SCREW c.a.i.r.

c.a.i.r.

(coalition of anti-American islamic ruthlessness)

——————————————————————————————————-

Mosques as places of ’sanctuary’??? I can
not even begin to tell you, what future ramifications this may lead to.
Use your imagination.

CAIR-San Diego Rep Joins Launch of New Sanctuary Movement

CAIR SAN DIEGO REP JOINS LAUNCH OF NEW SANCTUARY MOVEMENT

(SAN DIEGO, CA 5/10/07) – On May 9, 2007, a
representative of the San Diego chapter of the Council on
American-Islamic Relations (CAIR-San Diego) participated in an
interfaith service to celebrate the launch of the New Sanctuary Movement.

The service took place at the Plymouth Congregational Church
Sanctuary in North Park and was organized by the San Diego Interfaith
Committee on Worker Justice (ICWJ).

The New Sanctuary Movement will be launched on the same day in San
Diego, Los Angeles, Seattle, Chicago and New York. Representatives from
more than 20 cities will also participate in a series of solidarity
events.

The New Sanctuary Movement is a national coalition of
interfaith religious leaders and participating congregations, called by
our faith to respond actively and publicly to the suffering of our
immigrant brothers and sisters residing in the United States. For more information about the national movement visit: NewSanctuaryMovement.org.

CAIR, America’s largest Islamic civil liberties group, has 32
offices and chapters nationwide and in Canada. Its mission is to
enhance the understanding of Islam, encourage dialogue, protect civil
liberties, empower American Muslims, and build coalitions that promote
justice and mutual understanding.

Let’s side step for a moment to learn what the “sanctuary movement” entails…

New “sanctuary” movement planned for illegal immigrants

Churches in a handful of U.S. cities, including Tucson, are preparing to launch a “sanctuary” movement to help illegal immigrants avoid deportation and unite faith-based groups in a push for immigration reform.

The “New Sanctuary Movement” is based on the sanctuary movement of
the 1980s, when churches harbored Central American refugees who were
fleeing wars in their home countries, said the Rev. Alexia Salvatierra,
executive director of Clergy and Laity United for Economic Justice, an
interfaith association spearheading the plans.

“At the time we were able to make major changes and awaken the moral
imagination of the community,” said Salvatierra. “Immigration today is
still a human rights issue.”

Salvatierra said they were in the process of identifying immigrant families to assist, but declined further details.

The full plan, which includes other major U.S. cities, will be
unveiled in several weeks, said Salvatierra, who is with the
Evangelical Lutheran Church in America.

The movement will enable congregations to provide “hospitality
and protection” to some immigrant families whose legal cases “clearly
reveal the contradictions and moral injustice of our current
immigration system,” [Evading US law by aiding and abbeting lawbreakers] according to the New Sanctuary Movement’s Web site.

Ruthiness at Stop The Invasion has the list of allies.

Stop the “New Sanctuary Movement” @ Stop The Invasion

What a bunch of horse shit. These people are aiding and
abetting illegal aliens. This is ILLEGAL I don’t care how much they
pray and fast and act like nice people. They are encouraging the human
tsunami to sweep over our nation and ruin it forever.

New ’sanctuary’ movement aimed at illegal immigrants

Kim Bobo, executive director of Chicago-based Interfaith Worker Justice, a labor group that is spearheading the effort, said a handful of undocumented immigrants across the country are currently part of the effort.

Leaders are uncertain how participating groups will
react should a deportation order be given and a moment of confrontation
with federal agents arise.

“I think people are going to have to cross that bridge when they come to it,” Coskey said. “We hope that the advocacy for the family prevents them from being deported.“

Such hesitancy stems from both the ambivalence over
illegal immigration today and the shame of seeing religious leaders
criminally charged during the ’80s sanctuary movement, said Joel
Fetzer, a Pepperdine University professor who has written about
sanctuary movements

“It may be that this is sort of a first step to get people involved,” Fetzer said. “It’s easier to get people involved if they don’t think they’re going to get prosecuted.

Sanctuary For Terrorists @ Right Truth

Sanctuary has taken on a new meaning today. In the past
sanctuary was something a church might offer an individual in dire
circumstances, but today we have not only churches offering sanctuary
to large numbers of illegals, we have entire cities and communities
that are protected sanctuaries. Sanctuary protected the 6 New Jersey
terrorists from law enforcement. Law enforcement doesn’t question folks
in sanctuary cities.

“The
implications of such lawlessness could be dire, U.S. and Paraguayan
officials said. Rep. Silvestre Reyes, D-Texas, chairman of the House
Intelligence Committee, said Hezbollah militiamen would raise
no suspicions because they have Latin American passports, speak Spanish
and look like Hispanic tourists.

Now back on track. c.a.i.r. has announced that they will be joining the “Sanctuary Movement”.
They also have announced that Mosques can apply from none other than
D.H.S, for grants to help strengthen security at Mosques. Now given the
documentation regarding c.a.i.r.’s…..

Let there be no doubt that the Council on American-Islamic Relations is a terrorist supporting front organization that is partially funded by terrorists, and that CAIR wishes nothing more than the implementation of Sharia law in America.”

We
know that CAIR will neither seriously admonish Muslims charged with
terrorist crimes nor introspectively examine the larger Islamic culture
that seems to so incite the jihadist.

Such organizations will not do so as long as they can far more
easily play on the self-doubt and guilt of the affluent and leisured
citizen, who is supposed to believe that the dangers of radical Islam,
both at the state and individual level, are mostly fictions inspired by
our own prejudices. The sermonizing here in the United States by an
Ayatollah Khatami, readily received by complaint listeners, and the
satellite-beamed sophistry of Tariq Ramadan prove that well enough.

…and certain U.S. based Mosques nefarious activities. Should they be receiving Federal grants to harden their security? The only possibly sane answer to that is..

HELL NO!

Action Alerts

Sunday, April 29, 2007

Action: Grants Available to Boost Mosque Security

DHS ANNOUNCES $24 MILLION AVAILABLE TO NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS TO STRENGTHEN SECURITY THROUGH UASI PROGRAM

http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/odp/newsreleases/FY07_UASI_Release.pdf

The following information was released by the Department of Homeland Security:

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced
today that nonprofit organizations in the 46 designated UASI areas are
eligible to apply for funds as part of the fiscal year (FY) 2007 Urban
Areas Security Initiative (UASI) Nonprofit Security Grant Program
(NSGP). This grant program will provide more than $24 million to eligible 501(c)(3) organizations who are deemed high-risk for a potential international terrorist attack.

Grants will be awarded to nonprofit organizations
through their eligible State Administrative Agency (SAA) according to
criteria that includes:

Prior identified and substantiated threats or attacks toward the nonprofit [It is highly possible they could pretend to have been a target, by planting suspect threatening material. I do not trust them no further than I could throw them.] or closely-related organization, [Could they be any more vaque?] either within or outside the U.S., by a terrorist organization; Symbolic value of a site as a highly recognized national or historical institution that renders it a possible terrorist target; [Since when are Mosques at risk as terrorist targets???]
Organization’s role in responding to or recovering from terrorist
attacks; and Organization’s credible threat or vulnerability, as well
as the potential consequences of an attack, as determined by a
previously conducted risk assessment.

The federal grant funds must be used for target-hardening
activities, which can be accomplished through training or the purchase
or installation of security equipment on real property owned or leased
by the nonprofit organization. Allowable equipment is limited to physical
security enhancements (e.g. alarm systems, bulletproof doors or
windows) or inspection and screening systems (e.g. walk-through
magnetometers and conveyor-belt x-ray systems used to screen personnel
and packages for hazardous materials or devices).

Additionally, nonprofit organization security personnel
may use NSGP funds to attend security-related training courses and
programs. Allowable training-related costs under NSGP are limited to
attendance fees for the training, and related expenses, such as
materials, supplies, or equipment. Allowable training topics are
limited to the protection of Critical Infrastructure/ Key Resources,
including physical and cyber security, target-hardening, and terrorism
awareness/employee preparedness. Not all eligible nonprofit
organizations and UASI communities are guaranteed to receive funding
under the FY 2007 NSGP. Allocation decisions will be made based on risk
and how well applicants address program requirements through their
investment justifications.

Nonprofit organizations must submit applications through
their SAA to be considered eligible for an award of up to $100,000.
Nonprofit organizations must agree to match 25 percent of federal grant
funds in cash or through equivalent, related training. In the case of
training projects, awardees must meet the matching requirement through
cash. For example, the costs of training security guards on new
screening equipment purchased under the grant would meet the match
requirement.

In FY 2005, DHS awarded $25 million to 18 high-risk urban areas to
support security improvements for nonprofit organizations in their
jurisdictions. Together with the FY 2007 grants, DHS direct support to
safeguard nonprofit organizations now totals over $49 million.

SAAs must submit applications for the FY 2007 UASI NSGP online at www.grants.gov by 11:59 p.m. EDT on June 22, 2007.

For more information on the FY 2007 UASI NSGP and other DHS grant programs, visit www.dhs.gov.

ACTION REQUESTED:

All eligible 501(c)(3) American mosques and
other Islamic institutions are urged to begin the application process
to receive training and to purchase equipment such as video cameras,
alarm systems and other security enhancements.

Program Guidance and Application Kit:

http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/odp/docs/FY07_UASI_Guidance.pdf

Fact Sheet:

http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/odp/docs/FY07_UASI_factsheet.pdf

CAIR seeking DHS Grant Money “to protect U.S. mosques, Islamic centers from terrorists”

By Douglas J. Hagmann, Director

CAIR eyes share of $24 million of DHS grant money

The Council on American Islamic Relations to use “hate
crime data” to have U.S. taxpayers fund security and “target hardening”
at U.S. Mosques and Islamic Centers, all of which are considered
“vulnerable to terrorist attack,” according to CAIR.

Using my experience as a veteran investigator, I
personally conducted an investigation into this incident, finding no
tangible evidence to support the claims asserted by the purported
victims.*

In addition to questionable or unsubstantiated
“threats,” closer inspection of the report also found that the
statistics are further inflated by publicly made “Islamophobic” remarks
and various forms of perceived discrimination that hardly rise to the
level of “attacks,” or by definition, criminal activity against
Muslims, mosques or Islamic Centers located inside the United States.
Unfortunately, it is common practice for the media – and even our own
government to accept the information contained in CAIR’S reports as
being factually accurate without independent verification.

Now, it appears that the recording of such purported incidents will be used to secure taxpayer money furnished by the United States Department of Homeland Security
under the Urban Areas Security Initiative (UASI) Nonprofit Security
Grant Program (NSGP). CAIR is working to insure that all 501(c)(3)
mosques and related Islamic properties in the U.S. are actively
pursuing funding from the U.S. government (in other words, from the
U.S. taxpayers) “for target hardening activities… that are deemed at high risk of a potential terrorist attack.”
In other words, CAIR is asserting that mosques and Islamic centers in
the U.S. are at risk of sustaining a terrorist attack and therefore,
qualify for grant money offered by the Department of Homeland Security
to prevent against such terrorist attacks.

Based on the above criteria, it would seem unlikely that
the developers of this program had mosques and Islamic Centers inside
the U.S. in mind when considering potential targets of international
terrorists. Nonetheless, CAIR is actively promoting mosques to apply
for such funding, using the statistics of anti-Muslim bias compiled by
CAIR to obtain the grant money.

If left unchecked, it is a good possibility that
U.S. taxpayers will soon be paying for security enhancements at mosques
and Islamic centers.

America had better open up her collective eyes, ears, and mouths to prevent this country from becoming so lost it will never find it’s way back!