CRTC rules against Canadian web customers

by mtippett | November 20, 2008 at 09:52 am
264 views | 36 Recommendations | 3 comments

Photos

CRTC head at CAB in Ottawa

CRTC head at CAB in Ottawa

see larger image

uploaded by mtippett

The CRTC just dealt a devastating blow to anyone invovled in Canadian new media as well as anyone who uses the web in this country.  Their latest ruling will have negative consquences for new media start ups in Canada because it confers even more advantage to big established media at the expense of small media.  

Enjoy your streaming Youtube while it lasts because it may not last for long.  This is very bad for all of us.  Please get involved.  Here is how to help.

Promises broader inquiry into issue of throttling and network neutrality

Vancouver, November 20, 2008: In a move that has disappointed many Canadian high-tech leaders and public interest groups, the CRTC has announced that it will not force Bell Canada to stop its controversial Internet throttling practices. The decision has renewed calls for Canada's policymakers to protect "net neutrality," the principle that all online content and services should be treated equally without discrimination.

The CRTC decision comes in response to a request from the Canadian Association of Internet Providers (CAIP) that Bell stop throttling other Internet service providers that use its network. More than 2,000 Canadians across the country filed letters with the CRTC supporting CAIP’s request.

CAIP has been in limbo since April waiting for the CRTC decision. CAIP argued that Bell’s throttling practices violated telecommunication regulations, gave Bell an unfair market advantage, and interfered with Canadians' online privacy.

SaveOurNet.ca coordinator Steve Anderson says, "This decision underscores the need to protect Canada's open Internet. The CRTC's ruling skirts the real issue here: Bell's throttling of its direct competitors. We understand the need for Internet Service Providers like Bell to manage their networks. But that doesn't give them a blank cheque to behave in discriminatory or anti-competitive ways. Policymakers in the U.S. are now moving to protect net neutrality, and Canada needs to do the same. If we don't, Canadian consumers, small businesses, and real competition will lose out."

Last June, CRTC head Konrad von Finckenstein said that a further, deeper probe into net neutrality and throttling on a larger scale is likely in the future. Net neutrality advocates say today's CRTC decision is the opening round in what promises to be a much larger ongoing battle.

For a decade now, the CRTC has mandated that Bell allow third-party companies to rent its network, as a way to encourage more competition and choice in Canada's Internet services market. By refusing fair treatment for CAIP members who lease the network, critics say the CRTC is failing to support competition and fair market prices for Canadian consumers and businesses.

Canadians are encouraged to tell the CRTC what they thinking of this decision at: http://savournet.ca

- 30 -

Contact:
Steve Anderson
SaveOurNet.ca
Coordinator
604-837-5730
steve@democraticmedia.ca

SaveOurNet.ca is a coalition of citizens, businesses, and public interest groups fighting to protect our Internet's level playing field.

Advertisement
recommend This comment thread is now closed
1
Edmund Jenks

Important information to anyone, anywhere, who look toward the freedoms new media provides for information and general communications.

0
Scrivener

There's a global assault on equal access to the web.  Australia has imposed a filtering mechanism that could be seen as a limit on speech.  In America, corporate interests who seek to "monetize" web traffic surely will use this Canadian decision to advance their efforts at imposing "tiered" levels of service -- what might be called "pay for play."

While it may not seem to be related to this, I've noticed a sharp increase lately in the number of "spam comments" on NP channels, notably my own pages.  Equal access to web sites, and the free speech that the web (theoretically) confers on any user, threatens those who would limit the right to communicate to those who are able to pay the roll.

Let's encourage NP users to address these issues in upcoming posts.  I know I will.

Now I have to figure out what I can do about all the "spam" that's hitting my comments pages,  including pages of gibberish.  Anyone with suggestions, please send me a msg.


0
Mary Richard

http://saveournet.ca/content/take-action

http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=21133236326&ref=share

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

NowPublic on Facebook

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

mtippett
First Flagged at 9:55 AM, Nov 20, 2008 by mtippett
These members have powered this story:

Most Recommended Stories in Tech & Biz

Recommendations (36)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from