New See-Through Screening Device at Airport Shows Genitals

by Jon Azpiri | October 20, 2008 at 03:31 pm
1533 views | 0 Recommendations | 3 comments

Travelers passing through the airport in Melbourne, Australia may be scanned by a new security scanners that can see through clothing. The scanner, which is being described as a "virtual strip search", uses a low energy X-ray to reveal any objects under a person's clothing. The new scanners are so detailed that security officials will be able to make out body features, including breasts and genitals.

"It does see through clothing, but it's not a photographic image, it's a low-energy X-ray that reflects off the skin," said Cheryl Johnson, general manager of the Office of Transport Security.

"It will show the private parts of people, but what we've decided is that we're not going to blur those out, because it severely limits the detection capabilities. It is possible to see genitals and breasts while they're going through the machine, though."

However, Ms Johnson said there were a number of measures in place to tackle concerns about privacy.

"The faces are automatically blurred and ... it's only a chalk-style outline, it's not as invasive as some of the other equipment that we've got," she said.

"The security officer that's looking at it is located away from the screening lane, so there's no comparison of the person walking through and the image. The images are not saved, you literally walk through, the screener hits a button to say clear and the image goes."

Security officials in Melbourne say that testing with the new scanner is completely voluntary during the six-week trial period. If the trial is a success, the new technology might replace the current screening machines or be used for secondary tests to detect weapons and other banned objects.

Not surprisingly, the new scanners have raised a few eyebrows among civil liberties experts.

Adelaide University civil liberties expert Allan Perry said the technology could breach people's privacy if used as a general measure for all passengers rather than those identified as a security risk.

"If this is done on a widespread basis without selectivity it certainly goes beyond an appropriate balance of personal privacy and security," he said. "Simply because something is being done for the purpose of security does not justify intrusive and invasive searches of people. If you said that everyone who wanted to board an aircraft would be physically strip-searched people would object. This is tantamount to the same thing."

recommend This comment thread is now closed
0
jessica.lam

low x-ray eh? I'm not a fan of flying radicals.

0
yuls.source

Low X-ray radiation is probably ok unless you are a frequent flier and get exposed on a continuous basis.

0
Jon Azpiri

Apparently, intrusive scanners aren't the only thing that frequent flyers have to worry about.

As a screener at Newark Liberty International Airport, Pythias Brown was supposed to keep deadly objects off airplanes. But for the past year, authorities allege, Brown has been swiping electronic equipment from luggage of the passengers he was supposed to protect.

A laptop here, a cell phone there. Within months, he had snatched more than 100 items, authorities say.

But this summer, Brown got too ambitious for his own good, allegedly stealing a $47,900 camera from an HBO crew and a camcorder from a CNN employee, authorities said.


This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Most Recommended Stories in Strange

 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from