Fannie, Freddie say they have plenty of capital

by Maireid Sullivan | July 17, 2008 at 06:43 pm
485 views | 26 Recommendations | 15 comments

Here are two interesting reports on Fannie May and Freddy Mac. Most people don't understand real estate boom and bust cycles. We are now heading into the biggest in history, so it behoves us to study up.

Saviours of the suburbs: are US's twin home loan titans at risk?–
By Krishna Guha, Saskia Scholtes and James Politi–
Tuesday Jun 3 2008 13:50–
Since the onset of the credit crisis, the twin pillars of the US housing finance market have been two venerable government-sponsored enterprises: Fannie Mae (NYSE:FNM) and Freddie Mac. Now experts are wondering whether a continued decline in house prices could cause these pillars to crack.

If they did, US taxpayers could be forced to foot the bill to shore them up. Fannie and Freddie are private companies but operate under a federal charter. They support the housing market by buying and packaging mortgages into securities stamped with their guarantee, as well as holding large portfolios of these securities themselves.

Their market share has swollen since last year with the contraction of the market for "private label" mortgage-backed securities (MBS) sold by investment banks. Fannie and Freddie accounted for 84 per cent of total MBS issuance in the first quarter - up from 33 per cent at the peak of the US housing boom in 2006.


Fannie, Freddie say they have plenty of capital

By Mark Felsenthal and Alister Bull
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac said on Friday that their finances were sufficiently sound to withstand the housing crisis as government officials scrambled to restore confidence in the country's two largest mortgage finance companies.


U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson indicated that a bailout of Fannie and Freddie was unlikely despite financial market concerns that the agencies, which finance nearly half of U.S. homes, may have trouble raising enough money to keep buying mortgages.


A key senator said the U.S. Federal Reserve was considering allowing Fannie and Freddie to borrow directly from the central bank, spurring speculation that the Fed may take action as early as this weekend. Fannie and Freddie shares, after taking a beating, recovered some of their earlier losses but ending lower on the day.


Investors were worried that the mortgage agencies might run short of capital, placing the fragile U.S. economy at even greater risk and deepening the housing slump. Dodd sought to reassure investors about the health of the two companies.

"These institutions are fundamentally sound and strong," Dodd said at a news conference. "There is no reason for the kind of (stock market) reaction we're getting."


The reference to keeping Fannie and Freddie in their current form was a signal the government was not on the verge of nationalizing them, and that it wanted to see them survive as congressionally chartered but privately-held companies, a source familiar with the administration's thinking said.

Separately, the Senate passed a housing bill on Friday that included regulatory reform of agencies including Fannie and Freddie, known as government-sponsored enterprises or GSEs. It now moves to the House of Representatives, which has approved a similar measure. The White House has threatened a veto.


A former Fed policy-maker said on Friday that it was crucial that the government bolster Fannie and Freddie and their huge assets.

"It would produce a worldwide financial crisis of unspeakable magnitude if they were allowed to default," said former St. Louis Federal Reserve president William Poole.

Fannie shares closed at $10.25, down some 22 percent, but well above the session low of $6.68. Freddie closed at $7.75, down 3.1 percent, after touching a low of $3.89 earlier in the session. Both have lost close to 90 percent of their value since August. The companies' bonds, however, posted gains.

Bondholders theoretically would have priority in any insolvency.

SUNDAY FIREWORKS?

Fannie and Freddie own or guarantee $5 trillion of debt, close to half of all U.S. mortgages. They have been hit hard by the nation's housing crisis, suffering billions of dollars of losses and higher borrowing costs as many investors lose confidence they can raise sufficient capital to stay afloat.

Since the crisis began, Fannie and Freddie have lost more than $11 billion, and raised some $20 billion of capital.

Read the full article:

recommend This comment thread is now closed
everchanging
everchanging
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 19:25 on July 17th, 2008

Maireid Sullivan, What a whirlwind of fine talk by these two private mortgage entities and by the U.S. Government for allow the people of America to have to pay to keep them alive. 

If the Bush administration wanted to own the Americas people via government control here would be the chance. Why not just do an emanate domain upon the whole of America who have their Mortgage in these two entities by not only giving them funding to stay afloat, Instead let them do a flop then a complete buy out and the government of U.S. owns the people and their homes. 

0
Maireid Sullivan

Thank you for the flag, everchanging.

You have posited a horrible possibility!

I HIGHLY recommend the book, "The Corruption of Economics" by Prof Mason Gaffney - or read his website: 

There is a SMART alternative, and he is one of several world authorities.



Amy Judd
Amy Judd
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 19:48 on July 17th, 2008

Maireid Sullivan, I like this story. It's good stuff.

I saw a report on this this other day, and while it is a very confusing subject (for me anyway) it is also a necessary one to know about and think about.

It shocks me that the US taxpayers could be forced to foot the bill for these two companies. I'm not sure confidence can be restored at all here.

0
Maireid Sullivan

Thank you for the flag, Amy,

There is an alternative economic system, known as "classical economics, based on the work of several English 1800 century economists, –the most unchallengeable is the economist David Ricardo. The book, "The Corruption of Economics" by Prof Mason Gaffney is a great read and so are his essays on his website:

We're making a documentary film about this system.



Mikasi
Mikasi
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 20:25 on July 17th, 2008

Maireid Sullivan, I like this story. It's good stuff.


Two words - corporate welfare. Once again a private institution with government guarantees backing it will get to fleece the taxpayer. Is this some sort of a game that the overly monied play?

0
Mikasi

and thanks for the web link - I am checking his site now.

0
Maireid Sullivan

Thank you for the flag, Mikasi,

And let me know how you like Prof. Gaffney's perspective too :)



0
René

So, why is the Fed and the govt continuing to say they want to bail out the companies that are fine? They have plenty of money, they don't need to be bailed out. what's going on with that? If you have answers from Australia on US problems. funny.

0
René

So how's the markets Downunder?

Paschen
Paschen
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 00:54 on July 18th, 2008

Maireid Sullivan, I like this story. It's good stuff.

Their Capital is not theirs though, it is Tax Money, making the US Citizen pay twice!

Easy talking when one lives from other peoples Money!

Caoimhin1
Caoimhin1
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 01:12 on July 18th, 2008

Maireid Sullivan, I like this story. It's good stuff.  Let us know when the documentary is out Maireid!  :)

0
Maireid Sullivan

Hi Cao, thanks for the flag. I didn't realize there was so much discussion going on because I haven't been online since just after I posted the story. To think I almost didn't post these two stories, –thinking that every American must know how the FED works, etc.


Re. the docu. I've done the interviews, now we're waiting for the script writer to finish his part, then it will be full on. Don't worry, I'll tell you when it's ready all right ! lol

Actually, we're also busy rehearsing a whole new concert program for launch in Sept. - very excited too!


0
V_rod218813

Outstanding response, moonwolf! The markets have been underwritten by the government way too much. Ironically it comes from the conservatives who feel welfare is a waste of government funds, but not corporate welfare. Astounding! World markets are starting to dump the dollar. Key allies actually started the sell off last year. China, which holds the biggest reserves of U.S. dollars, is the newest nation to look for buyers of its U.S. currency.

I am just impressed that people in different countries are more aware of what happens in our country, U.S., than people who live here. Even serving in a combat zone I keep up and educated with this stuff. But I suppose that luxury is something that has become endemic to our society.


0
Caoimhin1

I agree v_rod, excellent analysis Moonwolf!

0
Maireid Sullivan

Hi V_rod218813, good to 'meet' you.

Thanks for the contribution to the discussion.

As to why I'm following these matters, on the personal front, I have lived and studied in the US, and have family and many friends there. Came back to AU 6 years ago, but still pay attention to what is happening there, since the US 'leads' on most important issues. (I'm also very involved in issues in Ireland, where I'm from originally. :)

When we returned to AU in 2002, the AUD$ was at .52 against the USD. Now it is up around .97 - and the Euro is at around 1.50, when just two years ago it was equal to the USD. Yes, as Moonwolf pointed out, the FED is a private 'bank' and the US pays interest on every dollar they print for US consumption.

It is a complex history and unfortunately, I've been in a rush of work over the last few days. in the next week I'll find time to present more info to all those who commented on this story. Because we are making a documentary on this, we have access to the opinions of some amazing 'experts'.

Try to stay alive and healthy, which ever combat zone you are in!!




This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from