London 2012, Vancouver 2010 share similar financial woes

by mike_yvr | November 19, 2008 at 07:17 am
911 views | 35 Recommendations | 5 comments

Photos

London 2012 fading Legacy

London 2012 fading Legacy

see larger image

uploaded by dowdinsk

Videos

Loading videos...

Concerns over the increasing cost of hosting the 2010 games in Vancouver include unknown security costs, a grossly overbudget convention/media centre and a $100 million bailout for the developer of athletes' housing.

Those concerns are being shared across-the-pond in London where 2010 summer games organizers are watching as plans for a privately financed media centre and atheletes village are at risk from the current financial crisis. That, combined with -- you guessed it -- rising security costs, could wipe out the billion pound contingency fund  and blow the London Olympics budget of 9.3 billion pounds.

Misery loves company...

Next week the Olympic circus pitches camp in the capital for a four-day conference attended by International Olympic Committee president Jacques Rogge and 400 other delegates gathered to distil the lessons of the Beijing Games for future host cities. For London the most significant event comes last, a one-day review by senior IOC executives of the city's progress. It promises to be a chastening affair, with cold economic realities dominating the agenda.

Politically and practically, the ground has shifted since the IOC inspectors were last in town in June, a visit that concluded with Denis Oswald, chairman of the co-ordination commission, cheerily awarding the capital "9.75 out of 10".

In the interim, London has been hit hard by the banking crisis. The deep-freeze afflicting the financial markets has been disastrous for London's plans for a privately financed Olympic village and media centre. It now seems likely that most of the £1 billion emergency contingency will be required to bail out the projects. The contingency had been ear-marked to cover increases in security costs and should it be wiped out to cover construction, Tessa Jowell's promise that the £9.3 billion budget will not be exceeded could be in danger.

Update: Corporate sponsors facing tough times are bailing on the International Olympic Committee's Olympic Sponsorship Program.

Advertisement
recommend This comment thread is now closed
0
Uwe Paschen

Most Olympics in the past two decades have been financial disasters in a way and yet they broth much prestige and secondary business to those cities.

0
dowdinsk

One of London's Olympic boroughs, Hackney has just removed from its website previously promised Legacy commitments. I'm told the London Evening Standard will be covering this breaking story in tomorrow's edition.

0
Amy Judd

I thought London was doing a better job of budgeting their Olympics.

0
dowdinsk

@ amyjudd: I thought London was doing a better job of budgeting their Olympics.

Did you really? Grabbing a few examples from the GamesMonitor newsgroup, how about:

Glascow 2014 legacy diverted to London 2012

Fears over legacy in the 'forgotten Olympic borough'

Shifting the goalposts some more?

Athletes' Village bailout

0
frankieteardrop

I voted against hosting the Vancouver olympics in the sham referendum held here years back. If they had recorded votes maybe we could have been exempted from the colossal debt that will inevitably result.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

NowPublic on Facebook

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

Uwe Paschen
First Flagged at 7:39 AM, Nov 19, 2008 by Uwe Paschen
These members have powered this story:

Most Recommended Stories in Sports

Recommendations (35)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from