Tattoo Rebellion or Fashionable Accessory

by harringtola | December 10, 2008 at 09:40 pm
1662 views | 20 Recommendations | 3 comments

Tattoos are making a return. Not in a rebellious way. Not as an in your face statement, even in my own family where two of my grown children and now my grandchildren are sporting them. They have professional office jobs and their tattoos are mostly covered by work clothes but they are meant to be seen.
There are still some areas of the body considered more controversial than others. The face for example.

Additionally, I support age limits on tattoos. I think anyone under 25 is too young to make such a life long decision. The age limit varies by state, between the ages of 18 and 21. In some states 16 with parental consent.

My question is always;
What will this look like when you are 70 years old. Will you still be glad you did it? I am sure the parents of Holly Brewer are wondering about the long term impact of Holly's elaborate very in your face (pun intended) design on her later years quality of life.

(Ms) Brewer has an elaborate design on her chin that extends down to cover her neck. She got the initial tattoo almost 14 years ago, when she was 16, and completed it over several years with visits to apprentice tattoo artists from Vermont to Oregon. Though not actually a moko design, hers looks very similar to the chin tattoos historically favored by Maori women and women of other tribal cultures.

"I've always said it must be beard envy," Brewer jokes.


Local musician Holly Brewer, who started getting her face and neck tattoos 14 years ago, says reaction to the art has been mixed. Local musician Holly Brewer, who started getting her face and neck tattoos 14 years ago, says reaction to the art has been mixed. (Evan Richman/Globe Staff) By James Sullivan Globe Correspondent / December 11, 2008



New Hampshire resident Dotty Jenkins doesn't mind the stares. Her hairless scalp is covered with an intricate, colorful web of tattooed images, including flowers, butterflies, and a striking pair of eyes, literally in the back of her head.

There are new ways developed every day for removal of tattoos (by dermatologists and plastic surgeons) but the rule of thumb is that you will pay much more for removal than you paid to have a tattoo applied, definitely monetarilly and possibly in discomfort.

There can be many reasons, some not at all evident to the viewer, for making a choice of this type.

Jenkins started her tattoo collection because she has alopecia universalis, a condition that resulted in the loss of all the hair on her body several years ago. She recently won first prize in a tattoo contest sponsored by Salem's Peabody Essex Museum, in conjunction with "Body Politics," its exhibition on traditional Maori tattooing, or moko.
Just as Jenkins's tattoos are her way of reclaiming pride in her appearance, the Maori of New Zealand have been reclaiming their cultural heritage with their return to traditional face painting. Yet in America, where tattooing has become so commonplace that Angelina Jolie's latest ink grabs almost as much attention as her latest adoption, tattoos above the neck remain a topic of controversy, even among hardcore aficionados.

Even tattoo artists themselves are divided on the wisdom of tattoos above the neck or on the face. There are health concerns as well when tattoos are applied to the tongue or other areas prone to easy infection.

Tattoo artist Todd Close, who recently opened the Inkwell Body Art Studio in Amesbury and served as a judge in the Peabody Essex Museum's contest, says he does see facial tattoos on some of his colleagues in the business. He was particularly impressed with the work done on one acquaintance's snake tattoo, which wrapped around his eye. One recent visitor to his shop had an image of "some kind of horned animal" wrapped around his neck.

"It was bow-tie-ish, in the sense that you couldn't miss it," says Close. "No collar could cover it up."

Still, he says, facial tattoos are not something he has seriously considered offering.

"I did have a girl come in who wanted something on her ears," says Close, who declined to do the work. Instead, he asked her how she felt a prospective employer might feel about that kind of tattoo: "I said, is this going to change your life?"

Close himself has tattoos all over his body, though they're covered on this day by a pair of jeans and a big black hoodie. Plainly visible are the silver-dollar-sized disks stretching his ear piercings and a small ring inserted in one nostril.

But tattoos above the neck - that's where he draws the line.

"My wife would divorce me," he says with a smile.

All in all I think tattoo accessorizing is very much as it always has been, a personal choice that only an adult individual should make for themself. Even with modern science abilities to remove the ink there could be long lasting effects. 

recommend This comment thread is now closed
1
Terri Potratz

I'm not sure that I'm for an over-25 age restriction, but I do think that if you want to get your face tattooed there should be additional steps involved before you get inked, especially if you're young. 

I have a number of tattoos myself (the first one when I was 17) and while I wouldn't necessarily get the same ones if I did it again today, the point is they are a permanent reminder of my own personal history.  And in my opinion, I can't ever regret that - each tattoo represents, at the very least, my frame of mind at the time I got it.  It's an important reminder of who I was at the time.

And finally, my bar of approval regarding employers: if tattoos are an issue, that's not the kind of company I would want to be working for in the first place.  I once quit a job on the first day after being asked to cover up a tattoo.  Get with the times, people.


0
harringtola

So personal choice with long term ramification consideration, right?

Of course as you say, you can only consider the ramifications from your perspective at the time. If you are 15 then your perspective is different than 25.

0
Starr

No tattoos for anyone under 25?! Are you kidding me? They can die in a war at 18, drive at 16, drink at 21 and get married  years younger than that. 25 is ridiculous. I pity your kids.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

Jordan Yerman
First Flagged at 6:44 AM, Dec 11, 2008 by Jordan Yerman
These members have powered this story:

Most Recommended Stories in Style

Recommendations (20)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from