specify Black man. Regardless, others have moved on THE VAST MAJORITY. Only the radicals are still hanging on and profiting hugely from keeping the hate alive.

angryindian

You are so wrong about the Black Panther Party that it is shocking. Jim Crow happened long after the 13th, 14th and 15th consitutional amendments were passed. And since then we have had Jim Crow, the Klan, institutional racial discrimination in schools, (Brown vs. Board of Education) segregated military service, (my Navy father wasn't allowed to work anywhere but the galley) lynching terrorism and the glass wall that kept out all but the White Anglo-Saxons who happened not to be Catholic and in many cases women, of any race. This is just the short list. Black Power was a call for community power in the face of dogs being sicked on African people trying to vote in the United States, or to go to school with White people. What is it that upsets you about African people empowering themselves? Does Zionism bother you as well?

In 2000, the state of Florida violated the voting rights of numerous African men registered to vote democrat by purposefully listing them as felons. The investigation conducted by the state voting commission admitted errors and vowed to never let it happen again. It did in Florida and Ohio in 2004. Where was the U.S. constitution in these cases? Where was justice?

Your lack of knowledge, or wilful ignorance, of these issues is appalling.

Christopher Byrne

You write

"In 2000, the state of Florida violated the voting rights of numerous
African men registered to vote democrat by purposefully listing them as
felons. The investigation conducted by the state voting commission
admitted errors and vowed to never let it happen again. It did in
Florida and Ohio in 2004. Where was the U.S. constitution in these
cases? Where was justice?"

All I ask is that you provide documented, authoritative references for these statements so that they can be looked at objectively without all of the rhetoric. Sharing knowledge, facts and wisdom is good for all. Making statements with substantiation is never good. That is the mistake Michael Moore makes in his movies.

Kaitlin

I would like to remind NowPublic members that inflammatory or abusive
speech in comments is considered Flaming and will be construed as a
violation our Flaming Policy and/or our Terms of Service. THIS INCLUDES BAITING, a definition of which can be found in the policy. Users found to violate these terms risk losing their site
privileges. Please refer to the above links for more information.

This comment thread will now be closed. 

Thank
you.

October 11, 2007 at 02:22 pm by angryindian, 1495 views, 23 comments

Crowd Power

jordan
First Flagged at 2:57 PM, Oct 11, 2007 by jordan
These members have powered this story:
 

is reporting from

closeSign in to NowPublic