the Round Table revisited

After speaking with mom tonight about my missions on this planet, after rehashing some ideas with her, after mentally examining my own recent articles, i've realized one of my missions concerns the creation of a Round Table which i've written about before. As an aside, i just received a letter from an Examiner editor about my last article on TheAmazingAtheist. They rejected the article for various reasons including: “The piece is extremely difficult to follow, full of spelling, capitalization, grammar and punctuation errors including the headline.” [he] After three years of building up/on this style, they think i'm gonna change for them? Wake up dudes.. Not gonna happen.. ^^ So anyways, after talking with mom about this Round Table idea and related topics, i realized it's one of my 'main missions'. But i need to talk about details again.. They way i envision this round table is:

1. representatives of all major religions/ideologies are present individually (not proportionately)

2. each religion/ideology chooses their representative and fully accepts RT decisions

3. decisions are arrived at by genuine (not railroaded) consensus

4. they need to decide on the simplest set of basic human rights

5. on how to constrain population growth for various sectors

6. on how to share/allocate resources

7. on things acceptable to generations to come

For example, if i can get atheists to agree “we're basically leasing Earth” (not owning it), this is one HUGE step forward in creating the RT. To get atheists to agree on anything would be progress but this thing in particular shows a willingness not in concessions but acknowledging shared values. The fact Pat and Terry ignore my attempts to engage them indicates a deep mistrust from atheists toward any other groups. Honestly, from my heart, i'm not trying to capitalize on their popularity, use them in any way, engage them for material prospects, or any other selfish reason – other than my desire to create the RT. There's some momentum in my 'soul'/spirit/heart that i cannot deny. Bob from the Mennonite fellowship at MSU is still in my heart as i type these words. His objections to selfish co-ops were noted in my soul; i can never forget his wise sentiments – and so my words of caution were expressed in those related articles.. Consensus in action was another thing etched into my being garnered from the Mennonites. “God as lover” yet another. (i have a 'photographic' memory for relevant conversations.) ^^ 'Somehow' (as if anything's by accident [he]) the Divine in me recognizes people to learn from and i naturally/automatically associate with them.. Bob, John, Leslie, Jewel,.. were all my teachers and friends.. We need to cherish and recognize those that had significant impact. :) “Hey, i'm just reminding you, okay?” So we need to authoritatively establish this thing called the Round Table, we need to select authoritative representatives of each religion/ideology existing on the planet, we need to decide the purposes for this thing, and hopefully decide on things above.. ^^ i cannot force the creation of such a thing.. As a messenger of the Prime Goddess, i can only suggest it.. i don't have any 'authority' per se (obviously).. Not in the human realm and certainly not in the spiritual realm.. But i can glimpse feelings and indications.. She's not especially happy with this disarray and cacophony of agendas.. A 'little' more cooperation, mutual respect, acceptance, and acknowledgment is in order.. Some physical indications tell me 'my ticket is near completion'.. It's just a guess but i may be coming close to .. you know – 'buying the farm' [he] ;) ..i love all of you my teachers :) ..i believe i have a memory of informing Bob: “The Divine in me recognizes the Divine in you as my co-Teacher.” What more perfect sentiment or closing remark ^^ other than: I LOVE You.

sam iam, 2012/JAN/23