NP Rank:
GM Dealer Closing List: 1,100 General Motors Dealerships
General Motors, in its continued attempt to become solvent, is closing 1,100 dealerships, and has already begun to alert those affected. There is no public list of the closures yet. This announcement comes on the heels of Chrysler's closure announcement yesterday.
We'll post a link to the full dealer closing list as it becomes available.
Last month, GM had announced that it would be closing 2,600 dealerships overall by 2010, and this is the first round of those closures.
While these closures will give some relief to GM, their effect on the dealerships' communities will not be so positive, as many find themselves out of work.
GM spokeswoman Susan Garontakos said the company will not make public a list of dealers to be cut, leaving the decision to release information to individual business owners.
See also: Chrysler Dealerships Closing: Full List of 789 Dealers
Most Recommended Comment
Crowd Power
-
micbric124
Lake Mary, Florida, United States -
dave_7
Canada -
montcalm
United States -
SteelMaster Spike
Virginia Beach, Virginia, United States -
never a safe second
United States -
UrbanDKaye
United States -
HOGANSWORLD
United States
Recommendations (49)
-
Karl Gotthardt - albertacowpoke
Redwater, Alberta, Canada -
Uwe Paschen
Narita, Chiba, Japan 
Anonymous users (9)
-
wleng
San Bernardino, California, United States -
nukegingrich
Mccomb, Mississippi, United States -
Rhonda J Mangus
North Tonawanda, New York, United States -
duo
Stone Mountain, Georgia, United States -
Mary Richard
Toronto, Canada














Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (143)
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Maqracer (not verified)at 14:57 on June 16th, 2009
Ford Is #1 over Toyota and Honda! AND A GRADE A AMERICAN Company!!!!!!
Buy/Drive/Support FMC #1 in Quality!!! Good call Greg. Way to stand up!
- Sign In or Join to post comments
JMW082 (not verified)at 10:22 on May 15th, 2009
Frank Heeter said:
"thanks to idiots that didnt start drilling for our own oil 5- 8 yrs. ago, now we are crippled relying still on hugo's"
Americans do not see any urgency when oil prices are low, but only are willing to do something when they rise. Eventually, all of the oil (or cheap oil) will be gone. We can keep drilling, but that is only a short term outlook. Sacrifice any environmental concerns for cheaper oil.
It's easy to blame the government for everything, but the truth is that everyone wants something for nothing (or for cheap).
- Sign In or Join to post comments
JIC (not verified)at 10:30 on May 15th, 2009
GM will be safe. Ford should of been long time ago. The quality doesn't stand up.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
auto employee (not verified)at 12:59 on May 15th, 2009
According to recent auto test and ratings, Ford has surpassed Honda and matches the quality of Toyota. The new innovative products are creating a lot of hype. It is time to abonden the old "american is not as good as an import" because it is no longer true. If we spent more time test driving the vehicles and reading consumer reports none of our American auto makers would be in trouble.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Hank279 (not verified)at 18:02 on May 15th, 2009
Well, the Fusion and Milan that are getting great ratings are made in Mexico, not America like most Camrys and Accords. It's the engineering, not where the made. Sadly, Ford will also assemble the new Fiesta in Mexico. Buying Ford doesn't mean American workers will benefit.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
alfred68 (not verified)at 20:44 on May 18th, 2009
What do you mean the quality is better who told you that the liberal media?What do you know I sold cars for 16 years All Domestic makes they are just a good as any Jap car. Its American's who bought into Honda and Toyotas Sales Pitch I am wodering where do you live hopefully not in America. We used to be a Strong Country and it has all changed since people like you that believe the grass is greener and we need to buy from other countrys. You bought in hook line and sinker and all Americans will have to pay for mistakes you made by allowing Japanese Companies taking over our Car industry.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
bobtoyota (not verified)at 14:31 on May 19th, 2009
I have worked on all makes of cars for 25 years and i wont let my wife drive a ford ,gm or Chyrsler i want to know she will get where she is headed without having her intake gasket or transmission,fuel pump going out! all three american cars are junk
- Sign In or Join to post comments
hector7 (not verified)at 10:45 on June 3rd, 2009
I bought my wife a New 09' Malibu! We test drove a Honda, Toyota, and Nissan, guess what! Jap cars ARE JUNK!
- Sign In or Join to post comments
michael miller (not verified)at 03:44 on May 22nd, 2009
There is one thing I'd like to add to this. Check the prices of the parts that need to be replaced ie: ignition coils, starters distributors or for that matter any electrical component if it japanese its twice the price and dont be fooled by the american vehicles with japanese engines such as the sebring 2.5ltr its mitsubishi distributor 1000.00 dollars ignition coil is built in and not available seperatly look I've been a chrysler master tech for the last 10 years been turning wrenchs for over 25 the vehicles made today are a million times better than they were 10 years ago. I hate the fact that they closed my dealer down but there was over saturation in the amount of dealers. But I got a lot of friends that lost jobs and have a crap load of money invested in tools and training they will find jobs some in different dealers some in the independant world thats just the way it works I dont want any american company to fail. But I want them to put out the products that people want, need and I want them to do it with pride. This country is the best country in the world and we all need to respect it its way of free enterprise the politicians in DC are in for a rude awakening starting in less than two years God bless all of the fallen this memorial day
Mike Miller
- Sign In or Join to post comments
alan egerton (not verified)at 10:36 on May 15th, 2009
lets close them all ! we'll have another 2 million unemployed! no taxes, draw unemployment checks, o well just print more money!!!!!!! thanks obama
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Jons (not verified)at 11:58 on May 15th, 2009
No, it's actually thanks George Bush!
- Sign In or Join to post comments
DeeS (not verified)at 13:12 on May 15th, 2009
No it is not George Bush's fault. It is the greed of the UAW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
- Sign In or Join to post comments
68wildcat (not verified)at 11:00 on May 16th, 2009
You obviously have never worked in a factory. Whatever they are paid it is not enough to turn off your brain for 8-10 hours a day. The work isn't hard, the monotony and the conditions in a factory are why they are paid so well. And besides, the UAW invented the weekend and helped build a decent middle class in this country. You sir are an ignorant maroon who knows not of what he speaks.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
American Taxpayer (not verified)at 13:45 on May 20th, 2009
"Whatever they are paid it is not enough to turn off your brain for 8-10 hours a day. The work isn't hard, the monotony and the conditions in a factory are why they are paid so well."
If they turn off their brain at work.. maybe that's why the quality sucks and no one wants to buy.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
debrahky (not verified)at 13:58 on May 16th, 2009
Actually, it is not just one person to blame - there is PLENTY of it to go around. And, most were motivated by greed and the me, me, me attitude.
What goes around comes around - and it's time to pay up. Did people really expect there wouldn't be repercussions to such actions?
- Sign In or Join to post comments
debrahky (not verified)at 14:08 on May 16th, 2009
Actually, they are both part of the creation of this perfect storm. And, not the only ones either.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
D Lynn (not verified)at 05:43 on May 18th, 2009
It's people like the UAW, that help the working man, because if it were not for unions, business could treat their workers like slaves and that's not right. That is why there are so many companies moving to smaller countries so they could use cheap labor because we (anyone, not just Americans) don't have to take that. But to be honest, I do believe it is the fault of G.W. Bush, no matter what you say, his family has money in oil and why he was is office is when oil went up, when he left, it is now back down under $2.....hmmm..I wonder why
- Sign In or Join to post comments
J Rogers (not verified)at 13:33 on May 15th, 2009
Can we quit blaming everything on the Bush Administration? I believe these cuts are happening now...during the Obama Administration!
- Sign In or Join to post comments
ts_1959 (not verified)at 17:30 on May 15th, 2009
Obama inherited a mess from past Aministrations not just from Bush! Besides it seems there's a lot of greed involved as why cars cost so much now days!
- Sign In or Join to post comments
68wildcat (not verified)at 11:06 on May 16th, 2009
For God's sake-are you serious? That's like saying the terrorist problem is Obama's fault because it is happening now. GM was doing just fine thank you until the entire economy went in the tank and nobody could sell cars. The Redumblicans screwed up the economy until not even you ya twit could buy anything. If you closely you will see that most of the recessions and definitly the Depression happened on the Redumblicans watch, proving time and time again you cannot tax cut your way to prosperity.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
American Taxpayer (not verified)at 13:49 on May 20th, 2009
I'll agree that it wasn't the Bush admin's fault for the decline of the auto industry. Poor quality, poor fuel efficiency standards and poor management are what killed the auto industry.
But Bush certainly didn't help them when he stopped the funding for research and development of alternative fuels and efficiencies.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Eddie K (not verified)at 19:00 on May 15th, 2009
This all started in the late'70's , early 80's , when the war on labor began. GM, Ford, and Chrysler's market share began to shrink, not because of poor quality as some would have you believe because that was not the case in all cars the Big 3 made. They built some junkers through the years, but every company has. Americans broke away from being brand loyal. Market share began to shrink simply because there were more choices. It's that simple. The pie can only be sliced so many ways. If the pizza has eight slices and you have four people, thats two slices each. But if you have eight people, thats one slice each, which is what you have today. Don't drink the Kool-Aid that the Big 3 didn't build cars that people wanted to buy. GM built 57 million cars worldwide last year. Somebody likes thier stuff because thats a lot of cars. And don't believe the hype about the UAW either. They don't make $40-80 an hour. That hourly number is the rate of hourly pay, plus benefits, plus retirees pensions and benefits all added up. Do you get paid on benefits and retirees legacies at your job? Nope. Neither do they. They make $17-24 an hour plus benefits. Not bad, but they would be unable to live in New Jersey where I live. $24/hr is not even $50,000/year. But, take a look at what the upper management at just about any corporation is making these days, even when they are bleeding red ink. http://finance.yahoo.com/career-work/article/107075/golden-coffins-golden-offices-golden-retirement?mod=career-salary_negotiation If this doesn't piss you off then nothing will. The greed and stupidity is disgusting. Sure American union workers make more than than non-union counterparts. But you will never hear of a European , Japanese, or Chinese CEO making even close to this kind of coin.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
TEXAS ROCKS (not verified)at 09:54 on May 18th, 2009
HERE WE GO AGAIN! OBAMA IS NOT THE CAUSE OF THIS! IT WAS YOUR COUSINS THE GEORGE BU-SH!TS WHO STARTED ALL THIS MESS! OPEN YOUR EYES A$$HOLE!
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Heywood Jablomy (not verified)at 15:03 on May 18th, 2009
WRONG... it was Bill Clinton that signed in the laws that allowed sub-prime mortgages.. just a matter of time before it hit the fan.. Democrats.. always helping the bottom of the barrel..
- Sign In or Join to post comments
sam from Az (not verified)at 10:57 on May 15th, 2009
How does closing a dealer help GM?
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Mattc01 (not verified)at 18:11 on May 15th, 2009
Thats what I would like to know and I dont want to stir things up but I work for a vw dealer people dont seem to relize that SOME of those "american" cars are just as foreign as ours. The Ford 500 "Mexico". Town and Country/Caravan Canada and the chevy aveo well lets not go there. But I can say that vw is opening plants in the US to build a few of their cars here. I know the Hyundai Sonata is built in Georgia and some of the american cars may be built here but it seems like most of the part on them are not. But hey my vw is 5% built in the US. But in all seriousness I feel bad for these guys are the chrysler dealers and chevy dealers because most of those service depts have been dead for a while and I can understand what those flat rate guys are going through. I wish them all well. Im very fortunate to be at the dealer I am because we are still busy.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Vickie from KY (not verified)at 18:27 on May 15th, 2009
GM closing dealerships makes it much easier to control production and product. With so many lines and dealers to service it is impossible to forcast sales numbers. You will have fewer choices of dealers to shop price against and therefore GM will not have to offer the large incentives to customers and be able to sell at a profit. With fewer dealers to service there will be more plant closings and perment layoffs. This will lower GM's cost of doing business. This lowering of overhead should allow them to become more price competitive.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Larry from OK (not verified)at 03:57 on May 16th, 2009
Sales forcast are controlled by computer programs, taking into consideration days supply and age of inventory. Cutting dealerships will not affect GM's cost of doing business. GM gets their money when the Vin # is assigned to a dealership and we all pay the same price for inventory. Dealerships pay for everything that GM sends them, brochures, tools, training, etc...generally the price paid is over retail. Cutting dealer numbers may increase the profits of the surviving dealerships by eliminating competition and making the consumer pay more. Dealerships are captive customers, they purchase inventory at the price GM sets. There is no negotiating. Incentives are to move product for GM so more invnetory can be sent to dealerships. General Motors, like most businesses are in business to make money for their stockholders, not for the support of dealership
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Gene Fr (not verified)at 11:07 on May 15th, 2009
All joking aside - it is sad to say that it has come down to this folks! I will guarantee that in 10 yrs America will not be a maker of anything but misery and sorrow. America will become the greatest TV makers of all time, wait we tried that, American will become the greatest car maker of all time, wait we tried that, America will become the greatest .... wait for it................
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Smooth J (not verified)at 14:04 on May 15th, 2009
Why is it sad that companies that cannot provide a product people want to buy are suffering? Would you be up in arms if Del Taco was going out of business?
Good Christ the Sacred Cow of the auto industry is just childish. And this is coming from someone with GENERATIONS of union workers and family and friends directly impacted when the Ford plant in Hapeville, GA closed or was "idled" in 2006.
Grow up, it's a job...it's a new day....you move on.