Rural homes 'costlier than urban'

by liamssoft | August 30, 2007 at 12:20 am
476 views | 2 Recommendations | 2 comments
Rural homes are less affordable than urban ones, with average prices more than seven times the typical local wage, a bank has reported.

House price inflation has pushed the average rural property value up to £246,104, which is £30,000 above that of a town house, Halifax said.

Carrick, Cornwall, was deemed the least affordable rural area.

The survey found the average house price in the district was £269,241, over 10 times the average local salary.

Chiltern in Buckinghamshire was identified as the most expensive rural location was an average price tag of £474,850.

Property ladder

Martin Ellis, chief economist at Halifax, said people in rural areas faced "particularly tough" housing market conditions.

"In general, higher average property prices, together with lower earnings, mean that housing is less affordable than in urban areas," he said.

Nowpublic related article  House Prices And People’s Incomes

recommend This comment thread is now closed
Brian A Kennedy
Brian A Kennedy
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 04:31 on August 30th, 2007

liamssoft, that's really interesting -- us city-dwellers always imagine that life must be so much cheaper in small towns, what with their less expensive housing and all, without stopping to think about how much less money we'd make if we lived in a small town.

0
liamssoft

many thanks

Brian

Plus; the price you pay for is the peace and quiet, the view and less
overcrowding. Minus; local wages are lower.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from