Strange

Microchipping Program Begins in 36 Months Under New Health Bill

by PAIR A NORMAL GUYS INC | April 20, 2010 at 07:48 pm

2632 views | 10 Recommendations | 6 comments

Be prepared to be marked permanently, no I am not speaking of getting a tattoo or a permanent scar. I m speaking of a R.F.I.D. (radio frequency identification chip) implanted under your skin about the size of a grain of rice. In this newsreel presented by abc Channel 7 Dr Jay Adelsberg speaks of this device with a snide glimmer of honesty and integrity in my opinion. The R.F.I.D. chip is primarily intended to varify who and who does not have medical coverage you will see the specific link and section below. The underlying issue is once tagged you are practically marked and processed with the ability to track your every movement, activity and possibly state of mind in the future. The proposed R.F.I.D. plan is slated to begin in 36 months in a wide scale implantation program associated with the new Universal Health Care Plan in the United States. It is a section in the new health care documents I have listed the website pdf file and the specific section as well below.
To view the described section of this document scroll down to Subtitle C-11Sec. 2521 at the top of page 35 on this website and pdf file waysandmeans.house.gov/media/pdf/111/sbys3200.pdf This is a very disturbing piece of information within this document as it stands it will mean that the United States will be the first country in the world to implement an R.F.I.D. chip implant program on it's own people that will be mandatory.

2 See all footage | View Slideshow

Share: email story | add to any | | facebook | stumbleupon

recommend This comment thread is now closed

jdvanlaningham (not verified)

at 06:22 on April 21st, 2010

I clicked the link; there's absolutely no mention of implanting RDIF chips in anyone. As far as I can tell, the author is referring to the national registry of implanted medical devices...guys, they're talking about PACEMAKERS, etc. There is no plan to implant RDIF chips in people, and the source you claim supports this charge doesn't say what you claim it says.

jdvanlaningham (not verified)

at 06:27 on April 21st, 2010

I clicked the link; there's absolutely no mention of implanting RFID chips in anyone. As far as I can tell, the author is referring to the national registry of implanted medical devices...guys, they're talking about PACEMAKERS, etc. There is no plan to implant RFID chips in people, and the source you claim supports this charge doesn't say what you claim it says.

Sheikha (not verified)

at 12:17 on April 21st, 2010

Where does it say RFID? I completely doubt that anyone would ever go for this. Please back up your claim with verifiable and credible information.

sally fugg (not verified)

at 16:52 on April 21st, 2010

just look up the verichip, you won't want one of these in you,i won't be getting one and neither will my kids.

Karen Hatter

at 17:38 on April 21st, 2010

Also at Nowpublic:

HealthCare Falsehoods = Implants, Private Army, Etc.

Will the law require all patients to be implanted with microchips?

No. Nothing like this appears in the new law, or in any of the bills that Congress considered. This claim stems from a wild misinterpretation of a provision in the original House leadership’s bill (H.R. 3200) that did not require implantation of anything, and that was, in any case, not part of the final legislation. The part of the original House leadership’s bill that’s usually referenced to support this rather paranoid claim actually would have set up a registry for class III medical devices and class II devices that are "implantable, life-supporting, or life-sustaining." The Federal Drug Administration’s classifications determine how much oversight and regulation the device has — class III devices (such as, for example, replacement heart valves or artificial hips) need pre-market FDA approval; class I devices (like x-ray film or tongue depressors) need only general quality controls. Class II devices, which need to meet performance standards but don’t need pre-market approval, cover a wide range — blood pressure cuffs are class II, but so are cerebral shunts. That’s why the bill specified implantable, life-supporting and life-sustaining devices.

But the bill did not mandate implantable devices of any kind, least of all microchips. Rather, it said that implantable devices will be registered so that physicians can access data about safety and effectiveness in a way that "protects patient privacy and proprietary information." And again, it didn’t become law.

MaryB (not verified)

at 19:09 on May 17th, 2010

Before you start going off about this not being an implantable device you need to do some research. This is some sneaky wording, and if you know your history of the FDA you would already know that a Class II is a device that IS a device that is something that was approved back in 2004 by the FDA and has been sitting in the wings waiting for just such a time as this. You can read that documentation at: www.fda.gov/downloads/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/ucm072191.pdf There you will see that this Class II device is: "Approved by the FDA a class II implantable device is an “implantable radio frequency transponder system for patient identification and health information.” The purpose of a class II device is to collect data in medical patients such as “claims data, patient survey data, standardized analytic files that allow for the pooling and analysis of data from disparate data environments, electronic health records, and any other data deemed appropriate by the Secretary.” So with this in mind, how much further will they then take this?