NP Rank:
Capitalism and Evolution
There are many people, especially in America, who believe in capitalism but not in evolution. They find it impossible to believe that life in all its richness and intricacy could have "just happened" and believe that the only possible explanation is design by an intelligent Creator. In fact it could have very well "just happened," and to understand this one needs look no further than the good ole American capitalism.
People who have no knowledge of capitalist economics, such as ones who lived in the Soviet Union, frequently find it unfathomable how a system like America's, which is not command-control, could have such an intelligent design. That there is a store for everything, there is something for every purse and purpose, and pieces fit together, leads them to think that all this prosperity must have been designed by the government. Of course that is not the case, and most of what is bought and sold in America was produced by private businesses with no connection to one another. It happened because people kept looking for opportunities to make money - and found them by producing one or another thing that people would want to buy. As they competed with one another, they put pressure on one another to produce quality goods. As they became wealthier, there consumed more, creating opportunity for other people to produce other, new goods that did not exist previously. And that is how the American system was made possible, and achieved greater intelligence and quality of products than did centrally planned systems.
The exact same thing has happened in the natural world. Mutation by mutation, different forms of life arose and either survived or didn't. As more life forms came about, there was more biomass for other new life forms to arise. Competition perfected them all to an exceptionally high level. And the result was a planet verdant, rich, beautiful, exquisitely balanced, with millions of unique and intricate life forms existing in dynamic equilibrium - a process that took over 4 billion years, and that could easily have taken place all by
itself.
If a process like capitalism can over two hundred years create the wealth and vibrancy of America - including such hi-tech contraptions as supercomputers, nanotechnological devices, credit cards,
artificial limbs, space vehicles - over two hundred years, then what can take place over 4 billion years? Evolution may seem incredible, but becomes less so when considering what capitalism accomplished over a vastly shorter period of time. Nature does not require an intelligent creator to explain all its richness and intricacy any more than America requires an absolute monarch to explain the vibrancy of its economy. Indeed, if one is to look at example of centrally planned economic systems, a nature put into place by the dictate of an intelligent creator would be expected to be a lot less rich place than it is.
So this is the way to conceptualize it. If you respect capitalism, then you should also respect evolution. The two processes have a lot in common, and understanding one allows one to understand the other. Nature no more requires an intelligent creator to make it possible than does capitalism require central planning to achieve what it has achieved. Indeed, an intelligent creator would probably be seen by plants and animals to be as much of a pest as many economic players in America see the federal government. But that is a theme for another essay.
NowPublic on Facebook
Recommendations (4)
-
YankeeJim
Arlington, Virginia, United States -
eastvanray
vancouver, British Columbia, Canada


Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (4)
at 00:15 on June 12th, 2010
Capitalism, like all economic systems is deeply flawed, and prone to wild dips and depressions that often prove disastrous. The Depression, the recent banking crisis, the economic collapse of countries like Greece demonstrate that. It has not survived with government aid to prop it up at its weakest moments. Creation, on the other hand, is an amazingly complex and diverse system that includes countless galaxies that are precise in operation. Indeed, we could not put a man on the moon without relying on the mathematical laws that govern the movement of the planets. That mathematical precision is also seen in the fundamental forces of physics. Like Capitalism, Creation also needs fine tuning to insure that it continues to operate, and it does so with infinitely greater success. Capitalism relies on governments and economists to correct it (albeit with very limited success), who or what is the mathmetician that keeps Creation finely tuned and operating smoothly?
at 21:57 on June 12th, 2010
So you propose there being a creator God, who is a mathematician.
Meanwhile most of your constituents see anyone who take mathematics and science seriously as a satanic commie nerd.
According to your logic then, the "satanic commie nerds" are closer to God than most Christians and Muslims.
I will be sure to pass that message along.
at 08:14 on June 13th, 2010
Are you suggesting, by contrast, that Creation is not in any way flawed?How to you see "creations" such as AIDS, torture, rape, small pox, polio, lynchings, train wrecks, abandoned children, war, famine, crime, and countless other examples of what most people would not consider to be facets that are "finely tuned and operating smoothly"?
at 05:52 on July 21st, 2010
Respect for capitalism? Capitalism is flawed and the results of our economic theory can be seen in the headlines of the last decade. The essential oversight in our economic theory is that it relies heavily on mathematics yet fails to factor in the variables of our capacity for greed and hypocrisy as human beings. The economic crises of these last few years is directly attributable to the leadership of Corporate America and the success of their vast lobbying efforts in Congress (hands off!). Unchecked and unrestrained, their capacity for greed and corruption appears to knows no bounds. Nice theory but the results have proven devastating for the average American - trickle down doesn't work. The entire capitalistic system needs to be redesigned to include some form of social responsibility for ALL stakeholders (employees, community, and the environment).