Russian Dead Alien Video: A Hoax

While I agree with you that it's more than likely a hoax, I was disheartened by your article after being hooked in by your secondary title, "Dead Alien Video from Siberia is Fake". I was expecting substantial claims, well-founded evidence, or even a citation from the Russian filmmakers that it was a hoax. Don't get me wrong, I wasn't expecting a science article nor did I enter with the mind of countering your position as I do believe it is a hoax -- but the strength and tone of your claim misled me to nothing more than self-discovered, self-justified obvservations and rhetoric. Why I'm so bothered is because it's a pet peeve of mine when people automatically subscribe with zeal to claims only because it is outright seemingly so; meaning, alien abduction/sightings are veiled heavily in skepticism due to its history of fraudulence and lack of hard evidence so it is outright, seemingly so that "Man, this video is a hoax!" And it goes both ways, "Yo, this alien is for real!" And let me clarify, it's not the claim that bothers me, it's if either party brings forth evidence that is nothing more than self-realized rhetoric and black-white attitude lacking substantiated reports, further primary source findings, etc. Because even with all the best argument and observation, the questionable landscape pans before the alien is shown, the observation it looked like archetypical Hollywood aliens, there's still that minute, shred of a chance it is real. Am I absurd? No, that's man of reason and science speaking. No one debunks and dismisses, no one believes and subscribes to a claim with instaneous whim on a "It has to be..." feeling. That feeling is only the kernel to research and empirical engagement. Again, don't me wrong, as a man of reason and science, I also won't bet a single dime on that remote chance it is an alien; though, I won't subscribe to the party that says for 100% gurantee it's a hoax. To me, even 99.9999999 is not a 100. TL:DR? Change the title to, "Dead Alien Video, probably another fake."

Russian filmmakers that it was a hoax. Don't get me wrong, I wasn't expecting a science article nor did I enter with the mind of countering your position as I do believe it is a hoax -- but the strength and tone of your claim misled me to nothing more than self-discovered, self-justified obvservations and rhetoric. Why I'm so bothered is because it's a pet peeve of mine when people automatically subscribe with zeal to claims only because it is outright seemingly so; meaning, alien abduction/sightings are veiled heavily in skepticism due to its history of fraudulence and lack of hard evidence so it is outright, seemingly so that "Man, this video is a hoax!" And it goes both ways, "Yo, this alien is for real!" And let me clarify, it's not the claim that bothers me, it's if either party brings forth evidence that is nothing more than self-realized rhetoric and black-white attitude lacking substantiated reports, further primary source findings, etc. Because even with all the best argument and observation, the questionable landscape pans before the alien is shown, the observation it looked like archetypical Hollywood aliens, there's still that minute, shred of a chance it is real. Am I absurd? No, that's man of reason and science speaking. No one debunks and dismisses, no one believes and subscribes to a claim with instaneous whim on a "It has to be..." feeling. That feeling is only the kernel to research and empirical engagement. Again, don't me wrong, as a man of reason and science, I also won't bet a single dime on that remote chance it is an alien; though, I won't subscribe to the party that says for 100% gurantee it's a hoax. To me, even 99.9999999 is not a 100. TL:DR? Change the title to, "Dead Alien Video, probably another fake" because there's no other outside evidence to discredit the video, albeit not too heavy burden of proof. Even a tiny lead toward it being a hoax would help.

Ignore double post, thank you and sorry.