Death of Free Internet is Imminent –Canada Will Become Test Case

by Maireid Sullivan | July 22, 2008 at 05:25 pm
1123 views | 31 Recommendations | 19 comments

Photos

20071014_4714.jpg

20071014_4714.jpg

see larger image

uploaded by Dan Edelstein

The idea that we would have to pay to visit most websites is unthinkable, right?–
Wrong! This is not about 'subscribing' to a website. This story tells how two Canadian companies are planning a cable service style approach, for launch in 2010 in Canada, followed by the rest of the world.

In the last 15 years or so, as a society we have had access to more information than ever before in modern history because of the Internet. There are approximately 1 billion Internet users in the world and any one of these users can theoretically communicate in real time with any other on the planet. The Internet has been the greatest technological achievement of the 20th century by far, and has been recognized as such by the global community.

The free transfer of information, uncensored, unlimited and untainted, still seems to be a dream when you think about it.  Whatever field that is mentioned- education, commerce, government, news, entertainment, politics and countless other areas-  have been radically affected by the introduction of the Internet. And mostly, it's good news, except when poor judgements are made and people are taken advantage of. Scrutiny and oversight are needed, especially where children are involved.

However, when there are potential profits open to a corporation, the needs of society don't count. Take the recent case in Canada with the behemoths, Telus and Rogers rolling out a charge for text messaging without any warning to the public. It was an arrogant and risky move for the telecommunications giants because it backfired. People actually used Internet technology to deliver a loud and clear message to these companies and that was to scrap the extra charge. The people used the power of the Internet against the big boys and the little guys won.


However, the issue of text messaging is just a tiny blip on the radar screens of Telus and another company, Bell Canada, the two largest Internet Service Providers (ISP'S) in Canada. Our country is being used as a test case to drastically change the delivery of Internet service forever. The change will be so radical that it has the potential to send us back to the horse and buggy days of information sharing and access.
 
In the upcoming weeks watch for a report in Time Magazine that will attempt to smooth over the rough edges of a diabolical plot by Bell Canada and Telus, to begin charging per site fees on most Internet sites.  The plan is to convert the Internet into a cable-like system, where customers sign up for specific web sites, and then pay to visit sites beyond a cutoff point.

From my browsing (on the currently free Internet) I have discovered that the 'demise' of the free Internet is slated for 2010 in Canada, and two years later around the world.  Canada is seen a good choice to implement such shameful and sinister changes, since Canadians are viewed as being laissez fair, politically uninformed and an easy target. The corporate marauders will iron out the wrinkles in Canada and then spring the new, castrated version of the Internet on the rest of the world, probably with little fanfare, except for some dire warnings about the 'evil' of the Internet (free) and the CEO's spouting about 'safety and security'. These buzzwords usually work pretty well.


Continued...

Advertisement
recommend This comment thread is now closed
0
René

There's thousands of sites like that already! Including many major magazines and news sources.

0
Maireid Sullivan

I adjusted my comment to reflect the difference between subscribing and this plan for ALL websites to have an asociated entry charge to the server.

0
Maireid Sullivan


Jarrett Martineau
Jarrett Martineau
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 19:47 on July 22nd, 2008

Maireid Sullivan, very interesting post. I wonder if "the 'demise' of the free internet" could sneakily coincide with the 2010 Olympics; what a great time that would be to get Canadians to pay for online content. Then again, maybe I'm just too cynical. Good stuff.

0
Maireid Sullivan

Thank you for the flag, Jarrett.

I just can't believe that the servers will allow this to happen, since they are not all owned by 'conglomerates'


0
Sanjay Jha

There have been attempts earlier to charge for viewing online contents. In fact Wall street Journal site was a paid site but it didn't work. Let's hope people get used to pay for the online content.

0
Maireid Sullivan

Thank you for the flag, Sanjay,

Yes, the NY Times requires subscription and it is free, and many people don't even want to do that. I think 'free enterprise' can't curtail the free internet. :)


Rhonda J Mangus
Rhonda J Mangus
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 21:17 on July 22nd, 2008

Maireid Sullivan, I like this story. It's good stuff.

0
Maireid Sullivan

Thanks again, Rhonda! :)

Uwe Paschen
Uwe Paschen
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 22:11 on July 22nd, 2008

Maireid Sullivan, I like this story. It's good stuff.

That be the day I disconnect!

Caoimhin1
Caoimhin1
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 23:17 on July 22nd, 2008

Maireid Sullivan, I like this story. It's good stuff.

0
Maireid Sullivan

Thanks for the flag, Cao! ...and good morning! Hey! we're just going to have to stop meeting like this - just as you are getting up in Ireland and I'm closing down the computer for the evening in Australia. lol

enathu
enathu
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 23:46 on July 22nd, 2008

Maireid Sullivan, I like this story. It's good stuff.

0
Maireid Sullivan

Thank you for the flag, enathu

0
Bob Macdonald

Canadians are too politically correct and complacent to fight this. I would be very worried about anything like this coming from Canada: it is always the test case for the G8 countries, which they then roll out to. As the country has become more highly variagated, its politics has become fractured and wimpy.

0
Maireid Sullivan

Thanks for the flag, Bob.

This is exactly what the article says, Bob, and it is also the situation in Australia, but we have a population of only 21 million, so, we don't receive the initial targeting...I think.

On second thought, I remember a situation back in 1992, when we had a referendum on paying for local calls, and Telecom (Telstra now) lost the referendum. I asked one of the top execs. (one of my regular concert audience members) how he felt about loosing the vote. He said it didn't matter, because in 5 years they would be giving away phones and charging long-distance for local calls. I told this to friends and none of us could fathom it THEN ...but it has happened with cell phones. The lesson? All of these big companies have a long-term marketing plan.

We need to investigate their marketing strategy. :)



infomatique
infomatique
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 07:26 on July 25th, 2008

Maireid Sullivan, I like this story. It's good stuff.

0
Maireid Sullivan

Thank you very much, Informatique.

I imagine you are very familiar with the details of this issue, considering the work you do.


0
Amy Judd

I really wish this wasn't been started in Canada! Usually we're way behind on stuff like this.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from