NP Rank:
Disallowed soccer goal reignites technology debate
At the weekend, Crystal Palace scored a goal in open play. Crystal clear, you might say. The ball bobbled in front of the striker and a defender - the striker reached it first and stuck it beyond the marooned keeper into the corner of the net. So far, so routine. But what happened next has set the soccer world aflame with impassioned debate.
The ball struck part of the goal and rebounded out. Not the post or the crossbar, but the crosspiece at the back of the net that holds it to the ground - fully 6 feet beyond the goal line. Somehow, incredibly, neither the referee or linesmen saw that the ball had crossed the line and waved play on - to the bewilderment of both teams.
After the game, the 'goal that never was' rapidly became a cause celebre for those who wish to introduce technology into the game to prevent spurious decisions like this affecting the outcome of matches. On the one hand are the allies of change, yet a surprising amount of opinion out there is resisting calls for modernisation. The argument runs that refereeing mistakes like this are part of the very lifeblood of the game and that expunging them will only serve to make the game duller and more tediously professional than it already is.
The FA was quick to act - suspending the referee within a matter of days and the debate about whether this should be the tipping point for introducing ancillary technology to help referees make better decision is filling the back pages of the papers.
I for one aren't sure that this isn't another example of the creeping kill-joyism that is turning football from a flawed but viscerally exciting sport into a kind of sporting accountancy. Not everything in life should be corralled into a pen of perfectionism. Football in particular thrives on a bedrock of injustices. Individual tackles are still stewed over in pubs up and down the land. Questionable refereeing is one of the things that brings all football fans together. Whichever side you support, "who's the w****er in the black" is one of the few questions that is eternal and immutable throughout the game.
By making the game more perfect, we are also robbing it of it's personality.



Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (3)
at 00:39 on August 17th, 2009
I'm with the naysayers. I'm sure if I was a Palace fan I'd be spitting blood - but it's this kind of thing that makes football so compelling. As a Leeds fan I'm still raging over about a million injustices committed against down the years but if you took that away from me all I'd have is "we were beaten fair and square". Which might be healthier and more balanced, but boring as hell.
at 04:20 on August 17th, 2009
First you need to download the Highlight tool
http://my.nowpublic.com/newsroom/tools/highlight/highlight
Write your story
http://my.nowpublic.com/newsroom/tools/write_story
Tips
http://my.nowpublic.com/newsroom/guidelines/j-tips
Terms of use and fine print
http://my.nowpublic.com/help/terms_and_conditions
http://my.nowpublic.com/newsroom/guidelines/fine_print
What is news and news value
http://my.nowpublic.com/newsroom/guidelines/news_values
Code of Conduct
http://my.nowpublic.com/newsroom/guidelines/code_of_conduct
Should you have any question you may ask any Editor on Staff such as
Amy Judd
http://my.nowpublic.com/amyjudd
Jarrett Martineau
http://my.nowpublic.com/jarrett_martineau
Tina Kells
http://my.nowpublic.com/tina-kells
or any other Staff Editor or Guest Editor
Should you want to file a complained please do so in the Forum or in PM to any Staff Editor.
Here http://my.nowpublic.com/forum
Or here http://my.nowpublic.com/newsroom/community/nowpublic_editorial_team
Thank you for the post.
Best, UP.
at 06:20 on August 26th, 2009
Still can't get the tool to work. On FireFox 3.0.13