NP Rank:
Another Indication that Newspapers are Finished
So, stage one is you lose touch with your audience. Stage two is you lose readership. Stage three is your advertisers run. Stage four is your valuations plummet. Stage five is the analysts stop covering you. Stage 6?
NEW YORK (Reuters) - Want to buy newspaper stocks? You should see an analyst. Trouble is there aren't many around anymore.
As the valuations of U.S. newspaper publishers plunge and investor interest wanes, the ranks of stock analysts who rate their performance are thinning.
In some ways, there is less need for them as the trend is clear: the U.S. newspaper business is in bad shape and getting worse as readers and advertising dollars flee to the Internet and other new forms of media.
But the void in smart thinking on the publishing sector could exacerbate an already bleak view of the business.








Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (6)
at 10:26 on July 4th, 2008
A fascinating discussion on this issue, and the recent Tribune layoffs, continues in the blogosphere:
http://www.jessicadasilva.com/2008/07/02/its-worth-fighting-for/
at 10:30 on July 4th, 2008
And is this the alternative?
Source: mathewingram.com
at 16:35 on July 4th, 2008
That really is an interesting discussion. I think Dasilva is right about the need to innovate but I'm not sure that hyper-localism is the answer. I think of it differently. What we need is hyper-contextualism or as a co-worker calls it semantic reconciliation. That is being able to give me what I need base on who I am right now (there are going to be different versions of "me").
Having that understanding will allow news organizations to organize their content differently -- around my interests, or better yet around a community of interests. Doing that will engage the reader and (if the right tools are available) encourage participation (and stickiness).
I think the role of journalists will change as well. I was involved in a bit of a debate about "though leadership" a couple of weeks ago. The leader of the debate argued that what we need are more thought followers not thought leaders. He also argued that we need more though participation. I agreed with the latter but I argued further that we need thought leaders who, in the Socratic tradition, frame and guide the discussion. I think that's a role that journalists can and should start to play.
at 14:17 on July 10th, 2008
Leonard Brody, I like this story. It's good stuff - timely, too.
I have a feeling that newspaper circulations will die-off with their readership. As if we needed any reminding, the way in which me get our news-fix has changed over the past few years, but don't ring the death-knell for printed papers just yet.
Source: mad.co.uk
and the UK National papers aren't quite dead yet, either.
Year on Year sales
at 16:19 on July 20th, 2008
interesting.
at 11:27 on August 21st, 2008
Leonard Brody, I like this story. It's good stuff.
On to Stage 6! Long Live the New Media!