Canadian judge rules linking is not defamation

by Alfred Hermida | October 28, 2008 at 06:09 pm
99 views | 10 Recommendations | 1 comment

In what is being seen as a landmark ruling, a judge in Canada has decided that a website is not liable for the sites it links to.

The case has been greeted by some as a landmark ruling. It centred on a defamation lawsuit launched by a former Green Party official Wayne Crookes against p2pnet and several other websites. Crookes alleged that these sites were guilty of defamation because they carried links to articles he said were defamatory.

However B.C. Supreme Court judge Stephen Kelleher decided that linking by itself is not sufficient to make a case for defamation. In his ruling (PDF), he likened linking to a footnote:

A hyperlink is like a footnote or a reference to a website in printed material such as a newsletter. The purpose of a hyperlink is to direct the reader to additional material from a different source. The only difference is the ease with which a hyperlink allows the reader, with a simple click of the mouse, to instantly access the additional material.

In a video interview, the lawyer for p2pnet Dan Burnett, explained that this was a very significant ruling as the link is the glue of the internet.

recommend This comment thread is now closed
Terri Potratz
Terri Potratz
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 18:14 on October 28th, 2008

Alfred Hermida, I like this story. It's good stuff.

Very interesting..

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from