Ron Paul Race Smear Erased?

by slenderdog | January 9, 2008 at 04:31 am
578 views | 0 Recommendations | 2 comments
Initial post 5.22.07

 
Internet information claiming that presidential candidate Ron Paul (R-TX) is a racist – and made derogatory comments about African Americans - has been making the rounds within the blogosphere. But sources close to the editorial group that published the newsletter (or newsletters) that supposedly carried the comments claim that Ron Paul never had anything to do with them, and wasn’t even aware of them.

Old news, but relevant after the recent article in The New Republic.  Ron Paul never said any of these things. 
An excerpt from an apparent interview with Texas Monthly as quoted on the blog Everything2.com clarifies the above information as follows:

 
"In spite of calls from Gary Bledsoe, the president of the Texas State Conference of the NAACP, and other civil rights leaders for an apology for such obvious racial typecasting, Paul stood his ground. He said only that his remarks about Barbara Jordan related to her stands on affirmative action and that his written comments about blacks were in the context of 'current events and statistical reports of the time.' He denied any racist intent. What made the statements in the publication even more puzzling was that, in four terms as a U. S. congressman and one presidential race, Paul had never uttered anything remotely like this.

 
"When I ask him why, he pauses for a moment, then says, 'I could never say this in the campaign, but those words weren't really written by me. It wasn't my language at all. Other people help me with my newsletter as I travel around. I think the one on Barbara Jordan was the saddest thing, because Barbara and I served together and actually she was a delightful lady.' ...

 
"His reasons for keeping this a secret are harder to understand: 'They were never my words, but I had some moral responsibility for them . . . I actually really wanted to try to explain that it doesn't come from me directly, but they campaign aides said that's too confusing. "It appeared in your letter and your name was on that letter and therefore you have to live with it." ' It is a measure of his stubbornness, determination, and ultimately his contrarian nature that, until this surprising volte-face in our interview, he had never shared this secret. It seems, in retrospect, that it would have been far, far easier to have told the truth at the time."

It is unfortunate that the sentiments and the rhetoric were so extreme--but this is evidence in itself that Dr Paul did not write these articles. 

recommend This comment thread is now closed
0
priruss

Ron Paul's people have protested vehemently that he knew nothing about the racist tripe being published in the newsletter.  My problem with that explanation is, if Ron Paul can't even keep his name from being sullied by racist and anti-Semitic garbage in a newsletter he lent his name to, how good a President could he possibly be?

0
neutral

That's ridiculous. I'm not a Ron Paul supporter, but you're obviously just looking for any reason to disqualify him as president. If that's your only problem with that explanation then you need to sit down and develop some more well-thought out personal opinions and critical thinking skills rather than reciting cliches. He's a politician and a person, and things like this happen to such people with busy lives. That is assuming his explanation is true.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from