Six "lost" nukes sent to the Middle East? The military can't seem to keep track

by raqqash | October 9, 2007 at 12:47 am
881 views | 7 Recommendations | 9 comments

Photos

Six "lost" nukes sent to the Middle East

Six "lost" nukes sent to the Middle East

see larger image

uploaded by raqqash

A retired lieutenant commander in the Navy Reserve who served with
the Navy's Supervisor of Salvage questioned in a little-noticed
editorial Sunday why six active nuclear armed cruise missiles were
being transferred to an active bomber base that "just happens to be the
staging area for Middle Eastern operations."

"The United States also does not transport nuclear weapons meant for
elimination attached to their launch vehicles under the wings of a
combat aircraft," Navy veteran Robert Stormer wrote in the Texas-based Star-Telegram.
"The procedure is to separate the warhead from the missile, encase the
warhead and transport it by military cargo aircraft to a repository --
not an operational bomber base that just happens to be the staging area
for Middle Eastern operations."

Six nuclear W80 nuclear-armed cruise missiles were flown to Minot
Air Force Base in North Dakota to Barksdale AFB in Louisiana where they
sat for ten hours undetected.

"Press reports initially cited the Air Force mistake of flying
nuclear weapons over the United States in violation of Air Force
standing orders and international treaties, while completely missing
the more important major issues, such as how six nuclear cruise
missiles got loose to begin with," writes Stormer.

"Let me be very clear here: We are not talking about paintball cartridges or pellet gun ammo. We are talking nuclear weapons."

Stormer doesn't buy reports that the missiles were simply lost. The title of his piece is "Nuke transportation story has explosive implications."

"There is a strict chain of custody for all such weapons," he said.
"Nuclear weapons handling is spelled out in great detail in Air Force
regulations, to the credit of that service. Every person who orders the
movement of these weapons, handles them, breaks seals or moves any
nuclear weapon must sign off for tracking purposes."

"All security forces assigned are authorized "to use deadly force to
protect the weapons from any threat. Nor does anyone quickly move a
1-ton cruise missile -- or forget about six of them, as reported by
some news outlets, especially cruise missiles loaded with high
explosives.

"This is about how six nuclear advanced cruise missiles got out of
their bunkers and onto a combat aircraft without notice of the wing
commander, squadron commander, munitions maintenance squadron (MMS),
the B-52H's crew chief and command pilot and onto another Air Force
base tarmac without notice of that air base's chain of command -- for
10 hours."

At the end of his editorial, he poses the following questions.

The questions that must be answered:

1 Why, and for what ostensible purpose, were these nuclear weapons taken to Barksdale?

2 How long was it before the error was discovered?

3 How many mistakes and errors were made, and how many needed to be made, for this to happen?

4 How many and which security protocols were overlooked?

5 How many and which safety procedures were bypassed or ignored?

6 How many other nuclear command and control non-observations of procedure have there been?

7 What is Congress going to do to better oversee U.S. nuclear command and control?

8 How does this incident relate to concern for reliability of
control over nuclear weapons and nuclear materials in Russia, Pakistan
and elsewhere?

9 Does the Bush administration, as some news reports suggest, have plans to attack Iran with nuclear weapons?

10 If this was an accident, have we degraded our military to a point
where we are now making critical mistakes with our nuclear arsenal? If
so, how do we correct this?

 Source: rawstory.com

recommend This comment thread is now closed
0
juan114

Where is the journalistic integrity here. Where are the editors? The headline claims a fact. This is happening all the time here at nowpublic.com. Where is the proof that the nukes are in the middle east? There are these little clicks of people flagging articles that are total fantasy and passing them off as fact, Isn't an Editors job to check the facts? But I have noticed when an article is politically correct all the Editors rush to flag the story as good stuff.Am I the only one who has noticed this?

0
juan114

Where is the journalistic integrity here. Where are the editors? The headline claims a fact. This is happening all the time here at nowpublic.com. Where is the proof that the nukes are in the middle east? There are these little clicks of people flagging articles that are total fantasy and passing them off as fact, Isn't an Editors job to check the facts? But I have noticed when an article is politically correct all the Editors rush to flag the story as good stuff. Am I the only one who has noticed this? You should have a new category "Fantasy"

0
PEP


0
raqqash

Juan,

I can tell you I found this piece of article:

Yesterday, the Washington Post attempted to explain away the fact
that America's nuclear command and control system broke down in an
unprecedented manner by reporting that it was the result of "security
failures at multiple levels." It is now apparent that the command and
control breakdown, reported as a BENT SPEAR incident to the Secretary
of Defense and White House, was not the result of a command and control
chain-of-command "failures" but the result of a revolt and push back by
various echelons within the Air Force and intelligence agencies against
a planned U.S. attack on Iran using nuclear and conventional
weapons.

The
Washington Post story on BENT SPEAR may have actually been an effort in
damage control by the Bush administration. WMR has been informed by a
knowledgeable source that one of the six nuclear-armed cruise missiles
was, and may still be, unaccounted for. In that case, the nuclear
reporting incident would have gone far beyond BENT SPEAR to a National
Command Authority alert known as EMPTY QUIVER, with the special
classification of PINNACLE.

It says the Washington Post talked about it. The source is here. And here you find the post on WP's blog.

Greetings 

0
juan114

Joe Schmo can put up that blog and William Arkin is a joke who compared the brave American Soldiers in Iraq of being mercenaries. None of them know where those nukes are. maybe you should just put a question mark at the end. because you have no idea where the nukes are.If the nowpublic editors turn a blind eye to this kind of scam news they might have to change it to crowd powered lunacy instead of media.

0
raqqash

There you go. Just guess where they are, considering only the USA president can make such trifles "disappear" ;-)

0
juan114

the USA has thousands of nukes Isreal has hundreds our aircraft carriers have nukes our subs have nukes.conspiracy is a fun game I guess but it is not news.sorry

0
juan114

Great the question mark works, Now even if I disagree I will want to read it. Why alienate half the people you have to reel them in first.

Tom van B
Tom van B
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 16:54 on October 9th, 2007

raqqash, This is an important story, with or without question mark. Please keep us posted on any further developments. Good stuff.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

Tom van B
First Flagged at 4:54 PM, Oct 9, 2007 by Tom van B
These members have powered this story:

Most Recommended Stories in World

 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from