Congress approved! Bailout bill details

by Tina Kells | October 3, 2008 at 10:31 am
3653 views | 9 Recommendations | 9 comments

The second bailout plan has been approved by Congress, and the details of the revised package contain some important differences from the rejected original. Take a look at the new bailout bill details; or, read a pdf version of the full text of the bailout bill for yourself.

The details of the revised bailout plan include provisions to address the following issues:

  • the credit crunch,
  • taxpayer protection,
  • control over executive pay and perks,
  • establishes two oversight committees,
  • three key tax breaks,
  • new accounting standards,
  • temporarily increased FDIC limits,
  • foreclosure relief,
  • and cost management.

On the credit crunch:

The core of the bill the House will vote on is the same as what it rejected on Monday: the Treasury's proposal to let financial institutions sell to the government their troubled assets, mostly mortgage-related. It would only allow the Treasury access to the $700 billion in stages, with $250 billion being made available immediately.

On protecting taxpayers:

The bill is also similar to the original House bill in that it includes a number of provisions that supporters say would protect taxpayers. One would direct the president to propose a bill requiring the financial industry to reimburse taxpayers for any net losses from the program after five years. And the Treasury would be allowed to take ownership stakes in participating companies.


The bill includes a stipulation that the Treasury set up an insurance program - to be funded with risk-based premiums paid by the industry - to guarantee companies' troubled assets, including mortgage-backed securities, purchased before March 14, 2008.


On executive pay limits:

The bill would place curbs on executive pay for companies selling assets or buying insurance from Uncle Sam. For example, any bonus or incentive paid to a senior executive officer for targets met would have to be repaid if it's later proven that earnings or profit statements were inaccurate.

The formation of two oversight committees:

The bill would set up two oversight committees.

A Financial Stability Board would include the Federal Reserve chairman, the Securities and Exchange Commission chairman, the Federal Home Finance Agency director, the Housing and Urban Development secretary and the Treasury secretary.

A congressional oversight panel, to which the Financial Stability Board would report, would have five members appointed by House and Senate leadership from both parties.

Three tax breaks:

The Senate-version of the bill that the House is considering on Friday includes three key tax elements designed to attract House Republican votes.

It would extend a number of renewable energy tax breaks for individuals and businesses...

The legislation would also continue a host of other expiring tax breaks...

... relief for another year from the Alternative Minimum Tax, without which millions of Americans would have to pay the so-called "income tax for the wealthy."

New accounting practices:

The bill underlines the Securities and Exchange Commission's power to change accounting rules on how banks and Wall Street firms value securities, and directs the agency to study the issue.

Temporary increase in FDIC limits:

The bill temporarily raises the FDIC insurance cap to $250,000 from $100,000. The bill allows the FDIC to borrow from the Treasury to cover any losses that might occur as a result of the higher insurance limit.

Foreclosure relief:

The bill calls on federal agencies to encourage loan servicers to modify mortgages by a number of means - including reducing the principal or interest rate. It also extends a temporary provision that exempts from federal income tax any debt forgiven by a bank to a borrower in a foreclosure.

Cost management:

The Congressional Budget Office said it cannot estimate the net budget effects of the troubled asset program because of the many unknowns about that piece of the bill. However, the agency noted in a letter to lawmakers on Wednesday, it expects the program "would entail some net budget cost" but that it would be "substantially smaller than $700 billion."




recommend This comment thread is now closed
0
Emilio Lizardo

Experiment in Error

"Amend the title so as to read: 'To provide authority for the Federal Government to purchase and insure certain types of troubled assets for the purposes of providing stability to and preventing disruption in the economy and financial system and protecting taxpayers, to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide incentives for energy production and conservation, to extend certain expiring provisions, to provide individual income tax relief, and for other purposes'". - from p.451 of HR1424

theunderminer
theunderminer
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 11:12 on October 3rd, 2008

Tina Kells, nice one!

Emilio Lizardo
Emilio Lizardo
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 11:17 on October 3rd, 2008

Tina Kells, I like this story. It's good stuff.

Edmund Jenks
Edmund Jenks
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 11:31 on October 3rd, 2008

Tina Kells:

We now have a federalized real estate market.

Clause 110 spells it all out where federal regulators will respond for pleas from homeowners to pressure banks to lower interest rates, extend the term duration, reduce the principal - basically mess with the free market on all levels of the transaction in the first place. Isn't that how we got here in the first place ... with the Government backing transactions with ZERO money down and NO INCOME to justify the agreement.

Thanks Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, Chris Cox, and President George Bush for the socialism and watching out for our freedoms - NOT!

... and thank you Tina Kells for breaking out some of the highlights of this fiasco.

0
Emilio Lizardo

I saw one of those spin-producing soundbytes a day or two ago ... an unnamed congressman was describing the reasons he would vote against the bill - one of them being the following ( and paraphrasing, of course ) : "I'm 'a not 'a gonna eat this f< expletive deleted > cow-pie with a marshmellow in the middle' ...

I never saw one of those f< expletive deleted > words used in a congressional address ... do they really talk that way on the hill ?

0
Jordan Yerman

They totally do... it's like Deadwood. (<-- some serious profanity in that link, but you'll all click it anyway)

0
Jordan Yerman

Great job with this- shedding light on a very obfuscation-friendly package. I, for one, do not feel particularly bailed out by this.

0
martdod

Congress bails themselves out of a mess... see who is to blame, who has benefited, follow the money . Watch the following video and know the truth. Check the facts out for yourself don't believe me do your own research. Check out this video then check out the facts.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1RZVw3no2A4

0
doug 447

I have been looking everywhere for the details on where the 800 billion goes but cant find a lick of info on it. if anyone knows where i can find out the exact details please send me a link thanks.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

theunderminer
First Flagged at 11:12 AM, Oct 3, 2008 by theunderminer
These members have powered this story:

Most Recommended Stories in Tech & Biz

 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from