Bank of America to Repay $45 Billion in Tarp

by snuffysmith | December 2, 2009 at 04:00 pm
162 views | 0 Recommendations | 7 comments

BofA to Repay $45 Billion in TARP

Bank of America to Repay Entire $45 Billion in TARP to U.S. Taxpayers Company to Increase Capital, Enhancing Tier 1 Common Capital Ratio
Press Release from BofA

Bank of America to Repay Entire $45 Billion in TARP to U.S. Taxpayers

From CNBC: BREAKING NEWS:

CNBC’s Charlie Gasparino tells the desk that Bank of America is going to repay $45 billion and get out of the TARP program.And they will raise capital over the next few days, he adds.

From the WSJ: Bank of America to Repay $45 Billion in TARP


The bank plans to raise about $20 billion in new capital ... a move required by federal regulators to ensure the bank has sufficient capital reserves and won't need to come back to the government for additional aid.

While this is good news for the US Taxpayer, it raises the questions of how Bank of America is going to pay for this and whether the shareholders are going to take a real haircut in stock dilution.

Advertisement
recommend This comment thread is now closed
0
snuffysmith

Bank of America to Repay Bailout, Easing CEO Search (Bloomberg)

0
snuffysmith

Is Repaying TARP Good for Bank of America (and Taxpayers?)

The Bank of America stock offering, which will be used to repay the TARP, went off well, so surely this means the Charlotte bank is on the mend and its finances are sound, right?Chris Whalen, who is an expert on the banking industry and has a proprietary database that measures the risk of individual banks, doesn’t buy it:

We are reaffirming our “negative” outlook on operating results for BAC….

We…look at the specific transaction proposed by BAC, we see the repayment of government TARP equity and a $20 billion reduction in the overall capital of BAC at precisely the time when the Fed is withdrawing many forms of subsidies for the largest banks. Assuming that BAC can place $18.8 billion in new securities and sell $4 billion in assets at valuations that do not generate capital losses, the consolidated entity ends up with $20 billion less capital on a consolidated basis than today.

Ahem, the point of this exercise was to make sure the banks came out sounder, and did not weaken themselves by paying back the TARP funding. Instead, the reverse is happening. A company that threw a fit to get funding from Uncle Sam early this year is now depleting its capital….so it can pay executives better than if it was on the government short leash.

Scrimping on capital to show better returns to allow for bigger bonuses is looting, and it’s what got us in this mess in the first place. But here the authorities are now enabling this process, because “paying back the TARP,” no matter what the true costs and risks are, validates Obama’s economic programs.

0
snuffysmith


0
snuffysmith


0
snuffysmith


0
snuffysmith

Bank of America Securities Sale Raises $19.3 Billion (Bloomberg)

0
snuffysmith

Bank of America TARP Repayment Premature, Analyst Says

A leading bank analyst says the regulators who allowed Bank of America to repay its $45 billion in government bailout funds made a big mistake because the bank may well need that money soon to withstand the next wave of bad loans, the withdrawal of federal subsidies, and the possible reevaluation of assets.

 Christopher Whalen, a bank analyst at Institutional Risk Analytics, says Bank of America's loans continue to sour. Defaults more than tripled from the first quarter to the third; loans more than 90 days delinquent and those so late they're no longer accruing interest have shot up 15 percent, according to an analysis of banking data. That's because, despite signs of recovery at the macro level, it takes time for homeowners to become delinquent on their mortgages and credit cards after a job loss.

To pay taxpayers back, the firm says it will use about $26 billion in excess cash "at precisely the time when the [Federal Reserve] is withdrawing many forms of subsidies for the largest banks", notes Whalen's IRA Advisory Service report. That cash could be used to guard against future losses.

"If you want a very tangible example of why the Fed should be taken out of the business of bank supervision, it is precisely the TARP repayment by [Bank of America]," Whalen writes. The Fed supervises Bank of America because it is a bank-holding company. While other regulators supervise units of the firm, the Fed is responsible for the entire corporation. The bank can't repay taxpayers without the Fed's permission.

Whalen argues that bank regulators should force the firm to raise capital now and keep it until the middle of next year when Bank of America's losses are more clear.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from