Trying to Save Queensland's Big Pineapple

by Jordan Yerman | October 16, 2009 at 08:03 am
174 views | 19 Recommendations | 2 comments

Photos

Maximus Awesomus Pineappulus

Maximus Awesomus Pineappulus

see larger image

uploaded by El Fotopakismo

The Big Pineapple is an iconic Sunshine Coast tourist attraction, but its fate hangs in the balance between an ambitious real estate developer and those who would preserve a key element of Australian roadside culture.

Originally owned by Rupert Murdoch, the Big Pineapple was purchased by Graham Hayes, and has been mismanaged ever since. The Big Pineapple, I'm told by one former local, has been in trouble for a long time.

The Big Pineapple has heritage listing, so it probably can't be pulled down, but public access may be limited if the other aspects of the Big Pineapple complex- which includes hops, parking, and a nut factory- is destroyed or altered.

"It's one of the oldest and most unique tourist attractions in Queensland," said manager John Edwards.

"It's a great business which should continue to operate into the future."

However, that optimism isn't shared by developers who believe the farming land will be rezoned for housing.

The Big Pineapple's heritage listing would not stop it becoming part of a private housing estate, with homes built on existing pineapple and macadamia plantations.


Australia also boasts a giant lobster, a giant prawn, a giant teakettle, a giant pickle barrel, and a giant koala with scary red eyes, plus many more.

recommend Add a comment
0
Barbara McPherson

What part of food crisis, don't the people in charge of rezoning understand? 

0
Maybe the owner is a crook?

The Executive Chairman of Sunshine Coast tourist icon ‘The Big Pineapple’, Mr Graham Edward Hayes, pleaded guilty in the Downing Centre Local Court to three counts of managing a corporation while disqualified, following charges brought by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission.Mr Hayes was charged with one count of managing a corporation while disqualified, contrary to section 206A(1) of the Corporations Act 2001, and two counts of managing a corporation while disqualified, contrary to section 600(5) of the Corporations Law. On 30 January 1998, Graham Edward Hayes was prohibited by ASIC from acting in the management of a corporation for five years under section 600 of the Corporations Law. The prohibition resulted from Mr Hayes’ directorship of three failed companies, which were unable to repay creditors more than 50 cents in the dollar.ASIC alleged that despite being disqualified Mr Hayes continued to engage in various acts of management in the companies Hay-Ric Pty Limited, Sunfarm Pty Limited and Gogard Pty Limited. The acts included operating company bank accounts, passing company cheques, negotiating with suppliers and customers on behalf of a company and also entering into a joint venture on behalf of a company to develop a site in Camperdown, New South Wales, into apartments. Mr Hayes was fined $400.00 in respect of each Hay-Ric Pty Limited and Sunfarm Pty Limited and $800.00 in relation to Gogard Pty Limited. He was also ordered to attend his nearest Police Station for the purpose of being fingerprinted.The charges were prosecuted by the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

smkovalinsky
First Flagged at 8:28 AM, Oct 16, 2009 by smkovalinsky
These members have powered this story:

Related Stories

Recommendations (19)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from