by
Jason Sanders | August 27, 2008 at 09:58 am
217 views | 2 Recommendations |
2 comments
During the 1990s, small manufacturers began selling ‘Apple’ computers at lower prices than their Apple Macintosh brothers. These generic, PC-like computers were Apple's attempt at increasing their market share, and just like the Emperor, they chose clones. But, after Steve Jobs returned to Apple, he closed down the cloning program, believing that it was too late to pursue.
Well, it's 2008 and Apple has switched to Intel chips, making it simpler for unauthorized dealers to create a cheaper, homemade Mac. Several tutorials on the Internet guide users through the process of building their own "
Hackintosh", but its complexity has prevented mainstream acceptance.
Enter
Psystar Corporation.
Apple filed a copyright infringement lawsuit against Psystar in July, charging the company with illegally selling copies of its Leopard operating system on third-party, generic PC hardware. Apple's end-user licensing agreement specifically forbids installing its OS on non-Apple hardware.
This wasn't entirely unexpected as Apple has stated that it is illegal to operate the OS on third party hardware. In an interesting turn of events, however, Psystar reacted:
Psystar, the small Mac cloner that operates out of a non-descript, Miami industrial park, is going on the offensive. Company officials said Tuesday that they plan to file a countersuit against Apple charging the computer maker with "anticompetitive practices," according to Dow Jones Newswires.
Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (2)
at 12:40 on August 27th, 2008
Maybe I would get interested if the hacintosh had the design elegance of a Macintosh. Then again, probably not.
at 15:25 on September 6th, 2008
I just saw your message in flickr. Sorry for the delay. Anyway can also check my blog for the upcoming tall iPod Nano.
macuser.me has contributed a photo to this story.