Gang Stalking: London Burns as PM States "Social Media Criminals"

by PeaceFrog | August 11, 2011 at 05:18 pm
1068 views | 9 Recommendations | 58 comments


     The "tech-riot" of rioting flash mobs organizing via social media has been acknowledged at the highest levels of British politics and mainstream media after severe arson, looting, and violence rocked London and other cities in the UK for a third day. As expected, the leaders were largely silent about prior flash mob violence and looting and it took massive riots for them to react to and start grilling multinationals like Research In Motion to block criminals from organizing mayhem on their Blackberries. There are more cops on the street of London today than at any other time in that cities storied history.



     As in the U.S., the growing trend of violent flash mobs robbing, assaulting and terrorizing the citizenry is prevalent in the UK today. It took a massive wave of costly riots to get the attention of government officials and the mainstream media. Now, the BBC is reporting on it and even Prime Minister David Cameron is working with police, and multinationals, to get criminals barred from social media and electronic texting. One MP, David Lammy, called for the shutting down of Blackberry's Messenger Service. The Guardian news article is linked below:



http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/aug/11/david-cameron-rioters-social-media



     Gang stalking victims realize that social media is enabling gang stalking groups to operate and oppress their targets here and abroad. The criminal trends of riotous flash mob activity and gang stalking are like twin sisters (i.e., similar modus operandi). At the heart of the problem are the criminal lowlife who find strength in numbers and anonymity, and, are inclined to stalking, looting, arson and every other species of criminal group activity. They have evolved to the internet and social media to advance their pernicious proclivities.



     In recent months the U.S. mainstream media has reported on the dangerous trend of criminal flash mob activity and even gang stalking to an extent. The "public panic" government officials fear of addressing, or, having a largely supplicant media address, is now matastasizing. Does the FBI need riots on the scale of London to address the issue? Is the need for secrecy and the fear of a "public panic" so great that we are willing to face the inevitable insurgency of criminal flash mob riots on a London scale before we address it?



     Both gang stalking and criminal flash mobs need to be brought to light and addressed comprehensively before not after they leave carnage in their wake. A large part of this will be achieved by putting reasonable restrictions on the use of social media and other instant group communication, such as barring flash mob and gang stalking members from these privileges.



GOD SAVE THE LAW ABIDING CITIZEN!


Advertisement
recommend Sign In or Join to post comments
0
anonymously commenting

rt.com/programs/alyona-show/london-riots-us/

0
Scrivener

So now the great anti- "gang stalking" crusader "Peacefrog" advocates a crackdown on social media, which we, the extrajudicially persecuted, depend upon to get our message out, and to organize peaceful social activism .

Need any more evidence that "flash mobs" are being exploited -- perhaps even generated -- by the forces behind vigilante community "policing" domestic terrorism, a convenient bogeyman to deflect attention from the biggest "flash mobber" of all -- the network of 72 Homeland-administered "fusion centers" and their prime contractor/communications coordinator Lockheed Martin, conducting a silent genocide and ideological purge of America, using psyops agents like "Peacefrog" to dissiminate their disinformation agit-propaganda?

Good thing you're so transparent, "Peacefrog." Tell your military contractor supervisor that your taxpayer-pillaging psyops have been exposed as a fraud on the American people.  And stop ruining NowPublic, turning it into your personal Breitbart/NewsMax.

http://nowpublic.com/world/thugocracy-u-s-fed-police-vigilantes-persecute-citizen-targets

http://nowpublic.com/world/u-s-govt-runs-gang-stalking-vigilantism-says-ex-fbi-official

 

0
PeaceFrog

     I'm sorry that you can not appreciate the point made of the misuse of social media for criminal conspiracy against civil rights, property, and ordered liberty. Perhaps, when Dr. Evil stops zapping you with his nefarious laser gun, you can rethink the issue of constructive versus criminal use of social media.

0
Scrivener

Sorry you missed MY point -- that the fusion center Gestapo, at the minimum, encourages such lawlessness via its community "policing" vigilante black ops coordinated by Lockheed Martin operatives over Lockheed Martin- administered cell networks -- and at the maximum, perhaps some of these black ops are being "misused" to foment civil unrest, a justification for a civil liberties crackdown and more billions for Homeland, defense and intel contractors (like the ones who apparently pay YOU).

0
PeaceFrog

     Agreed on that statement. However, passing laws against criminals using Blackberry Message or social media will impede an FBI MCcarthyesq Scare. 

0
Peace Lizard

And who gets to define "criminals"?   Will our Domestic Gestapo be defined as criminals and prevented from using Blackberries to stalk victims of their extrajudicial prisons?

0
Anonymously Given

Agreed -  Because the cell-phone-stalking system - which can be driven by automated social media call lists, is an activator for mob violence by the fact of the anonymity combined with the power of automation - neither of which is usually necessary for the expression of free speech.

0
anonymously commenting

I posted a comment last night, followed by a clarifying comment.  The original comment is gone.

1
anonymously commenting

"London riots could come to US?" is the title of the piece found via the previous link.  ------  Gang stalking is a menace -- there is no place for it in civil society.  One way or another the truth will see the light

0
anon comment

"London riots could come to US?" is the title of the piece found via the previous link.  ------  Gang stalking is a menace -- there is no place for it in civil society.  One way or another the truth will see the light.

0
anon comment

www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2011/08/11/hussain_britain/index.html

0
Borat

Vic is an American hero, defending Americans' basic rights of free speech and free association. Peacefrog, not so much.

1
anon  poster

Vic is an idiot.  Fact.

1
PeaceFrog

     So, an American hero TI condones the misuse of social media as a tool to enable gang stalkers, rioters and other destructive criminals to terrorize?

0
Scrivener

Talk about TOTAL DISINFO.  Anyone with half a brain cell can see through your charade.  I bet you go home every night laughing at your jarhead supervisors who actually PAY you (and soak the American taxpayer) to post your thinly-veiled agit-prop.

If you were REALLY clever, you'd use your Jughead supervisor's anal retentive qualities to perform some double agentry in the cause of justice.  Believe me, they won't catch on, until the contract is cancelled -- which already may have happened!!!

 

1
Let's begin at the source

The US Government was the FIRST to mis-use cellphones to coordinate attacks and surveillance by DHS-FBI-supervised gangstalkers.  So let's start by stopping this official mis-use of cellphones.     "Official" flash-mobbing is the real source of all this gang-related bullying and mobbing.  Continuous (24/7/365)  US Gov-sponsored  gangstalking and police harassment are what drove Jiverly Wong to go berserk and shoot randomly.  When the Government is a serial Gangstalker, what can we expect from society at large but more of the same.

0
Scrivener

It's how the cellphone networks are used, right.  THE MISUSE IS A CONSPIRACY TO DENY INDIVIDUALS THEIR CIVIL RIGHTS.  IT IS THE ABUSE OF POWER on the part of the officials running the network.  It's not the organizing network technology that's to blame. It's the misuse of the technology in a criminal conspiracy, directing illegal acts committed by those on the receiving end of ILLEGAL COMMANDS. 

 

0
PeaceFrog

     As a "TI" who is "tortured" by the state security goons, including defense contractors, how do you rationalize not putting reasonable restrictions on the criminal use of social media? How does keeping the apparatus for mob action (gang stalking and flash mobs), to wit, social media and electronic communications legal for criminal conspirators help you?

     You sound like an FBI/military apologist because you're rationale allows for the sanctioned criminal use of social media which will end up causing London-style riots and creating conditions for stricter state security laws that you pretend to oppose!

0
Scrivener

This is all a psyop to CRIMINALIZE SPEECH even absent criminal BEHAVIOR.  You seek to take down the apparatus necessary for social organization and association, when it is criminal BEHAVIOR, not speech, or "meet up at the town square," that should be punished. 

Law enforcement can and should monitor public (as opposed to PRIVATE) speech, including social media, to detect and deter planned acts of VIOLENCE.  But it is a slippery slope when psyops agents like you use words like "reasonable restrictions" to criminalize speech. 

Let be be more specific.  Homeland-mil-intel wants to be able to "review" instant communications such as instant messaging -- and Facebook posts.  Why?  Not to stop mobbing -- but to CENSOR POLITICAL SPEECH.  It's the reason why my Facebook posts, until very recently, did not instantly go though, but were either DELAYED OR DEEP-SIXED, depending of the opinions and proclivities of some Lockheed Martin fratboy cyberNazi playing "infoGod" with his cyberwar toys. 

And if the objectionable speaker doesn't get the message, then the cyberNazi gives him/her a "poke" with their microwave / radio frequency directed energy weapon network, conveniently mounted on cell tower masts everywhere, coast to coast.

I am working on a commentary directed at well-meaning DUPES like Philly Mayor Nutter to set them straight on the false flag censorship black ops of the ideologues and hate mongers who are staging a silent coup, using lying goons like YOU as their infowarriors.

Again, the biggest flash mobbers in the USA are the organizers of community policing vigilantism -- federal and local security, intel and law enforcement agencies.  They are at the root of "gang stalking," and while I have no proof, I wouldn't be surprised if corporate and government ideologues and hate-mongers are using cell nets to foment violence as a pretext for a crackdown on POLITICAL SPEECH and POLITICAL MOBILIZATION under the suberfuge of "reasonable restrictions." 

You bastards are trying to criminalize political speech and I'm calling you out.

0
People, not guns, kill people

It's not the cellphones that are the threat. It is the "terrorist task force managers" who use the cellphones who are the real threat.

0
Don't tread on me

The Evildoers want to control all inputs and outputs of people who disagree with their nazification of the whole country, turning the US into a virtual prison. These idiot cybernazis and gangstalkers are creating the prisons for themselves and their children. They just don't "get it" that the Evildoers USE their gullibility to achieve total control. You dupes need to read every word Vic writes -- he is right, you are wrong, and understanding him may save your life and children's lives. Stop destroying America's freedoms under the false pretext of protecting America. You're only protecting evil, evil people who want to enslave all of us.

1
PeaceFrog

     There are already time, place and manner restrictions on speech. You can not yell fire in a crowded theatre, nor can you tell someone you will break their legs if they do not pay up. Nobody should be free to invite people to looting, arson and violence through texts and social media. 

0
The 1

PeaceFrog I see you woke up the mentally and psychotically tortured Scrivener, and his groupie crowd of nit pick mentally deranged incognito ass lickers. Good luck with that crowd !

I'll just say that even though you may currently feel passionate about cell phone use in this organized gangstalking issue, that you are actually talking about issues of limiting 'freedom of speech, privacy issues' and expanding government electronic domestic surveillance. All constitutional and legal issues. I'm sure once you step back, you'll realize as a lawyer that approach isn't the best one.

Thxs_great article !

0
PeaceFrog

     After the Watts, Newark and other inner city riots of the late 1960's the U.S. FEMA Chief came up with an emergency internment plan that included internment of 21 million African Americans. See link:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rex_84

     This represented at about 93% of blacks in the U.S. at that time See Link:

http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0922246.html

     The question is, in a counrty in which nearly every generation has seen military scare tactics to wildly oppress civil rights (Palmer Raids, McCarthyism, Gitmo, etc.) what will the response of the federal government be when London-style riots occur here? I do not believe it will be as subtle as what is being proposed in England (i.e., tamping down some speech).

0
The 1

Btw PeaceFrog, a little off topic here, but in in response to some of Scrivener comments of EWS attack and your apparent belief of.."Dr. Evil stops zapping you with his nefarious laser gun"; If you don't mind and have time, look over the below link article. It explains and eludes to possibilities into that scenario.

Thxs !

REMOTE BEHAVIORAL INFLUENCE TECHNOLOGY EVIDENCE

Also see:

Remote Neural Monitoring: Civil Action by John St. Clair Akwei

0
Scrivener

The oft-qouted Akwei lawsuit: another psyop to cover up a nationwide electromagnetic assault grid deployed on cell tower masts?  Dou ya THINK?

0
Here's One-ie

Herr 1derkind rises from the ashes to the  rescue of Peacefrog     in a show of cybernazi solidarity.

0
The 1

<Here's One-ie (not verified)>..nit pick mentally deranged incognito ass licker

0
when government is the one lying 'fire'

Nobody (and that includes the Fusion centers) should be free to invite people to stalking, threatening, and slandering through passing photos of victims and instructions through texts and social media.  Wake up, buddy.

0
Scrivener

This "debate" is ridiculous.  There is a difference between a conspiracy to deny individuals their civil rights and getting the flash mob dancers together for the next iteration of "Thriller."  The former is a criminal conspiracy, the latter is just havin' fun. There must be probable cause to impute criminal intent.  Intent is key.  Remember that thing called the U.S. Constitution, due process, the bill of rights?  Or do American values not comport to your fascist world view?

This is a free speech issue.  Responsible law enforcement can and must discern between constitutionally protected speech and criminal conspiracy.  Again, it's the BEHAVIOR that matters, the INTENT, not the mode of communications.  Only jarhead fascist idiots with a hidden agenda of ideology and/or hate would fail to see the distinction.

Pentagon-Homeland-Intel needs to give all among its ranks, top to bottom, a refresher course on the U.S. Constitution and why it matters -- STAT.

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

Anonymous
First Flagged at 5:22 PM, Aug 11, 2011 by Anonymous (not verified)

Most Recommended Stories in Tech & Biz

Recommendations (9)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from