Attorneys General's Probes Reveal AIG's Boundless Greed

by A. Tran | March 22, 2009 at 08:49 am
796 views | 76 Recommendations | 10 comments

Photos

NY Attorney General Cuomo Revealed Details of AIG Bonuses

NY Attorney General Cuomo Revealed Details of AIG Bonuses

see larger image

uploaded by A. Tran

In light of the fact that Wall Street, over the years, has a habit of paying big bonuses even when the companies are reporting large losses.

By the same token, in the recent years, state attorneys general have been far more aggressive and successful than federal regulators in pursuing legal actions against companies accused of cheating shareholders and taxpayers. 

The spotlight is currently focusing on AIG's case because bonuses were paid to employees in the Financial Products unit.  It is the same unit that caused the losses that drove AIG toward bankruptcy. This writer had previously reported on this aspect about AIG.

New York Attorney General (AG) Andrew Cuomo has prevailed when his office subpoenaed AIG to provide the names of those bonuses' recipients, which has opened a floodgate for other Attorneys General across the country to subpoena for information.

On Saturday, like AG Cuomo, Connecticut Attorney General (AG), Richard Blumenthal has challenged the legality of AIG's actions as he too, subpoenaed information from the company. 

Attorney General Blumenthal also revealed that the bonuses paid to AIG employees are actually a total of $218 million rather than the $165 million as reported by AIG, which set off a national uproar over the past week. The difference between the two totals is $55 million. 

The total amount of bonuses paid to employees of the embattled insurance giant AIG was $218 million, more than $50 million higher than has widely been reported in the media, Attorney General Richard Blumenthal said.  More than 400 AIG employees received bonuses — starting at $1,000 and ranging up to the $6.4 million reportedly paid to an executive who lives in a mansion in Fairfield, Connecticut.

An AIG spokesperson said that Attorney General Blumenthal is wrong to have included the December 2008 bonuses because technically, it represents last year's bonuses.  

"The payments he appears to be referring to were made months ago, have been widely reported on and were specifically disclosed to the Treasury," spokesman Mark Herr said, adding that the $165 million in "retention payments" to executives of the Financial Products unit were made in March.
 
AG Blumenthal has countered with the argument that it is about the actual sum of bonus payments made from taxpayers' money instead of a monthly or yearly breakdown.  Further, he believes his numbers are correct.
"We've not only added the numbers, but the company has given us documents that have the number at $218 million," Blumenthal said. "Some of that total is from earlier bonuses, but the main point is all of it seems to be out of taxpayer funds. ... Whether the payments were made in December or March seems to be beside the point. The total that was disclosed so far was $165 million." Blumenthal added that his new numbers are correct. "There's certainly no double-counting," he said in an interview from his office Saturday

It is noteworthy that AIG has been bailed out by taxpayers four times to the tune of $173 billion. Yet, AIG is pursuing a suit against the United States government and the people to retrieve additional monies owed to the company. NP Karen Hatter previously reported this story.
A.I.G. is effectively suing its majority owner, the U.S. government, which has an 80 percent stake in the insurer. The company is in effect asking for even more money, in the form of tax refunds. The suit also suggests that A.I.G. is spending taxpayer money to pursue its case, something it is legally entitled to do. Its initial claim was denied by the Internal Revenue Service last year.

The lawsuit, filed Feb. 27, 2009, in U.S. District Court in Manhattan, details, among other things, certain tax-related dealings of the financial products unit, the once high-flying division that has been singled out for its role in A.I.G.’s financial crisis last autumn.

Amid the public furor, the AIG executives in Connecticut continue to believe that they deserve their payments and have filed a suit against the government to obtain their bonuses.  
The Connecticut attorney general also sharply disputed AIG's view that it was legally obliged to pay the bonuses.

"AIG was categorically wrong when it claimed that state labor law compelled payments of these outrageous, unconscionable bonuses," Blumenthal said in a statement.  "A provision in Connecticut law requiring double payment for failure to pay wages does not apply to AIG bonuses," he said, calling it "a joke of a justification to reward financial failure and fiasco."

In addition, Attorneys General from 21 other states have filed subpoenas to obtain names from a plethora of AIG offices in their own states.  
New Jersey Attorney General Anne Milgram said she sent a letter to AIG Chief Executive Officer Edward Liddy demanding a list of employees in the AIG Financial Products unit who received bonuses since September. Milgram said in a statement that she asked AIG to send her the information about bonus recipients and copies of their employment contracts within five days. She was joined in the request by Arizona, Delaware, Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Michigan, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, New Mexico, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Texas, Washington and West Virginia.



Related Articles about Attorney General and AIG by this Writer:

Pythiian1
NY Attorney General Cuomo Revealed Details of AIG Bonuses
President Obama & NY Attorney General Cuomo Outraged by AIG

A Partial List by Other NP Writers:

Karen Hatter: American International Group (AIG) Sues U.S. for $306MTax Refunds
Jordan: Outrage Spreads over AIG Payouts "Too Big to Fail" 

AIG CEO Requests Execs Give Back Half of Bonuses

Esta: Treasury pressure is on, AIG top 25 to receive $1.00 for 2009

-------------
TARP Related Articles by this Writer:

 

Advertisement
recommend This comment thread is now closed
4
Karen Hatter

Excellent coverage as always, Pythiian1.

6
A. Tran

Thank you so much, Karen, for stopping by, reading and recommending my piece. 

The story of AIG is like an endless discovery of massive abuses as it is an insurance company, its financial tentacles are far reaching around the world, not just only in the United States. 

4
Amy Judd

These people just get worse and worse - thanks for the update

12
A. Tran

Thank you so much, Amy, for your read, comments, and recommendation.  Thank you for your interest.

The story as it enfolds is getting worse because it appears that AIG has been duplicitous in reporting all of its bonus-payments across the country since AIG first came to Bush administration for a bail-out, which it had received the TARP funds quite handsomely since last year.  I wonder if AIG had received a good chunk of the Bush administration overpayment of  $78 Billion to banks and companies last year. 


3
eastvanray

Brutal incompetence!  These Obama administration idiots (including Obama himself) are trying to close the barn door after all the horses have already fled.  Why didn't they get this straight BEFORE sending out all that taxpayer money? 

7
A. Tran
Be fair. NowPublic is a community where ad hominem attacks, insults and threats are not tolerated. Discourse should remain civil and focus on the ideas being presented rather than the individuals expressing them.

Look, roy c, I don't mind your comments. Do Not Personalize your Attacks at me and my works. 

If you are that unhappy and angry, by all means, post your own piece.

9
A. Tran

If you read the article as the sources are provided, do feel free to attack the newspaper and the Attorney General Blumenthal.  I am reporting the news, in case you haven't noticed all the sources.  Do read them.

Do Not, once again, talk about my "not having enough guts" because in English, it means a personal attack of another person, whom you do not know. 

As I have always mentioned, post your own pieces and explore your ideas there.

3
tikun

This whole blame game regarding the incompetence of both administrations is horrendous. AIG was once the most successful international insurance company in the world. It got tainted not by their right as a public company to give bonuses, before the govt. monies were given to them, but by the lack of interest by the previous administration to enforce the guidelines for banking procedures. But it does not end there. Thanks to Barney Frank and his "ex-lover" who was a big honcho at freddie  Barney Frank pushed hard for an easing of the requirements to receive and give loans. There were also racial-discrimination accusations made to some members of congress when they opposed the legislation.

The corruption by both administrations and the arrogance of the present one leaves little room for healing or change.

Now that AIG has been given/taken monies from the public coffers it is their responsibility to the taxpayers not to exploit the loopholes. However, the rhetoric from the administration  in order to spin the story away from the incompetence is scary and dangerous. 

Roy brings up some very good questions concerning the players in this mess and I believe that they are worth a serious look.

Until this government stops using "crisis" as a means to pay back their "old-boy" network with oppressive and anti-democratic laws proposed we  are all in for some serious and dangerous erosion of our rights. 

There have been men/women before president Obama that havecome on the national scene that also spoke with a silver tongue and were bright as anyone could have hoped for but led us down the path not to "heaven on earth" but to the grapes of wrath.


1
tikun

With the present administration calling for blood and asking that the names be made public is irresponsible and dangerous. It is nothing  more than a spin and a childish tactic that will get  people hurt. Creating phony  legislation  that will never pass muster because of its punitive nature is nothing more then politics  as usual. Wheres the beef/change?

4
Tamiya

In all this mess, I find few things to be quite interesting:

(1)   Where were all these politicians when the initial bail out agreement was given to AIG that had the clauses to allow bonuses? I believe they were still in the office.

(2)   Why a guy just hired 6 months ago is getting grilled for all the chaos?

(3)   Is it fair for the same politicians to accept large sums of money for political campaigns from AIG within last one year?

The bonuses are a disgrace; however, how it came to this just did not happen overnight or without the help of many of the politicians questioning AIG.

And above all, now the AIG using the part of the Taxpayers bail out money to sue Taxpayers.

 

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

NowPublic on Facebook

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

mtammas
First Flagged at 10:15 AM, Mar 22, 2009 by mtammas
These members have powered this story:

Related Stories

Recommendations (76)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from