Shield Law For Bloggers, New Bill Enters Congress

by babblingdweeb | May 4, 2007 at 12:28 pm
580 views | 10 Recommendations | 2 comments

Photos

day 073.365

day 073.365

see larger image

uploaded by babblingdweeb

A log awaited bill for many of us in the independent news arena, and those of us with blogs: the Shield Law for bloggers!

[Download the updated Free Flow of Information Act (PDF)]

What is the Shield Law?

Shield laws are laws which protect journalists from being forced to disclose confidential information in legal proceedings. These laws protect the rights of a journalist from revealing confidential sources, notes, or other unpublished information and may be applied in both criminal and civil hearings.[1] There are currently no federal statutes pertaining to shield laws, and as such these laws are left up to the states to determine.

Will this bill open up anyone (in the U.S.) to be covered? Not exactly...
The bill defines journalism as "gathering, preparing, collecting, photographing, recording, writing, editing, reporting or publishing of news or information that concerns local, national or international events or other matters of public interest for dissemination to the public."


The bill's authors are "not attempting to extend this privilege to everyone in our society," Boucher told CNET News.com. The bill's language, however, does not actually require that a covered person do journalism as an occupation or even on a regular basis. When asked how precise distinctions would be made, Boucher said it will ultimately be up to the courts to interpret and refine the bill's definition.


There have been many online and offline debates as to what rights bloggers have. Many people feel that the field of journalism should be just left to the professional journalists; however, that just doesn't seem practical anymore. In a global network of information, the public has the power to research material almost equally as well as professionals -and in some instances as seen here on NowPublic, it is only the public or "citizen journalist" that has the story.

Those doing a civil service, or just airing their opinion should have the right to do so and they should have the right to protect their sources just as the general media does. There is no need to shoot the messenger -or their source.

As with most things, with great power comes great responsibility. Ethics play a major role in blogging and citizen journalism -those who don't check sources or post unethically should not be covered. It sounds as if the bill is written to give freedom to those that diserve it, and allows the courts to make accurate judgments on those otherwise unethical writers.

One last thought...
Although her organization would like to see as many people "under the umbrella of journalism" as possible, she said, "if everybody's a journalist, nobody's a journalist."

recommend This comment thread is now closed
Actual News Geezer
Actual News Geezer
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 12:36 on May 4th, 2007

babblingdweeb, many thanks - nice work putting together these elements - we need to have a much more thorough-going discussion about all of this as we get closer to the 2008 US elections.

0
angryindian

Yeah man, we need this as this ism' progresses.  Good work.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from