NP Rank:
Barbie is Freakishly Thin, Sure, But She's a Toy Not a Role Model
Barbie is a plastic doll but in this age of plastic surgery and high tech youth serums she still represents a ridiculously unattainable, not to mention extremely unhealthy, ideal. In real world terms Barbie's 4.6 inch bust, 3.5 inch waist, and 5 inch hips would translate into a woman who is smaller than the freakishly thin and tiny Victoria Beckham.
Libby's height of 5ft 6ins (1.68m) was to remain unchanged. Doing the maths, Libby would have an extraordinarily tight waist of just 20ins (50.8cm), while her bust would be 27ins (68.5cm) and her hips 29ins (73.6cm). Even the famously slight Victoria Beckham reportedly only has a 23ins (58.4cm) waist. But neither are they unheard of - Brigitte Bardot was famous for her 20ins (50.8cm) waist.
I can't speak for all women but I know that I don't want to be in any world where Victoria Beckham is considered a big girl. Still shouldn't we all calm down and be realistic ourselves about who and what Barbie really is?
I can honestly say that after an entire childhood spent worshiping Barbie I know that Victoria Beckham is a stick figure. Every time I see a picture of Beckham I want to eat a burger. I know that being that slender is unusual and, for most women, unhealthy.
I played with Barbie as a child and I loved her very much but I can honestly say the last thing I ever thought was that she was an ideal woman. She was small, and plastic, with hair that matted too easily, eyes that wouldn't close and extremities that didn't bend. How is that anything that I would ever aspire to be?
Barbie was a toy that let me escape into a fantasy world where I was a grown up with great clothes, lots of shoes and the perfect boyfriend. I played in that fantasy world and when my Mom called me for dinner I slipped back into reality, and happily I ate. Most nights I even begged for dessert!
I sat across the dinner table from a real woman, my mother, who I truly aspired to be like. I loved my Barbie but I looked down on her. I loved my mother and the other real world women who came into my life, and them I looked up to. They are the measures I used, and still use, as benchmarks to judge my own progress and success as a woman. Not a little plastic doll.
So while I appreciate the argument that Barbie has unrealistic proportions and that girls have serious body image hurdles to deal with I think it is too simple to blame a 50 year old toy doll. No matter how unrealistic her body proportions may be on a real woman Barbie is not and never will be real.
The real women who are impossibly thin, the clothing that is sold in size 00, the retouched photos of girls in bikinis, ANTM with those tiny screaming twenty-somethings, and the fashion shows that feature clothes hanger thin models, these are the sources of real body image pressure. Time to leave little Barbie alone!



Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (6)
at 19:38 on March 6th, 2009
I grew up just loving Barbie as well and I don't have unrealistic body issues either.
at 20:51 on March 6th, 2009
Ha! I liked that article. As they said, no one compares the baby dolls, with their gigantic heads. Why compare Barbie - It's no more real!
They measured the newer Barbie. The original Barbie had an 18" waist. I used to have one of those, before kids. But I'm not 5' 9", or even 5' 2" - she's just so out of proportion - but she was a hit, and that's the bottom line.
Barbie was originally copied from the Bild Lilli doll, which was built from a sexist cartoon in a German paper - if people knew that back in the day, maybe she wouldn't have been such a hit.
at 23:22 on March 6th, 2009
Those dead, dead eyes.
at 05:08 on March 8th, 2009
Thanks for this.
It's a fascinating insight into how children perceive their Barbie dolls.
Do girls keep their Barbie dolls when they grow up? Did any of you keep yours?
Lord knows why that question occured to me, I suppose I was asking myself if girls ever stop having any kind of feelings for their Barbie dolls, and that maybe womeen keep them for reasons of nostalgia.........
at 16:58 on April 6th, 2009
Tina,
Seeing that you are writing about toys being interpreted as role models, I am sure you have encountered the recent controversy surrounding the Nickelodeon character, “Dora the Explorer.” A once spunky, shorts-wearing adventurer, this little character’s makers are now aging her into a tween. Parents are irate and have quickly conjured up petitions to end the evolution of Dora, who they claim is a positive influence for their children. I admire your blog post since you are one of the few people whose unique view collides with the ideal that toys are influential role models. In fact, your opinion may actually serve to reassure many concerned mothers and fathers, because while you worshipped Barbie at one point in time, you have managed to maintain a healthy perception of body image throughout your life. I do agree with you that “it is too simple to blame a 50 year old toy doll.” Indeed, more tangible factors (like real women) probably have a stronger impact on a girl’s idea of what she should aspire to be like. However, I do not think it is completely far-fetched to consider that Barbie may actually wield the power to engender negative thought patterns into young girl’s minds. In one study, Does Barbie Make Girls Want to Be Thin? The Effect of Experimental Exposure to Images of Dolls on the Body Image of 5-8 Year Olds, author Suzan Ive states, “dolls provide a tangible image of the body that can be internalized as part of the child’s developing self-concept and body image.” In Ive’s study, she discovered that in other recent research, it has been found that girls’ desire for thinness emerges around age 6 and that dolls like Barbie, because of their iconic status, are likely to act as salient role models, at least for very young girls. In carrying out her study, Ive was correct. She states in the Discussion and Conclusion section of her research, “[Findings] showed that very young girls experience heightened body dissatisfaction after exposure to Barbie doll images but not after exposure to Emme doll (or control) images.” In other psychology studies in the past, it has similarly been found that children who play violent video games are later proven to be more aggressive, even though they are merely playing a “game” and not reenacting reality. Unfortunately though, not all children are able to separate fantasy play from realism as you did, and so I just hope you do not underestimate the power of social images, even if they are simply toys. With the studies presented, do you still believe people are crazy to blame a 50 year old doll?
at 18:02 on June 8th, 2009
Everyone is focusing on this crazy weight issue....people wake up!!! Parents need to educate their children on healthy body image, nutrition and exercise from a young age. If Barbie is an issue, then simple DONT BUY YOUR CHILD THAT TOY...your as stupid as the parents who buy their young child chips, maccas and chocolates and then complain when the kid is fat and then they go out and try to sue maccas. Parents have control on their child's eating habits, toys and so forth up until the kid can afford to go out and get their own, if they complain then find a nicer alternative but dont always cave in to their demands. Im not placing all the blame on parents but it just seems stupid that a doll is coping blame for weight issues. Barbie should be used as a role model but for different reasons, kids need to be taught from a young age that being skinny is not pretty and neither is being overweight. I gave my two girls barbies from a young age as I looked past the supifical crap and realised that I could teach them something instead of just giving the kids the toys and letting them amuse themselves. Bridgette is now 15 and Mia 12 and they are healthy young girls who still hate their veges but i reward them if they are eaten, ive pthey are encouraged to play outside and i've put them in local sporting groups (which i find cheaper then buying them all the latest computer games etc). Why barbie was a role model was not because of her looks but because she represented brains as well with the many types of dolls you could get, vet, doctor, lawyer, teacher and even the multi-cultural barbies which represent a range of nationalities. It is a good way to help give your child an anti-racist view from a young age. It teaches girls they can be anything they set their mind to, at the moment Mia wants to be a vet, Bridge would love to be a princess lol but when you ask her she wants to teach pre school. Parents need to accept responsibility which I guess is my point, you cant shield your kids from the world but you can help them understand it more and teach them. Stop wasting your time complaining about barbie, fast food, skinny models, obese people, strippers whatever just stop! Take a deep breath and realise that as much as you would like to you cant control the world but you have the chance to change someones opinion on it...your childrens, ok so they might grow up and turn against it but to be honest if it wasnt barbie, or dora or the wiggles you would find something else to hate come on humphery bear is in trouble now for not wearing pants like what the hell...i think parents really need to grow up and stop being so prudish. Spend time with your kids, play barbies with them, talk to them about what they think but this whole whinging mum image is getting old. Dont blame barbie, are you going to stop your kids seeing a skinny girl on the street and wish they looked like her no, are you going to stop them seeing some girl walking around in short shorts in front of your kids no . They need to be exposed to these images early so they can be educated about them