NP Rank:
29 Structural & Civil Engineers Cite Evidence for WTC Demolition
This essay is both fascinating and inspiring to read -- after reading claims on wikipedia and in mainstream media that "the engineering community rejects 9/11 conspiracy theories about demolition," it is refreshing to hear from numerous engineers directly, in their own words, who openly reject the official conspiracy theory and challenge the official reports from NIST and FEMA.
To see them, see who they are, and hear their words, is direct evidence of what many have pointed out over the years -- those in the "engineering community" have often not read the official reports and have typically not even seen the videos of events like the destruction of Building 7 since that Tuesday in 2001. This was made clear during interviews with attendees at the 2009 National AIA Convention who often expressed surprise at the videos of the destruction events of the WTC, which they were completely unaware of.
And, like almost everyone else, the engineering community around the world has put their faith in the officials of the NIST and FEMA to have actually explained what happened. As it turns out, engineers are not unlike everyone else -- if the officials reports are wrong, it's easier to just try to ignore such information because to acknowledge it can instill feelings of confusion, guilt and even horror.
Jun 17, 2009
29 Structural & Civil Engineers Cite Evidence for Controlled Explosive Demolition in Collapses of All 3 WTC High-Rises on 9/11
— Gregg Roberts and Staff
More than 700 architects and engineers have joined call for new investigation, faulting official collapse reports
The facts are in. The evidence is conclusive. These experts lay it all out.
For Some, the Doubts Began Early
"Something is wrong with this picture," thought Nathan Lomba, as he watched replays of the Twin Tower collapses on television on September 11, 2001. A licensed structural engineer trained in buildings' responses to stress, Lomba saw more on the screen than you or I. He puzzled, "How did the structures collapse in near-symmetrical fashion when the damage was clearly not symmetrical?"

The facts are in. The evidence is conclusive. These experts lay it all out.

Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (2)
at 14:39 on June 20th, 2009
So what are they saying happened then?
at 15:24 on June 20th, 2009
I recommend these articles:
"Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe"
"Explosives Found in World Trade Center Dust"
The filter isn't allowing me to post links, sorry.