The Accuracy of Ignition Interlock Devices

by mazevedo | January 24, 2009 at 03:44 pm
625 views | 10 Recommendations | 3 comments

Photos

.bubble o bill.

.bubble o bill.

see larger image

uploaded by katekowald

Man in Australia eats Ice cream bar and his car's breathalyzer claims he is positive for alcohol and won't let him start his car.

UPI reports that the unidentified man, who lives in Frankston, Australia, claims he ate Bubble O'Bill ice cream, right before blowing into the breathalyzer, which caused the false positive. Afterwards went before a court asking to have the breathalyzer removed from his car.

The court decided to verify the error with a second test. Without eating the Ice Cream, the man's BAC was .0000. Immediately after taking two bites, it was .0018. The man got his wish, and the breathalyzer was removed. But the larger cause for concern here is what he did to get stuck with the breathalyzer in the first place? And what will he do now that he's no longer shackled to the buzz killer?


This whole situation raised many questions on the accuracy of such equipments.

Assistant Commisioner Ken Lay told 3AW radio drivers could easily record false readings without consuming any alcohol.

"We are aware that a whole host of food, beverages, toothpastes, mouthwashes and the like can effect our preliminary breath tests and also interlock devices,''


Even though these interlock devices might have some issues, they are still considered very beneficial to society.

Victoria runs one of the world's biggest interlock programs, said VicRoads spokeswoman Mary Fall.

"Thousands of trips where someone might have driven under the influence of alcohol have been prevented from interlock devices," she said.

"We certainly see them as an effective tool in terms of stopping drink driving."

recommend This comment thread is now closed
0
Paschen

They should be in every car and Motor bike regardless.

0
Hmmm

Sounds fine until you eat a bubble o bill brush your teeth or eat something else that this technology is not catered for and get stuck in the middle of nowhere. These devices are money makers for the government it has nothing to do with reducing fatalities. There has been no significant drop to fatalities since the introduction of ignition iterlocks.

0
STOPDUIAZ

The reason it gave him a fail positive is the equipment, there are older units out there on the market that use semi conductor technology and there are fuel cell units. Fuel cell units do not give false positives.

semi conductor units are actually now banned to use in many states in the U.S.A for the same reason. And its also the responsibility of the provider to maintain there units Calibrated at all times,to guarantee the accuracy of the reading.

I honestly do think that all vehicles should come with this technology.And they do save lifes.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

Paschen
First Flagged at 12:09 AM, Jan 25, 2009 by Paschen
These members have powered this story:

Most Recommended Stories in Tech & Biz

Recommendations (10)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from