Suing Your Boss: No Longer Just a Fantasy?

by Jordan Yerman | August 21, 2007 at 09:39 am
1583 views | 14 Recommendations | 2 comments

Photos

Air Space

Air Space

see larger image

uploaded by mrclean

If some lawmakers have their way, getting sweet, sweet revenge on one's boss won't just be the subject of a Dolly Parton movie, but all-too-real life:
Lawmakers across the country are considering legislation that would give workers grounds to sue their superiors for being, basically, jerks. Bookstores are stocking bad-boss advice tomes, including "Snakes in Suits" and "Was Your Boss Raised by Wolves?" Today the AFL-CIO will name the worst boss in the country, based on the results of an online contest.

Are relations between workers and management really in such an awful state?

Maybe. The ranks of bullying bosses are growing, some experts contend, as short-staffed companies tap managers with lousy people skills. Others point out that though mean and dimwitted supervisors have been around since work was invented, baby boomers on the cusp of retirement and restless younger employees are more likely to complain or quit than suffer in silence. It's easy to decide against taking the latter tack, thanks to the proliferation of venting websites, among them www.ebosswatch.com.

The AFL-CIO, not surprisingly, puts the blame on management's shoulders. Sure, there have always been bullying bosses, said Karen Nussbaum, executive director of the union's Working America lobbying arm, but today some of them "don't even have good manners anymore."

If that doesn't sound like grounds for a lawsuit, at least four state legislatures are thinking about making it so.

A bill in New Jersey would give an individual the right to seek as much as $25,000 in damages if an employer created "an abusive work environment." Similar measures are pending in New York state, Vermont and Washington state. In California, a Sacramento-based group called California Healthy Workplace Advocates is working to revive a sue-the-boss bill that died in committee in 2003.

The bills are short on specifics, such as what exactly would constitute an abusive work environment, and their prospects are far from certain. The wisdom of giving employees new grounds to sue is debatable, considering the threat of frivolous court-clogging suits and laws at the federal level and in many states that already protect people against, among other things, sexual harassment and discrimination based on gender, race, pregnancy, physical disability and religion.
I'm fortunate to work with people I get along with (and who are no doubt reading this), but I know all too well what it's like to have to answer to a total you-know-what. Still, the potential for abuse of this law is absolutely massive.

recommend This comment thread is now closed
Victoria Revay
Victoria Revay
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 10:05 on August 21st, 2007

jordan,this is great.  I think you're right the implications are huge. I do however agree with you that worl with awesomeness. Yey for us!

gmony714
gmony714
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 13:45 on August 21st, 2007

jordan, good stuff I've had a few that made life impossible.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

Victoria Revay
First Flagged at 10:05 AM, Aug 21, 2007 by Victoria Revay
These members have powered this story:

Most Recommended Stories in Tech & Biz

 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from