TURKEY THREATENS REGIONAL STABILITY WITH WAR Update

by The Anglo American | October 17, 2007 at 11:44 am
1161 views | 14 Recommendations | 10 comments

Videos

Photos

The Parliament of Turkey

The Parliament of Turkey

see larger image

uploaded by The Anglo American

This is the second UPDATE to this broadsheet article. Thanks to moonwolf, here is a video interview with seperatist PKK leader Murat Karayilan IN Northern Iraq. My imbedding skills are not what they should be so please use the URL below.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qVOXExsyzFk 

This is an UPDATE to the article below. Here are some reactions by some senior players in the region, to Turkey’s parliamentary vote to send troops to Iraq. It should be noted that Turkey already has troops {up to 2000} stationed just inside the Iraq border, under a 23 year old agreement between the two countries.<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />
The head of Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK) military operations in northern Iraq has told Al Jazeera that the group will confront Turkish forces if they are attacked. Murat Karayilan gave his statement a day before Turkey's parliament was to meet to decide whether to sanction military operations against PKK bases inside Iraq.
"If Turkey is going to use violence against our movement, our leader and our people, then we will respond," {Al Jazeera)

Mahmud Othman, a senior Kurdish politican, said: "PKK members are present in the Kurdistan region but the regional government is preventing them from carrying out any attacks against Turkish targets.

"The Iraqi government is taking a position of giving in to Turkey. The military is not a solution, it will worsen the situation.

"I hope the Turkish government will review and reverse its decision [in favour of military action] and start dialogue with the central Iraqi government and the regional Kurdish government to find a political solution."


Source: Electronic Iraq


 


TURKEY VOTES TO SEND TROOPS TO NORHTERN IRAQ 
By Tim Butcher, Middle East Correspondent

Turkey's parliament today voted overwhelmingly in favour of empowering the armed forces to launch a cross-border assault against Kurdish insurgents based in northern Iraq.


  • Telegraph Talk: Oil prices surge as Turkey squares up to Iraq

    Despite an appeal for calm by the Baghdad government, the Ankara parliament voted 507-19 in support of the government's motion.

     

     

    The ruling party and major opposition groups backed the motion

    Turkish leaders have stressed that an offensive against the rebels of the Kurdistan Workers' Party, or PKK, will not immediately follow the authorisation.

    But the vote will be seen as an escalation of a growing threat to regional stability.

    With oil prices hovering close to the record level of $90 a barrel as markets factored in the chance of renewed fighting, the Nato secretary general, Jaap de Hoop Scheffer, telephoned the Turkish president to urge restraint.


    Turkish television carried live coverage of parliament as it debated the latest motion calling for the military attack on the gunmen of the PKK, a revolutionary group fighting for a homeland in Turkey.


    Parliamentarians from the ruling Justice and Development Party led by the prime minister Tayyip Erdogan gave speeches calling for decisive military action.


    Their sentiments were echoed by opposition MPs who fell in behind the government, angered by recent PKK attacks on Turkish troops in the south east of the country.

    advertisement


    In one attack a fortnight ago 15 soldiers were killed.


    "Turkey must eliminate this threat to its military, economic and diplomatic interests," opposition lawmaker Sukru Elekdag told parliament, pledging his party's support for the motion.


    While the rhetoric was powerful the reality is the Turkish military has staged more than a dozen cross-border incursions since 1990 against the PKK but the rugged mountain terrain of north Iraq means none of them have been decisive.


    The PKK has been able to avoid crippling losses and simply melt away into the hills. Unfortunately, civilians have not got off so lightly and there have been reports of hundreds of villages destroyed with largescale loss of life.


    Turkey has been here before, with the parliament twice passing a motion authorising force in 2003 but in the end Turkey held back from attacking, in part because it wanted to see how post-Saddam Hussein Iraq would deal with the PKK issue.


    Under the US-led occupation of Iraq, the north-eastern Kurdish section of the country has enjoyed substantial autonomy but while the official Iraqi Kurdish groups publicly condemn the PKK, Turkey is not happy they are actually dealing with their threat.


    This has threatened to sour relations between Turkey and post-Hussein Iraq although Jalal Talabani, the current Iraqi president who happens to be an ethnic Kurd, on Wednesday distanced his people from the PKK.


    "We consider the activities of the PKK against the interests of the Kurdish people and against the interests of Turkey," he said during an official visit to Paris.


    "We have asked the PKK to stop fighting and end military activity."


    Similar sentiments were expressed by Nouri al-Maliki, the Iraqi prime minister, during a telephone call to Mr Erdogan.


    Mr de Hoop Scheffer and Ban Ki-Moon, the United Nations secretary general, also joined the chorus calling for a diplomatic, not military, solution to the current crisis.


    Bashar al-Assad, the Syrian president, struck a different tone during an official visit to Ankara, the capital of Turkey, when he said Turkey had the right to act decisively against what he called the "terrorism" of the PKK.


    Ankara blames the PKK, considered a terrorist organisation by the United States and the European Union, for the deaths of more than 30,000 people since the group launched its armed struggle for an ethnic homeland in southeast Turkey in 1984.

  • Advertisement
    recommend This comment thread is now closed
    0
    ryan

    I think you need to modify your headline. Turkey has not declared war on Iraq but rather approved military action against the PKK which reside in Northern Iraq. The implication of your headline is that there will be a war between Turkey and Iraq, which is not the case even though there is concern that Turkish military action would further destabalize Iraq. There is potential, albeit unlikely and unintended, for a clash between Turkish and Iraqi forces; but war has not been declared. See here for further details.

    If this important change is not made I will have to flag this story.  

    0
    ryan

    A much more accurate headline.

    0
    The Anglo American

    The site is real slow, so please forgive the lethargic response. Yes, thanks for the edit, I was pondering it and you confirmed it! It is hyperbole. My struggle here is that it is a semantic issue as nobody declares war any more, yet we still have war. So it will be interesting to see what action will take place beyond the words - i.e what is the purpose behind the words? The Kurdish people I have spoken to are concerned with Iran's response, as Iran are no strangers to Northern Iraq. I guess we will soon find out.

    0
    ryan

    You are right when you say that countries don't declare war on each other as much as they did in previous era. But nevertheless it's an important distinction to make and more accurate to boot. The skirmishes between Turkey and the PKK in Iraq is nothing new what is new are the skirmishes with the new Iraqi government.

    BigT
    BigT
    flagged this story as Good Stuff

    at 14:39 on October 17th, 2007

    The Anglo American, good stuff.

    This is just what we need in the Middle East right now.

    0
    The Anglo American

    Thanks Big T. I've not posted it as I am not sure about the validity of the site, but one senior Turkish General is quoted as saying the time for talking is over. What must our troops be thinking?

    juan114
    juan114
    flagged this story as Good Stuff

    at 16:40 on October 17th, 2007

    The Anglo American, I like this story. It's good stuff. we can see how the democrats backed down from the resolution. It is clear that they can not be trusted with our security. They act like they are so smart when it comes to international affairs but in reality it is amature hour with the Dems.

    0
    The Anglo American

    Thanks juan114. You make a very interesting point. You would think, as everybody and his dog has an opinion about the Iraq war, that this election would launch the mother of all debates about the way forward, not just about the war, but what our future foreign policy should be about - the ideals behind it, balancing the pragmatism. But NO. Where are there any new ideas? At a time when you would think we would be flooded with inspirational ideas we have carefull nuanced gossamer thin speeches.     

    0
    Brian A Kennedy

    I added some YouTube videos. Great collaboration and debate, guys.

    0
    The Anglo American

    Excellent! Thanks Brian. Collaboration on a breaking story just makes it a whole lot stronger. I am going to have to learn this YouTube posting trick. Some of these I have not seen either.

    This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

    closeSign in to NowPublic

    is reporting from