Revamped UN Human Rights Council Condemns Israel, Acquits Cuba

by ryan | June 22, 2007 at 08:33 am
1669 views | 22 Recommendations | 3 comments

Photos

100_6943

100_6943

see larger image

uploaded by cdliyunlang

UPDATE 26.07.07: US support for the revamped UN Human Rights Council reaches all time low as a Congressional committee moves to cut off funding to the council. 

A United States congressional delegate to the United Nations is pushing for the United States to cut off funding for the UN Human Rights Council, saying the watchdog group's focus on Israel and failure to investigate other countries made it a disaster.

Senator Norm Coleman, a Republican from Minnesota, said Wednesday the council has essentially one issue on its agenda - Israel. "You've got countries like North Korea, Burma, Zimbabwe where you have state-sponsored brutality, and what we have is deafening silence," he said.

A U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee panel will take up the Human Rights Council's performance at a hearing Thursday. The committee last month approved legislation Coleman proposed to end U.S. funding of the council. The House of Representatives last month approved similar legislation by Congresswoman Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, a Republican from Florida.

Coleman, who along with Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer, represents Congress in the U.S. delegation to the UN, is a longtime critic of the UN. Boxer also supported the funding cut off when the Foreign Relations Committee approved the bill.

UPDATE: Israel's foreign minister, Tzipi Livni, lauded Canada's decision to protest the recent moves of the UNHRC Wednesday at Canada Day celebrations in the Tel Aviv suburb of Ramat Gan. 

 

"There is no connection between the United Nations Human Rights Council and human rights," said Livni, in an address to dignitaries and officials at Canada Day celebrations in Ramat Gan.

The foreign minister thanked Canada for being the only one of the council's 47 members to vote against its decision last week to place Israel on its permanent agenda.

Canada's Ambassador to Israel, Jon Allen, reiterated the Canadian government's position on the matter

 

"Canada took a strong stance and voted no, and notwithstanding the chairman went ahead and declared a consensus," Allen said.

"Israel should not be singled out when countries like Belarus and Sudan are ignored," the ambassador said, adding that Canada supported a two-state solution but believed in Israel's right to defend itself in a "tough neighborhood."

 

The relevance of the UN as an international watchdog is increasingly coming into question. It is becoming commonplace that some of the world's worst offenders of human rights control the UN bodies which monitor such violations.

The establishment of U.N. Human Rights Council, which replaces the U.N. Human Rights Commission, was intended to counter these occurrences, but the recent move to remove Cuba and Belarus from the list of countries under official permanent scrutiny while Israel remains under the official eye has created skepticism in the Western world of the effectiveness of the new body.

Members of the U.N.'s new human rights watchdog formally agreed Tuesday to continue their scrutiny of Israel while halting investigations into Cuba and Belarus — a move that immediately drew fire from Canada and the United States.

The decision was part of a package of reforms adopted by the members of the Human Rights Council to change how it conducts its work, including how and when to launch investigations into some of the world's worst rights offenders.

The council, which was formed last year to replace the discredited U.N. Human Rights Commission, passed the compromise package despite objections from Canada over plans to continue singling out Israel for scrutiny by the global body.

The new agreement also removes two mandates given to U.N.-appointed rights experts to examine the records of Cuba and Belarus, a move strongly criticized by non-governmental organizations, the United States and some European countries.

Nine other expert mandates, including on Haiti, Somalia, Congo, Sudan, Myanmar, North Korea and the Palestinian territories, will continue.

Israeli Ambassador Itzhak Levanon said the accord was disappointing because the council had failed to ensure that it would be "non-selective and impartial."

"It is not a bright day for the protection of human rights," Levanon said, adding that the agreement "perpetuates the immoral fixation on Israel."




The decision to keep Israel on the list was supported by all 47 members of the council except for Canada. And strangely, this move by Canada has not been widely reported in the Canadian press.

The United Nations Human Rights Council on Monday voted in favor of making Israel's actions a permanent item on the council's agenda.

Of the council's 47 member states, the sole opponent of the decision to make Israel a permanent agenda item was Canada.


 
The council's decision was attacked by both the U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon, the US, the EU, and the Israeli government.

United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon joined Western nations on Wednesday in criticizing the world body's own Human Rights Council for "picking on Israel" as part of an agreement on its working rules.

The European Union, Canada and the United States have already attacked the deal reached in Geneva on Monday under which Israel's actions would become a permanent item on the Human Rights Council's agenda.

A UN statement said: "The Secretary-General is disappointed at the council's decision to single out only one specific regional item given the range and scope of allegations of human rights violations throughout the world."

The statement did not mention Israel or the Palestinian Authority by name.

Alejandro Wolff, deputy U.S. permanent representative at the United Nations, accused the council of "a pathological obsession with Israel" and also denounced its action on Cuba and Belarus. "I think the record is starting to speak for itself," he told journalists.

The Geneva meeting aroused further controversy after Cuba and Belarus, both accused of abuses, were removed from a list of nine special mandates, which included North Korea, Cambodia and Sudan, carried forward from the defunct commission.



recommend This comment thread is now closed
Rob Walker
Rob Walker
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 10:04 on June 22nd, 2007

Ryan Nadel, this is a great story that affects not only Canadians, but people around the world. You've sourced it extremely well and it is easy to see why this is such a big concern.

babblingdweeb
babblingdweeb
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 10:19 on June 22nd, 2007

Ryan Nadel, great work on compiling the news articles here. Good stuff.

"The relevance of the UN as an international watchdog is increasingly
coming into question. It is becoming commonplace that some of the
world's worst offenders of human rights control the UN bodies which
monitor such violations."

This is a major issue with the UN right now (and I suppose for some time). There is a lot of political negotiating that goes on, that in some respects I can justify as that's the nature of conducting negotiations. However, some of these final decisions seem silly becase on their own i don't believe the UN would adopt them.

Renaming a commision is not going to solve its issues; however, reoginizing and putting propper policies in place would be a great start. 

0
angryindian

Long overdue in my estimation. And I am not alone.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

Most Recommended Stories in World

 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from