Another Indication that Newspapers are Finished

by Leonard Brody | July 4, 2008 at 09:51 am
521 views | 7 Recommendations | 6 comments

Photos

Death of Newspapers? Save the Press! (Opinion, Analysis)

Death of Newspapers? Save the Press! (Opinion, Analysis)

see larger image

uploaded by PEP

So, stage one is you lose touch with your audience.  Stage two is you lose readership.  Stage three is your advertisers run.  Stage four is your valuations plummet.  Stage five is the analysts stop covering you.  Stage 6?

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Want to buy newspaper stocks? You should see an analyst. Trouble is there aren't many around anymore.

As the valuations of U.S. newspaper publishers plunge and investor interest wanes, the ranks of stock analysts who rate their performance are thinning.

In some ways, there is less need for them as the trend is clear: the U.S. newspaper business is in bad shape and getting worse as readers and advertising dollars flee to the Internet and other new forms of media.

But the void in smart thinking on the publishing sector could exacerbate an already bleak view of the business.

Advertisement
recommend Sign In or Join to post comments
0
Jarrett Martineau

A fascinating discussion on this issue, and the recent Tribune layoffs, continues in the blogosphere:

http://www.jessicadasilva.com/2008/07/02/its-worth-fighting-for/


0
kferaday

That really is an interesting discussion. I think Dasilva is right about the need to innovate but I'm not sure that hyper-localism is the answer. I think of it differently. What we need is hyper-contextualism or as a co-worker calls it semantic reconciliation. That is being able to give me what I need base on who I am right now (there are going to be different versions of "me").

Having that understanding will allow news organizations to organize their content differently -- around my interests, or better yet around a community of interests. Doing that will engage the reader and (if the right tools are available) encourage participation (and stickiness).

I think the role of journalists will change as well. I was involved in a bit of a debate about "though leadership" a couple of weeks ago. The leader of the debate argued that what we need are more thought followers not thought leaders. He also argued that we need more though participation. I agreed with the latter but I argued further that we need thought leaders who, in the Socratic tradition, frame and guide the discussion. I think that's a role that journalists can and should start to play.

0
Jarrett Martineau

And is this the alternative?

If you’re any kind of online publisher — a traditional outlet looking to learn about online media, or a blog network looking to grow — you could do a lot worse than to follow the career of Nick Denton, a former traditional journalist (or at least the British version of same) who has become a new-media mogul thanks to the Gawker Media network of blogs. Nick has been conducting a kind of ongoing media workshop for the past couple of years, right out in the open (more or less). In the latest installment, the Dark Lord of the blogosphere has chopped the pay rate for bloggers at Gawker, for the second time in the last six months.

It’s not quite as bad as it sounds, however. Since the beginning of 2008, bloggers at the various Gawker properties — the flagship celebrity-obsessed blog, geek oracle Gizmodo, gossip rag Valleywag and so on — have been paid in part based on the traffic their posts attract. But that’s not their only pay; they still get a salary. The traffic-based payment is effectively a bonus — an incentive program (although whether it encourages bloggers to go for the cheap and titillating is the subject of debate). In other words, bloggers have to “earn back” their base salary first, and then whatever traffic they get after that is a bonus. And even with the cuts, Gawker bloggers still do pretty well.

What Denton has done, according to the Radar story — which happens to have been written by Choire Sicha, the former editor of Gawker — is to cut the bonus rate to $5 per thousand pageviews, from $6.75. And that previous rate was itself a reduction from the original rate of $7.50 per thousand (all of the Gawker blogs have their own rate structure, but all have seen reductions).


mchawk
mchawk
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 14:17 on July 10th, 2008

Leonard Brody, I like this story. It's good stuff - timely, too.

I have a feeling that newspaper circulations will die-off with their readership.  As if we needed any reminding, the way in which me get our news-fix has changed over the past few years, but don't ring the death-knell for printed papers just yet.

London’s free afternoon newspapers saw distribution dip slightly in May, according to latest ABC figures, although thelondonpaper retains a clear lead.

Associated newspapers’ London Lite dropped 0.21 per cent on April to 401,421 while the News International-owned rival thelondonpaper dropped 0.13 per cent to 500,235.

and the UK National papers aren't quite dead yet, either.

Year on Year sales


0
Lee Lecu

interesting.

Erik Larson
Erik Larson
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 11:27 on August 21st, 2008

Leonard Brody, I like this story. It's good stuff.

On to Stage 6! Long Live the New Media!

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from