is reporting from
Member
NP Rank:
NP Rank:
The idea that we would have to pay to visit most websites is unthinkable, right?–
Wrong! This is not about 'subscribing' to a website. This story tells how two Canadian companies are planning a cable service style approach, for launch in 2010 in Canada, followed by the rest of the world.
In the last 15 years or so, as a society we have had access to more information than ever before in modern history because of the Internet. There are approximately 1 billion Internet users in the world and any one of these users can theoretically communicate in real time with any other on the planet. The Internet has been the greatest technological achievement of the 20th century by far, and has been recognized as such by the global community.
The free transfer of information, uncensored, unlimited and untainted, still seems to be a dream when you think about it. Whatever field that is mentioned- education, commerce, government, news, entertainment, politics and countless other areas- have been radically affected by the introduction of the Internet. And mostly, it's good news, except when poor judgements are made and people are taken advantage of. Scrutiny and oversight are needed, especially where children are involved.
However, when there are potential profits open to a corporation, the needs of society don't count. Take the recent case in Canada with the behemoths, Telus and Rogers rolling out a charge for text messaging without any warning to the public. It was an arrogant and risky move for the telecommunications giants because it backfired. People actually used Internet technology to deliver a loud and clear message to these companies and that was to scrap the extra charge. The people used the power of the Internet against the big boys and the little guys won.
However, the issue of text messaging is just a tiny blip on the radar screens of Telus and another company, Bell Canada, the two largest Internet Service Providers (ISP'S) in Canada. Our country is being used as a test case to drastically change the delivery of Internet service forever. The change will be so radical that it has the potential to send us back to the horse and buggy days of information sharing and access.
In the upcoming weeks watch for a report in Time Magazine that will attempt to smooth over the rough edges of a diabolical plot by Bell Canada and Telus, to begin charging per site fees on most Internet sites. The plan is to convert the Internet into a cable-like system, where customers sign up for specific web sites, and then pay to visit sites beyond a cutoff point.
From my browsing (on the currently free Internet) I have discovered that the 'demise' of the free Internet is slated for 2010 in Canada, and two years later around the world. Canada is seen a good choice to implement such shameful and sinister changes, since Canadians are viewed as being laissez fair, politically uninformed and an easy target. The corporate marauders will iron out the wrinkles in Canada and then spring the new, castrated version of the Internet on the rest of the world, probably with little fanfare, except for some dire warnings about the 'evil' of the Internet (free) and the CEO's spouting about 'safety and security'. These buzzwords usually work pretty well.
July 22, 2008 at 06:25 pm by Maireid Sullivan, 758 views, 28 comments
Add a comment
Comments (28)
at 18:49 on July 22nd, 2008
There's thousands of sites like that already! Including many major magazines and news sources.
at 19:14 on July 22nd, 2008
This is not about that. This is about your cable provider charging you to visit each site! Please go and read the story. This is a whole new way for control over the internet and I'm sure you'll agree, after you read the story, that if this is allowed to happen it is the end of free acces to information on the internet, globally!
at 19:43 on July 22nd, 2008
I adjusted my comment to reflect the difference between subscribing and this plan for ALL websites to have an asociated entry charge to the server.
at 19:56 on July 22nd, 2008
at 19:15 on July 22nd, 2008
Good find Mareid. I read this one today on Global Research. This is actually the most sly assault yet!
at 19:49 on July 22nd, 2008
Thanks for the flag, Moonwolf, and for explaining to René.
I've adjusted the comment so readers will understand that this is not about 'subscribing' to a web service, but a cable tv approach, with fees paid to the server.
Global Research is a fantastic resource! I found the terrific Michel Chossudovsky article on Iran there today too.
at 20:47 on July 22nd, 2008
Maireid Sullivan, very interesting post. I wonder if "the 'demise' of the free internet" could sneakily coincide with the 2010 Olympics; what a great time that would be to get Canadians to pay for online content. Then again, maybe I'm just too cynical. Good stuff.
at 22:38 on July 22nd, 2008
Thank you for the flag, Jarrett.
I just can't believe that the servers will allow this to happen, since they are not all owned by 'conglomerates'
at 21:23 on July 22nd, 2008
There have been attempts earlier to charge for viewing online contents. In fact Wall street Journal site was a paid site but it didn't work. Let's hope people get used to pay for the online content.
at 22:41 on July 22nd, 2008
Thank you for the flag, Sanjay,
Yes, the NY Times requires subscription and it is free, and many people don't even want to do that. I think 'free enterprise' can't curtail the free internet. :)
at 19:30 on July 23rd, 2008
The difference is, if a specific site wants to charge you get a choice and have alternative sites. If, however, your provider charges you for every site you visit you do not have any choice at all.
at 22:17 on July 22nd, 2008
Maireid Sullivan, I like this story. It's good stuff.
at 22:39 on July 22nd, 2008
Thanks again, Rhonda! :)
at 22:50 on July 22nd, 2008
Maireid Sullivan, I like this story. It's good stuff. I think that we all knew this would be coming at some point in the future. The same thing happened to television, although it enabled a greater variety of channels to become available I believe. I do not want to see the day that we are charged like this in the United States.
at 23:05 on July 22nd, 2008
Thank you for the flag, Ghos7
Now we are forewarned. :)
at 23:11 on July 22nd, 2008
Maireid Sullivan, I like this story. It's good stuff.
That be the day I disconnect!
at 00:17 on July 23rd, 2008
Maireid Sullivan, I like this story. It's good stuff.
at 01:26 on July 23rd, 2008
Thanks for the flag, Cao! ...and good morning! Hey! we're just going to have to stop meeting like this - just as you are getting up in Ireland and I'm closing down the computer for the evening in Australia. lol
at 00:46 on July 23rd, 2008
Maireid Sullivan, I like this story. It's good stuff.
at 01:27 on July 23rd, 2008
Thank you for the flag, enathu
- reply
Bob Macdonald (not verified)at 01:08 on July 23rd, 2008
Canadians are too politically correct and complacent to fight this. I would be very worried about anything like this coming from Canada: it is always the test case for the G8 countries, which they then roll out to. As the country has become more highly variagated, its politics has become fractured and wimpy.
at 19:37 on July 23rd, 2008
I disagree completely. Being polite and looking for solutions without stylized combat is not complacency. Look at the current popular revolts against Bills C-51 and C-84, two bad pieces of legislation that the conservatives are trying to fob off on us. Canadians are well educated, politically astute, and more aware of what is going on in Canada and the rest of the world than the citizens of many countries. This will go over like a lead balloon.
at 02:30 on July 23rd, 2008
Thanks for the flag, Bob.
This is exactly what the article says, Bob, and it is also the situation in Australia, but we have a population of only 21 million, so, we don't receive the initial targeting...I think.
On second thought, I remember a situation back in 1992, when we had a referendum on paying for local calls, and Telecom (Telstra now) lost the referendum. I asked one of the top execs. (one of my regular concert audience members) how he felt about loosing the vote. He said it didn't matter, because in 5 years they would be giving away phones and charging long-distance for local calls. I told this to friends and none of us could fathom it THEN ...but it has happened with cell phones. The lesson? All of these big companies have a long-term marketing plan.
We need to investigate their marketing strategy. :)
at 02:54 on July 23rd, 2008
Maireid Sullivan, I like this story. It's good stuff.
at 18:25 on July 23rd, 2008
Thank you for the flag, Johnny, I've posted an excellent review of this history above.
at 08:26 on July 25th, 2008
Maireid Sullivan, I like this story. It's good stuff.
at 16:24 on July 25th, 2008
Thank you very much, Informatique.
I imagine you are very familiar with the details of this issue, considering the work you do.
at 16:57 on July 25th, 2008
I really wish this wasn't been started in Canada! Usually we're way behind on stuff like this.