NP Rank:
Cassini and IBEX Set to Rewrite the Textbooks on the Solar System
Science's understanding of the physics of our own solar system is due for an overhaul. Recent papers from the IBEX and Cassini teams are set to overturn existing models. Those models failed to predict significant real-world features found in mission data. Scientists are headed back to the drawing board.
It would seem that, in a double blow, both the Cassini and Interstellar Boundary Explorer (IBEX) teams have delivered new empirical data about the heliosphere that fundamentally differs from existing models.
The sun's environment in interstellar space — the heliosphere — is essentially a bubble that encompasses the entire solar system and has a diameter about 100 times the distance from the Earth to the sun.
The Cassini results appear to indicate that the solar system inhabits a bubble-shaped heliosphere rather than the expected comet-shaped heliosphere. (Paper here: 1)
As the solar wind flows from the sun, it carves out a bubble in the interstellar medium. Models of the boundary region between the heliosphere and interstellar medium have been based on the assumption that the relative flow of the interstellar medium and its collision with the solar wind dominate the interaction. This would create a foreshortened “nose” in the direction of the solar system’s motion, and an elongated “tail” in the opposite direction.
Images from one of the Magnetospheric Imaging Instrument’s sensors, the Ion and Neutral Camera (MIMI/INCA), on NASA’s Cassini spacecraft suggest that the heliosphere may not have the comet-like shape predicted by existing models.
“These images have revolutionized what we thought we knew for the past fifty years; the sun travels through the galaxy not like a comet but more like a big, round bubble” said Stamatios Krimigis, principal investigator for MIMI, which is orbiting Saturn. “It’s amazing how a single new observation can change an entire concept that most scientists had taken as true for nearly fifty years.”
The IBEX results indicate the presence of an arc-shaped ribbon of high-energy neutral particles that was unanticipated by existing popular models of the heliosphere. (Papers available here: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5)
Launched one year ago into very high altitude Earth orbit, IBEX has been busy measuring how ions in the solar wind interact with the plasma from interstellar space. IBEX will tell us more about the shape of the solar system’s protective “bubble” –- called the heliosphere –- which is created by the solar wind and shields us from harmful galactic cosmic rays.
"Nature is full of surprises, and IBEX has been lucky to discover one of those surprises," said Priscilla Frisch, a senior scientist in astronomy & astrophysics at the University of Chicago.
What the [IBEX] mission has not found is what they were expecting, that is, evidence of large-scale dynamic processes that might be analogous to storms and tornados from the collision of a cold front and a warm front. A striking result is that "our maps show structure and energy spectra that are completely different from what any model has predicted," [Herbert Funsten] noted.
"We were expecting tie-dye and instead found noodle soup," Funsten said.
The ribbon also has fine structure -- small filaments of ENA [energetic neutral atom] emission no more than a few degrees wide ... The fine structure is as much of a mystery as the ribbon itself, researchers say.
Are the ENAs spread evenly across the sky?
No! This is an amazing discovery! There is an arc-shaped region in the sky that is creating a large amount of ENAs, showing up as a bright, narrow ribbon on the maps. Before the IBEX spacecraft was launched, scientists used models to predict the ENA pattern across the sky. These models predicted variations of only tens of percents across the sky—in contrast, IBEX observes variations that are literally hundreds of percents over small angles in the sky. In other words, we are not only seeing ENAs in an unexpected pattern, we are seeing many more ENAs from small regions than we thought we would.
In the paper, author Herbert Funsten notes "We have discovered an arc-shaped ribbon of high-pressure material that looks to be piled-up material from the Sun. The IBEX maps and the discovery of the ribbon are completely different from what we thought it should look like."
The ribbon is the source of intense emissions of energetic neutral atoms (ENAs), which IBEX specializes in detecting. Its presence appears to be at odds with the current model of the heliosphere, which scientists believed is shaped like a comet by the collision of the outgoing solar wind and the galactic wind, which blows outside the heliosphere.
Previously, the only direct evidence about this giant bubble came from the two Voyager spacecraft, which reached the inner edge of this boundary zone about two years ago and provided in-situ glimpses of two particular points on that shell.
The narrow ribbon snakes along this bubble's inner wall between Voyager 1 and 2, twin spacecraft that have been exploring the solar system's boundary since 2004 and 2007, respectively.
Voyager data, taken from specific regions within the boundary zone, had offered no hint that the ribbon existed. But from its orbit around Earth, NASA's Interstellar Boundary Explorer, or IBEX, spacecraft was able to give researchers a wider view.
"They were both out there making these local observation and had no idea that the main 'storm' so to speak was running right down between them," added McComas, a senior executive director with the San Antonio, Texas-based Southwest Research Institute.
"Can you imagine trying to determine the weather of the entire Earth from two weather stations? You can't do it," Christian told reporters at a press conference this afternoon.
"IBEX is like our first weather satellite, and it gives us the full picture [of the heliosphere]."
IBEX provides "the first all-sky view of this region, and no one was expecting what we've seen," [Geoffrey] Crew says. Oddly enough, the energetic ribbon that circles the whole sky doesn't seem to follow the ecliptic (the plane in which all of the planets orbit). Nor does it follow the plane of the galaxy we inhabit, the Milky Way. "Who ordered this?" Crew exclaims. "It doesn't line up with anything!"
Cassini's and IBEX's results seem to be complementary.
The results from Cassini complement and extend findings from NASA's Interstellar Boundary Explorer, or IBEX, spacecraft. Data from IBEX and Cassini have made it possible for scientists to construct the first comprehensive sky map of our solar system and its location in the Milky Way galaxy.
But, both results appear to indicate that our solar system may be far more strongly influenced by external magnetic forces from our parent galaxy (the Milky Way) that was previously acknowledged.
In their first big-picture view of the heliosphere, scientists discovered a well-defined ribbon of neutrally charged particles, precisely tailored -- process unknown -- by magnetic fields in the interstellar sea.
One important clue: The ribbon runs perpendicular to the direction of the galactic magnetic field just outside the heliosphere...
"We're still trying to understand this unexpected structure, and we believe that the interstellar magnetic forces are associated with the enhanced ENA production at the ribbon," [Priscilla] Frisch said.
The bright ribbon appears to be shaped by the direction of the interstellar magnetic field outside the heliosphere. Scientists think this suggests that the galactic environment just outside the solar system has far more influence on the structure of the heliosphere than previously believed.
"This ribbon is organized around this magnetic field," said Rosine Lallement, senior scientist at the French National Center for Scientific Research in Paris. "It is truly new physics."
"[The ribbon is] aligned by and dominated by the external magnetic field," McComas said in a briefing Thursday. "That's a huge clue as to what's going on. But still we're missing some really fundamental aspect of the interaction -- some fundamental physics is missing from our understanding."
"That cannot be a coincidence," says [David] McComas. But what does it mean? No one knows. "We're missing some fundamental aspect of the interaction between the heliosphere and the rest of the galaxy. Theorists are working like crazy to figure this out."
"Theories are flying," [Geoffrey] Crew says. One suggestion is that the ribbon of energetic neutral atoms may have to do with the effect of the local galactic magnetic field pushing against the heliosphere. These observations suggest that the ribbon is perpendicular to that [interstellar] magnetic field, he says.
One idea is that, wherever the Milky Way's magnetic field presses on the heliosphere, more ENAs are created.
"Exactly where the [galaxy's] magnetic field is most wrapped around the outer boundary of the heliosphere, that's where the ribbon runs," McComas said.
"That could be an unbelievably remarkable coincidence, or it could be a fabulous clue that somehow this external magnetic field is actually imprinting onto our heliosphere through some process that we don't yet understand."
The INCA images [from Cassini] suggest that the solar wind’s interaction with the interstellar medium is instead more significantly controlled by particle pressure and magnetic field energy density.
“The map we’ve created from INCA’s images suggests that pressure from a hot population of charged particles and interaction with the interstellar medium’s magnetic field strongly influence the shape of the heliosphere,” says Don Mitchell, MIMI/INCA co-investigator at APL.
"The ribbon [discovered in the IBEX data] follows a circular arc of high pressure that we believe is centered on the direction of the magnetic field of the interstellar cloud through which we are moving," Funsten said. This magnetic field seems to fundamentally organize the interaction region.
The results of IBEX not only reveal fundamental properties of the heliosheath but also provide key information about the properties of the interstellar cloud through which our galaxy is moving. We will be moving out of the cloud in about 10,000 years; the IBEX results will help us understand how the Earth's space environment might be different when this happens.
IBEX data suggest the alignment of the ribbon is related to the local interstellar magnetic field, which could mean that its origins lie outside of the solar system. The ribbon also appears to have a fine structure, suggesting that the ion concentrations vary along its length.
The first all-sky maps developed by NASA's Interstellar Boundary Explorer (IBEX) spacecraft, the initial mission to examine the global interactions occurring at the edge of the solar system, suggest that the galactic magnetic fields had a far greater impact on Earth's history than previously conceived, and the future of our planet and others may depend, in part, on how the galactic magnetic fields change with time.
The interaction between the solar wind and the medium of our galaxy creates a complex host of interactions, which has long fascinated scientists, and is thought to shield the majority of harmful galactic radiation that reaches Earth and fills the solar system.
"The magnetic fields of our galaxy may change the protective layers of our solar system that regulate the entry of galactic radiation, which affects Earth and poses hazards to astronauts," says Nathan Schwadron of Boston University's Center for Space Physics and the lead for the IBEX Science Operations Center at BU.
"The most striking feature is the ribbon [discovered in the IBEX data] that appears to be controlled by the magnetic field of our galaxy," says Schwadron.
Although scientists knew that their models would be tested by the IBEX measurements, the existence of the ribbon is "remarkable" says Geoffrey Crew, a Research Scientist at MIT and the Software Design Lead for IBEX. "It suggests that the galactic magnetic fields are much stronger and exert far greater stresses on the heliosphere than we previously believed."
Adds Schwadron,"Any changes to our understanding of the heliosphere will also affect how we understand the astrospheres that surround other stars. The harmful radiation that leaks into the solar system from the heliosphere is present throughout the galaxy and the existence of astrospheres may be important for understanding the habitability of planets surrounding other stars."
The newest data sets appear set to overturn existing models and rewrite the textbooks relating to the function and structure of the heliosphere.
"This is a shocking new result," says IBEX principal investigator Dave McComas of the Southwest Research Institute. "We had no idea this ribbon existed -- or what has created it. Our previous ideas about the outer heliosphere are going to have to be revised."
"It shows that what we thought we understood about this interaction is definitely not right," McComas said. "We kind of have to go back and start over."
The textbook descriptions of the heliosphere, according to Science's accompanying news story, will have to be entirely rewritten.
So, it's beginning to become increasingly apparent that science has been off-target for some time and has missed some critical portion of the bigger picture. Current models do not adequately describe or explain the structure of the heliosphere and some new ideas are needed. The galaxy's magnetic field appears to play a more dominant role in the structure of the outer heliosphere that has heretofore been acknowledged and that may translate to a larger-than-expected effect on the structure and function within the heliosphere by extension.
If magnetic fields play a more major role than expected in solar system dynamics, must we also consider that electric fields and electric currents factor non-trivially into the equation as well? Considering we already know that a heliospheric current sheet exists within our solar system and an interplanetary magnetic field permeates the space between solar system bodies, is it reasonable to wonder whether there is an electric field potential between the sun and the heliopause to drive the current sheet?
Are major components of our solar system regulated from without rather than from within? Are we subject to the whims of our parent galaxy? Time will tell.
NowPublic on Facebook
Crowd Power
-
mgmirkin
Beaverton, Oregon, United States
Recommendations (45)
-
Sputnic
London, United Kingdom 
Anonymous user
-
Amy Judd
Vancouver, Canada -
Tomitheos Linardos
Toronto, Ontario, Canada -
Uwe Paschen
Narita, Chiba, Japan -
Hugh Askew
Omaha, Nebraska, United States











Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (11)
at 00:02 on October 19th, 2009
[Quote]"This is a shocking new result," says IBEX principal investigator Dave McComas of the Southwest Research Institute.[/Quote]
Shocking! Wait till he hears about the Electric Universe!
These discoveries are great findings for science....next step is to compare notes with Electric Universe Theory.
at 08:05 on October 19th, 2009
I'll be interested to see / hear Wal Thornhill's response to the findings. Should be interesting to compare models and see how things stack up. See if things require "minor tweaking" or "major overhaul."
Anomalies are a great day for furthering science, as they allow the chance to revisit existing theories and replace them with better ones as necessary.
at 02:39 on October 19th, 2009
"So, it's beginning to become increasingly apparent that science has been off-target for some time and has missed some critical portion of the bigger picture."
ummm, i was taught that science has ALL the answers. is never wrong, and learned from observation that questioning was heresy, punishment being scorn and abuse.
at 08:07 on October 19th, 2009
And here I was taught that falsifiability is the cornerstone of science (according to Popper), and that erroneous theories and results could be falsified and require replacement due to a single piece of evidence that doesn't fit.
As I said above, anomalies are a good day for science. :) Gives us a chance to learn something new.
at 08:12 on October 19th, 2009
Well, I wouldn't worry too much about it. Nothing has changed physically since a few days ago or a few months ago. It's just that we now know more about what's going on out there. It's not like there's more or stronger magnetic fields out there, in reality, we just happen to know now that they play a larger role than we'd been led to believe.
One's tempted to recall the old Chinese curse: may we live in interesting times!
at 06:50 on October 19th, 2009
It seems there will always be new variables in the equation of our quest to refine our outlook of our universe and with new developing technological tools every day, it probably will not be the last rewrite about the sun's environment (the heliosphere) either, thanks for the update Michael, it's well written.
at 08:09 on October 19th, 2009
Thanks,
Actually, I kind of wish it was more in my own words and not told via quotes. But others put things so well, it just seems like the quotes tell the story quite well. Surprise, exasperation, crazy theories flying about, needing to rewrite all the textbooks about the solar system.
at 13:30 on October 19th, 2009
Not only is the Universe stranger than we imagine; it is stranger than we CAN imagine. -Einstein
at 13:46 on October 19th, 2009
Wouldn't entirely disagree.
at 10:10 on October 20th, 2009
science, like medicine is something that must be continually evaluated I think so that it doesn't get stale and we don't forget that we are part of a bigger picture.