Pet portraits: $1,400 well-spent?

by Rob Peters | March 11, 2008 at 11:19 am
943 views | 5 Recommendations | 2 comments

Videos

Time Laspe Painting of Haflinger

see larger video

sourced by Rob Peters

Time Laspe Painting of Haflinger
A feature in today's Globe and Mail looks at the rising popularity of the "pet portraiture industry." It's become so lucrative that photographers can charge up to $1,400 a sitting.

Hmmm...aside from the comedic effect of having a portrait of Fluffy hanging above your mantlepiece, I'm not so sure a glamourous pet headshot is $1,400 well-spent. 

Many pet-lovers would disagree though, as the final quote from dog-portrait painter Julie Glick attests: "They're poignant, beautiful creatures. Dogs are a metaphor for the plight of mankind, if that's not too grand a statement." 

Um, it's kind of grand, yeah.

But surely the queen of the castle is Amanda Jones, a Massachusetts-based photographer who has been called both the Annie Leibovitz and the Richard Avedon of pet photographers. From her home in North Adams, she flies across the United States, hitting about 20 cities a year to do pet portraits.

After a 2005 profile of Ms. Jones appeared in the New York Times, says the photographer, "we got a few celebrity clients," including Mary Tyler Moore and Danielle Steel, and Ms. Jones's schedule filled up "for two years straight."

She now charges $1,400 for a session, which lasts an hour and a half.

"It's just a huge industry," says Julie Glick, a Toronto-based painter who kicked off her career as a dog-portrait painter with a show of neighbourhood dogs in her local gallery. She has done about 15 paintings of dogs, starting at $400. "It's really indicative of how our relationship with pets has changed."
"Even though we look at pet portraiture as sometimes kind of kitsch, or, 'It's too cute, you've got a picture of Foo Foo up there,' it can be so much more substantial than that. They're poignant, beautiful creatures," Ms. Glick says. "Dogs are a metaphor for the plight of mankind, if that's not too grand a statement."
recommend This comment thread is now closed
0
jonkk

I take my own portraits of Raul, my beloved Retriever-Daschund. I have friends who have approached me to do portraits of their dogs as well, and some are even paying me to do it. I believe people are prepared to spend on the ones they love.

How much they spend on their pets is definitely the prerogative of the owners. If they can afford it, $1,400 isn't an issue. However, being the pragmatist that I am, I personally wouldn't spend that much on making portraits of my dog. I'd probably spend a quarter of that at most and use the rest to finance his visits to the vet, dog food, etc.. Even give some to the RSCPA!


jonkk has contributed a photo to this story.

Tomitheos
Tomitheos
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 18:35 on March 17th, 2008

Rob Peters, I like this story. It's good stuff.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

Tomitheos
First Flagged at 6:35 PM, Mar 17, 2008 by Tomitheos
These members have powered this story:

Most Recommended Stories in Strange

 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from