electronet replacing central nuclear power losses

by SOLARLIFE | April 20, 2008 at 04:58 am
461 views | 0 Recommendations | 0 comments

Videos

"Smart Grid" - Renovation Of Our Obsolete Power Grid

see larger video

sourced by SOLARLIFE

"Smart Grid" - Renovation Of Our Obsolete Power Grid

Photos

electronet replacing central nuclear power losses

electronet replacing central nuclear power losses

see larger image

uploaded by SOLARLIFE

Electronet SMART GRID AWARD Washington DC

http://www.gridweek.com/2007/content/awards.asp

Putting all other arguments aside, critics say that nuclear power is going to provide too little, too late. Jeremy Rifkin, president of the Foundation on Economic Trends and author of the Hydrogen Economy, told CNN: "To get any appreciable impact on climate change you have to get 20 percent from renewable energies. For nuclear power to achieve this figure would mean building 3000 nuclear plants -- that's three power plants every 30 days for the next 60 years."

The problems don't end there, Rifkin says. "We still don't know how to get rid of the nuclear waste. There is a problem of uranium deficits between 2025 and 2035 and there are also security threats."

But the most important factor, according to Rifkin, is that we don't have enough water. "In France -- which is the quintessential nuclear country -- 40 percent of all the water consumed every year goes to cooling the nuclear reactors. And when it comes back it's heated and it dehydrates the lakes and streams and furthers climate change drought. During the heat wave of 2003, there wasn't enough water to cool the reactors, so they had to slow them down," he said.

cnn, economics of energy:

"These are points which critics regularly voice.
Nuclear power stations do cost billions of dollars
to construct.

There is also a considerable environmental cost
in mining uranium, building reactors and disposing
of the radioactive waste -- an average nuclear power
plant produces around 30 tons of waste every year.

All these activities produce considerable amounts of CO2.
Mining and maintenance produce same CO2 like a coal plant.
The economic cost of waste disposal alone is vast."
 
According to Friends of the Earth,
disposing of the existing waste from the UK's 19 reactors
will in total cost a staggering $110 billion.
And this is all before we start worrying about decommissioning
costs, potential leaks and disasters that come with the territory.
Service companies may declare bankruptcy one day like air carriers
leaving next generation with unidentified waste contaminating water.

Advertisement

Comments (0)

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

NowPublic on Facebook

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

These members have powered this story:

Most Recommended Stories in Tech & Biz

 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from