NP Rank:
Pet portraits: $1,400 well-spent?
Hmmm...aside from the comedic effect of having a portrait of Fluffy hanging above your mantlepiece, I'm not so sure a glamourous pet headshot is $1,400 well-spent.
Many pet-lovers would disagree though, as the final quote from dog-portrait painter Julie Glick attests: "They're poignant, beautiful creatures. Dogs are a metaphor for the plight of mankind, if that's not too grand a statement."
Um, it's kind of grand, yeah.
But surely the queen of the castle is Amanda Jones, a Massachusetts-based photographer who has been called both the Annie Leibovitz and the Richard Avedon of pet photographers. From her home in North Adams, she flies across the United States, hitting about 20 cities a year to do pet portraits.
After a 2005 profile of Ms. Jones appeared in the New York Times, says the photographer, "we got a few celebrity clients," including Mary Tyler Moore and Danielle Steel, and Ms. Jones's schedule filled up "for two years straight."
She now charges $1,400 for a session, which lasts an hour and a half.
"It's just a huge industry," says Julie Glick, a Toronto-based painter who kicked off her career as a dog-portrait painter with a show of neighbourhood dogs in her local gallery. She has done about 15 paintings of dogs, starting at $400. "It's really indicative of how our relationship with pets has changed."
"Even though we look at pet portraiture as sometimes kind of kitsch, or, 'It's too cute, you've got a picture of Foo Foo up there,' it can be so much more substantial than that. They're poignant, beautiful creatures," Ms. Glick says. "Dogs are a metaphor for the plight of mankind, if that's not too grand a statement."
Crowd Power
-
aletteke
Vancouver (South Renfrew- Collingwood), British Columbia, Canada -
ex.libris
Downey, California, United States -
Rob Peters
Vancouver, Canada -
missgingersnap
Canada -
Artist Victoria Watson
Newport News, Virginia, United States -
Doxiementary
Castro Valley, California, United States -
relicartistry
Cumming, Georgia, United States -
Pashka
Carlsbad, California, United States -
deqalb
Malaysia -
littlekay7
Waukesha, Wisconsin, United States -
kimquinn
Atlanta, Georgia, United States -
John and Stacy
Oakland, California, United States -
MogI
Netherlands -
LUKA70
Rome, Italy -
ShellVergel
Brooklyn, New York, United States -
susan ogden
Long Valley, New Jersey, United States -
Debbie.L
Taiwan -
Mindy Fisher
Chicago, Illinois, United States -
Todd D.
Enumclaw, Washington, United States -
jonkk
Singapore -
Patricianunez
rio de janeiro, Brazil















Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (2)
at 18:28 on March 11th, 2008
I take my own portraits of Raul, my beloved Retriever-Daschund. I have friends who have approached me to do portraits of their dogs as well, and some are even paying me to do it. I believe people are prepared to spend on the ones they love.
How much they spend on their pets is definitely the prerogative of the owners. If they can afford it, $1,400 isn't an issue. However, being the pragmatist that I am, I personally wouldn't spend that much on making portraits of my dog. I'd probably spend a quarter of that at most and use the rest to finance his visits to the vet, dog food, etc.. Even give some to the RSCPA!
jonkk has contributed a photo to this story.
at 18:35 on March 17th, 2008
Rob Peters, I like this story. It's good stuff.