by
BelaynehKassaWubie | August 25, 2010 at 11:43 pm
303 views | 2 Recommendations |
6 comments
Everything of the right side of a body is quick, for example, the hand, the leg, the mind, etc. Women are also quick to decide, feel angry, feel happy, etc. Does that mean women think with their right mind and men with their left mind?
In this case, companies should target women for their new products marketing as women are the emotional than men. Women can buy them quickly because of their emotional buy-in.
Emotion has both advantages and disadvantages. In areas where quick decision is needed such as marine (ship) management, women may be preferable than men. There are many areas or sectors where twice thinking is not needed. There, women fit best.
But in areas of leadership, thinking twice, analysing the past, the present and the future is needed. Given the emotional nature of women, they may not fit in areas of such leadership where thinking and rethinking is needed. It does not mean, however, that there are no women at all fit in leadership areas. There are! But the vast majority of women wherever in the world are emotional and quick decision makers!
Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (6)
at 05:33 on August 29th, 2010
I had promised myself that I would never, ever comment as a non-member on NP, but I cannot contain myself any longer. I have been reading this author's posts for a while now and I simply cannot believe that they are being allowed on NP. (I use the term 'author' liberally.) They are ill-informed, poorly written, deeply sexist and homophobic, and they are making a mockery of everything that NP used to stand for. When I was an editor on this site, I would have 'wrenched' every single one of these posts, and I am 100% confident that this account would have been deleted before long. Please, NP, I know that you and I have come to a parting of the ways, but I still actually care about what happens to you. Please do not allow this drivel to remain on the site if you want any of your former reputation to remain.
at 05:57 on August 29th, 2010
Thank you for the comment Alice. I concur with you. I could not have said it any better my self. :)
at 13:42 on August 29th, 2010
This article was just pointed out to me as well. The article is offensive. The comment following looks like an ad for someone's business. This is not the calibre of reporting/editorialization that Now Public is about.
at 02:29 on August 30th, 2010
Barbara, I just think that it's really sad that NP, which used to enjoy a wealth of talented and insightful writers, now allows (encourages?) these sorts of posts. Even though I am not a member any more, I still drop in occasionally to read posts (because I used to learn a lot here), but I see the content going from bad to worse. And this poster is a representation of that decline. (Sorry, Amy and Jordan; I still have a lot of respect for what you do on the site, and for your continued efforts, but someone has to say it.)
at 21:42 on September 1st, 2010
Well that's a new dimension of thinking and i don't understand whats wrong with this piece of article,its very well written and then again all above comments of women who think only with right part of brain.
at 02:25 on September 2nd, 2010
Thank you TipuSultan! Yes, such conclusion without assessing the merits and demerits of the issue (pieces) is normally expected from individuals who only think with the right side of the mind; and just a good proof of the pieces assumption!